Sysco monopolizing what we eat?

  • Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date
In summary: Industry: Wholesalers: Food and Groceryhttp://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/2197.htmlSysco has about 14-15% of the market, but perhaps somewhat higher in certain geographical areas, of the food services industry.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
gravenewworld said:
Have we all forgotten what fresh food tastes like anymore? Apparently you can't even get fresh food at a lot of 5 star restaurants.

Do all americans eat only at restaurants? You could always go to the grocery store and buy humanely raised potatoes, carrots and apples eyeee mate?
 
  • #3
First, define "fresh." The first article you posted started out talking about cheese. If cheese is fresh, it's just sour milk. :uhh: And, buying through a large supplier doesn't mean it's less fresh than buying through a small supplier. Do you think everything served in a fancy restaurant is locally grown?

Are the apples that I picked last month straight from the tree and are sitting in the crisper bin in my fridge any fresher than the ones at the grocery store that were picked last month and stored in a cooler in a warehouse? If anything, we have more access to fresh foods than ever before, because we can get them shipped rather quickly across the country. Otherwise, if I relied entirely on local producers, this time of year, all I'd be eating would be canned foods and root vegetables that can be stored for a long time in a cool cellar. The growing season is over here.

And, if a restaurant told me the fish it was serving was locally caught, I'd walk out. I know how polluted the rivers are near here.

Of course, it's a good time of year for mutton...any ewes that aren't pregnant by now aren't good for much else other than dinner. And the deer meat is fresh. But vegetables? Not so much.
 
  • #4
How big does a company have to be (how much market share) before you can call it a monopoly? I can't imagine the Sysco has more than a couple of percent of market share. I don't really know, but then, none of the links actually try to defend that claim.

What's this really about?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Moonbear said:
If cheese is fresh, it's just sour milk. :uhh:
No, I'd say if it has gone sour, it is no longer fresh. :tongue:
 
  • #6
gravenewworld said:
Interesting...

Have we all forgotten what fresh food tastes like anymore? Apparently you can't even get fresh food at a lot of 5 star restaurants.
I see a lot of delivery trucks down in Manhattan delievering produce to restaurants and hotels. It's not what I'd call fresh in the sense that it was picked within 24 hrs, but it is un-processed or rather - not frozen.

Sysco has about 14-15% of the market, but perhaps somewhat higher in certain geographical areas, of the food services industry, which is not indicative of a monopoly. However according to the CNN/Fortune 500 list for 2008, Sysco is the largest of the Wholesalers: Food and Grocery sector with about 46% of the market, which might be considered a near-monopoly to some, especially if they have way more than 50% in some local markets.

Industry: Wholesalers: Food and Grocery
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/snapshots/2197.html
Code:
Rank                           Rank in  Revenue
in     Group: Wholesalers      Fortune    in
Group         Food & Grocery    1000    $milions
  1    Sysco                      70    35,042.1 
  2    CHS                       145    17,216.0 
  3    Performance Food Group    384     6,304.9 
  4    Nash-Finch                504     4,532.6 
  5    Core-Mark Holding         537     4,211.5 
  6    Unified Western Grocers   653     3,133.4 
  7    United Natural Foods      717     2,754.3 
  8    Spartan Stores            797     2,370.4

There is also the Food Services group, which includes Sodexo (nee Sodexho, Sodexho-Marriott), which provide food services but are not primarily wholesalers of food and grocery.

Sodexo has revenues of about $17 billion, but the company is more diversified than the food wholesalers.

Then there is McDonald's, Wendy's, KFC, CKE Restaurants, . . . . which have their own distribution systems for their own products, but they are certainly not 5-star restaurants.
 
  • #7
Your first link seems to be praising Sysco for getting fresh food to restaurants fast. That would be a "good" thing, so I have no idea what you are complaining about.
 
  • #8
Moonbear said:
First, define "fresh." The first article you posted started out talking about cheese. If cheese is fresh, it's just sour milk. :uhh: And, buying through a large supplier doesn't mean it's less fresh than buying through a small supplier. Do you think everything served in a fancy restaurant is locally grown?

Are the apples that I picked last month straight from the tree and are sitting in the crisper bin in my fridge any fresher than the ones at the grocery store that were picked last month and stored in a cooler in a warehouse? If anything, we have more access to fresh foods than ever before, because we can get them shipped rather quickly across the country. Otherwise, if I relied entirely on local producers, this time of year, all I'd be eating would be canned foods and root vegetables that can be stored for a long time in a cool cellar. The growing season is over here.

And, if a restaurant told me the fish it was serving was locally caught, I'd walk out. I know how polluted the rivers are near here.

Of course, it's a good time of year for mutton...any ewes that aren't pregnant by now aren't good for much else other than dinner. And the deer meat is fresh. But vegetables? Not so much.


Fresh? Hmmmmmmmm how about food that you simply don't heat up in a microwave? People in the US have no idea where their food comes from anymore. They just shove it down their mouths without even thinking about. When I lived in Europe, I had to go to a real butcher to get meat or had to go to a real local market to get produce. Going to a butcher for meat is a very foreign concept to many people in the US. Most meat comes from giant slaughterhouses and factory farms. They don't hang meat to tenderize and flavor it like they used to, they simply just butcher it in mass production and ship it in shrink wrapped plastic packages in the US.

Your first link seems to be praising Sysco for getting fresh food to restaurants fast. That would be a "good" thing, so I have no idea what you are complaining about.

Or it could be that the 1st link was simply pointing out how far the reach of SYSCO and other mass food distributors has gotten and how restaurant owners are easily going to sacrifice quality of food for profit and convenience (which honestly you can't blame them for). You may think that they piece of cake was a prepared by a gourmet pastry chef at a nice restaurant, but in fact it was probably just dethawed from a frozen package.



I guess people don't really care about where their food comes from these days as long as they can shove it down their pieholes.
 
  • #9
gravenewworld said:
I guess people don't really care about where their food comes from these days as long as they can shove it down their pieholes.

My reason dictates, that it doesn't matter if the food is cloned or shipped from the other side of the globe as long as it is delivered efficiently, it's not harmful and has the nutritional benefits that humans need.
 
  • #10
misgfool said:
My reason dictates, that it doesn't matter if the food is cloned or shipped from the other side of the globe as long as it is delivered efficiently, it's not harmful and has the nutritional benefits that humans need.


And all at the price of taste?


Have you ever had a real aged steak that was hung to tenderize it from a butcher? It is worlds above what you can buy in any grocery store.
 
  • #11
heh, it may be fresh if you go to some of those "white-tablecloth eateries", but i think most of what you get at any of the chain restaurants (not just fast food, but what the lower and middle class may think of as "fine eating") will still probably be reheated frozen foods. i say screw it, you're better off just learning how to cook.
 
  • #12
gravenewworld said:
They don't hang meat to tenderize and flavor it like they used to, they simply just butcher it in mass production and ship it in shrink wrapped plastic packages in the US.
So your real complaint is simply that the meat isn't prepared the way you like it. Stop trying to blame it on a lack of 'freshness'. :grumpy:


I had to go to a real butcher to get meat or had to go to a real local market to get produce. ... piece of cake was a prepared by a gourmet pastry chef at a nice restaurant, but in fact it was probably just dethawed from a frozen package.
I don't care about a 'real butcher' or a 'real local market' or a 'gourmet pastry chef'. I care about food I like to eat. And quite honestly, I would expect to prefer a cake that was "dethawed from a frozen package" than a cake made by a "gourmet pastry chef". In fact, I have discovered over time that my odds of liking a food is inversely proportional to how 'fancy' it is.

Pizza is one of my favorite foods, but I have never had a pizza I liked from a restaurant that wasn't a speciality pizza place. And while pizza from pizza chains is usually pretty good, in almost every circumstance I prefer the taste of a frozen pizza I reheated myself.

If I bought into this whole "buy fresh foods" nonsense, my quality of life would decrease significantly. :tongue: Not to mention I run a greater risk of getting contaminated food.
 
  • #13
gravenewworld said:
Fresh? Hmmmmmmmm how about food that you simply don't heat up in a microwave? People in the US have no idea where their food comes from anymore. They just shove it down their mouths without even thinking about. When I lived in Europe, I had to go to a real butcher to get meat or had to go to a real local market to get produce. Going to a butcher for meat is a very foreign concept to many people in the US. Most meat comes from giant slaughterhouses and factory farms. They don't hang meat to tenderize and flavor it like they used to, they simply just butcher it in mass production and ship it in shrink wrapped plastic packages in the US.
You seem to be heavy on opinion here and light on facts/evidence. I do not eat food that is just heated in a microwave, and it's not at all hard to find fresh food; just look around the perimeter of your grocery store where the fresh produce, meats, butcher, and dairy sections are located. There's also no evidence that this is what restaurants are buying from Sysco. If I want crayfish etouffe and live up in the northern part of the US, I need to buy from someone in the Gulf Coast. A distributor that quickly ships quality crayfish is a good thing, not something to demonize.

Or it could be that the 1st link was simply pointing out how far the reach of SYSCO and other mass food distributors has gotten and how restaurant owners are easily going to sacrifice quality of food for profit and convenience (which honestly you can't blame them for). You may think that they piece of cake was a prepared by a gourmet pastry chef at a nice restaurant, but in fact it was probably just dethawed from a frozen package.
You seem to be misunderstanding what a distributor is. They are not the producer, they are the agent that connects buyers to producers and helps get the product delivered. If one is especially efficient at getting fresh produce from a West coast producer to an East coast buyer, why would that be a bad thing? They might be popular with restaurants who don't want to call 10 different places to get their weekly orders in if they can call one place that will make all the arrangements for them and deliver it all on one truckload on Wednesday, when they want the delivery to arrive. Nothing says the restaurants are buying convenience foods, or pre-made pastries. Even if the distributor sells those, what evidence do you have that that's what the restaurants are buying? Some do...chain restaurants of course do, but this is no surprise or mystery...nor does it even mean this is the supplier they are getting those foods from.

I guess people don't really care about where their food comes from these days as long as they can shove it down their pieholes.

It seems you are for some reason trying to argue based on an emotional reaction to something you have yet to explain, but are light on facts here. If a particular distributor is very efficient at getting quality foods to me on time and while still fresh, why is that a bad thing? Did you think the live Maine lobsters in the grocery store somehow magically arrived directly from Maine without a distributor involved? How do you think food gets around the country? And as Astronuc already provided evidence to support, Sysco does not have a monopoly on this sector. There are other distributors and they have not been driven out of business. Of course, the top restaurants are going to go with the distributor with the top reputation for getting the fresh foods to them while still fresh. None of this is consistent with your claims that the food is not fresh or that people don't care about fresh food.
 
  • #14
gravenewworld said:
And all at the price of taste?


Have you ever had a real aged steak that was hung to tenderize it from a butcher? It is worlds above what you can buy in any grocery store.

I don't know. However, I have had an imaginary steak once when I was hungry and the next food supply was at about 45 km (~28 miles) walk from my location. But I doubt it would be so fresh if it was hung to tenderize. I'll agree to add taste to my list of requirements for food.
 
  • #15
Hurkyl said:
Not to mention I run a greater risk of getting contaminated food.

This is an excellent point.
 
  • #16
This just has the feel of a generic rant against big companies to me.
 
  • #17
I heard that Sysco puts fluoride in everything! We must protect our precious bodily fluids...

208fy20.jpg
 
  • #18
Regardless of the motivations of posters who may or may not have some axes to grind, there are indeed some advantages to local foods. When I was a kid, we used to hang venison for at least a week before butchering, temperatures permitting. If it was unseasonably warm, we took the deer to a slaughterhouse with proper cold storage and paid a fee for that storage. We would go get the deer after a week or so, and cut it up ourselves, or (rarely) pay the slaughterhouse to butcher and pack it. Night-and-day difference in quality.

When I was a young whippersnapper in the construction industry, I got friendly with a semi-retired plumber who was supervising the plumbers on a project that I was helping to direct. He told me of a time (1910's-1920's) when he ran errands for a wealthy family in Bangor, and one time he was sent to a very large meat-vendor to pick up some filet mignons for a party. He was allowed into the cold-storage area so that he could help lug out the steaks, and saw how the steaks were being aged on racks. When he got back to the family's home, he told the head of the family that he oughtn't buy meat from that place because the meat was all old and moldy-looking. The guy slapped him on the back and tipped him an extra quarter (a fortune to a kid then), laughing all the time.

Eddie was a poor Irish kid, the meat-business was run by a well-to-do Jewish family, and the guy that he did errands for was a descendant of a lumber-baron who made his fortune when Bangor was the lumber capital of the US. Apropos of nothing, perhaps, but it always stuck with me.
 
  • #19
I was watching a documentary program about a year ago and I was kind of grossed out to discover that salami is essentially raw meat that has been chemically cooked by allowing a sort of mold to grow on it. But now I have a great answer to those "If you were going to be a stranded time traveler what would you want to have with you?" hypothetical questions.
 
  • #20
turbo-1 said:
Regardless of the motivations of posters who may or may not have some axes to grind, there are indeed some advantages to local foods.
Sysco also distributes produce from local producers.

And it buys and sells fruits, vegetables and meat from local producers in some markets.
 
  • #21
Evo said:
Sysco also distributes produce from local producers.
Yes, but the distributorship is not transparent about sources. I really don't care, as long as the quality is good, but for home consumption (I can't eat in restaurants anyway) I want properly-aged Black Angus (grown just a few miles away), free-range chickens (same place), properly-handled free-range turkeys (even closer) and vegetables from my garden. You can't buy this stuff in a store, and most times the prices are competitive or less-expensive.
 
  • #22
Hurkyl said:
So your real complaint is simply that the meat isn't prepared the way you like it. Stop trying to blame it on a lack of 'freshness'. :grumpy:



I don't care about a 'real butcher' or a 'real local market' or a 'gourmet pastry chef'. I care about food I like to eat. And quite honestly, I would expect to prefer a cake that was "dethawed from a frozen package" than a cake made by a "gourmet pastry chef". In fact, I have discovered over time that my odds of liking a food is inversely proportional to how 'fancy' it is.

Pizza is one of my favorite foods, but I have never had a pizza I liked from a restaurant that wasn't a speciality pizza place. And while pizza from pizza chains is usually pretty good, in almost every circumstance I prefer the taste of a frozen pizza I reheated myself.

If I bought into this whole "buy fresh foods" nonsense, my quality of life would decrease significantly. :tongue: Not to mention I run a greater risk of getting contaminated food.
:!) Hurkyl, a manly man.
 
  • #23
Hurkyl said:
So your real complaint is simply that the meat isn't prepared the way you like it. Stop trying to blame it on a lack of 'freshness'. :grumpy:



I don't care about a 'real butcher' or a 'real local market' or a 'gourmet pastry chef'. I care about food I like to eat. And quite honestly, I would expect to prefer a cake that was "dethawed from a frozen package" than a cake made by a "gourmet pastry chef". In fact, I have discovered over time that my odds of liking a food is inversely proportional to how 'fancy' it is.

Pizza is one of my favorite foods, but I have never had a pizza I liked from a restaurant that wasn't a speciality pizza place. And while pizza from pizza chains is usually pretty good, in almost every circumstance I prefer the taste of a frozen pizza I reheated myself.

If I bought into this whole "buy fresh foods" nonsense, my quality of life would decrease significantly. :tongue: Not to mention I run a greater risk of getting contaminated food.

Oh so you like bad food. Hey to each his own.

You seem to be heavy on opinion here and light on facts/evidence. I do not eat food that is just heated in a microwave, and it's not at all hard to find fresh food; just look around the perimeter of your grocery store where the fresh produce, meats, butcher, and dairy sections are located. There's also no evidence that this is what restaurants are buying from Sysco. If I want crayfish etouffe and live up in the northern part of the US, I need to buy from someone in the Gulf Coast. A distributor that quickly ships quality crayfish is a good thing, not something to demonize.

Sysco ships to over 400,000 restaurants in the US. Many places you eat at probably use their food even though you wouldn't think they would. Also where does that food come from in the grocery store that is all along the perimeter? You are just assuming that they are of the highest quality.


You seem to be misunderstanding what a distributor is. They are not the producer, they are the agent that connects buyers to producers and helps get the product delivered. If one is especially efficient at getting fresh produce from a West coast producer to an East coast buyer, why would that be a bad thing? They might be popular with restaurants who don't want to call 10 different places to get their weekly orders in if they can call one place that will make all the arrangements for them and deliver it all on one truckload on Wednesday, when they want the delivery to arrive. Nothing says the restaurants are buying convenience foods, or pre-made pastries. Even if the distributor sells those, what evidence do you have that that's what the restaurants are buying? Some do...chain restaurants of course do, but this is no surprise or mystery...nor does it even mean this is the supplier they are getting those foods from.

No. Sysco also ships tons and tons of pre-made frozen food and packaged food that contain lots of preservatives. This is no secret. The bulk of Sysco's profits come from their packaged foods. Many of the soups, cole slaw, salad dressings, etc. that are served in lots of restaurants simply come in massive giant bags that are cut open and warmed up (the soup).

It seems you are for some reason trying to argue based on an emotional reaction to something you have yet to explain, but are light on facts here. If a particular distributor is very efficient at getting quality foods to me on time and while still fresh, why is that a bad thing? Did you think the live Maine lobsters in the grocery store somehow magically arrived directly from Maine without a distributor involved? How do you think food gets around the country? And as Astronuc already provided evidence to support, Sysco does not have a monopoly on this sector. There are other distributors and they have not been driven out of business. Of course, the top restaurants are going to go with the distributor with the top reputation for getting the fresh foods to them while still fresh. None of this is consistent with your claims that the food is not fresh or that people don't care about fresh food.

And you have very little evidence so far to prove your claim that Sysco is providing "fresh food". Once again, the bulk of Sysco's profits don't come from shipping foods like fresh meats and vegetables. Maybe I didn't make myself clear. What I had in mind was the thousand and thousands of premade items from Sysco that restaurants serve, not simply just frozen steaks and veggies. Many restaurants pass off frozen Sysco premade products as menu items of their own. The restaurants don't make them, they just simply heat them up. And there is a reason why restaurants buy these products---it's because they are cheaper which allows for a larger profit margin to be made and they also keep longer and don't spoil because they are loaded with preservatives. The quality meats and produce that Sysco provides probably aren't that much different than what you can get at the store, but this isn't where sysco makes most of their profit.
 
  • #24
gravenewworld said:
...but this isn't where sysco makes most of their profit.

Gasp! How dare they make a profit! The nerve! Why such temerity practically forces you into speciously claiming that they're engaging in monopolistic market-fixing, rather than giving people exactly what they ask for.
 
  • #25
Oh my God! Soylent Green is people!
 
  • #26
People in general don't care about taste anyway. McDonalds/Fast food customers are usually after fat content, salt, caffeine (which are all addictive), and consistency ... And most Fridays, Outback, Olive Garden, etc customers, like the atmosphere, advertising, etc. 5
 
  • #27
turbo-1 said:
Yes, but the distributorship is not transparent about sources. I really don't care, as long as the quality is good, but for home consumption (I can't eat in restaurants anyway) I want properly-aged Black Angus (grown just a few miles away), free-range chickens (same place), properly-handled free-range turkeys (even closer) and vegetables from my garden. You can't buy this stuff in a store, and most times the prices are competitive or less-expensive.

Sysco isn't selling you food. The articles are about restaurants buying food through Sysco, so your home kitchen is still safe.
 
  • #28
Office_Shredder said:
Sysco isn't selling you food. The articles are about restaurants buying food through Sysco, so your home kitchen is still safe.

Ah but they do sell to hospitals so stay healthy.:biggrin:

My son worked for Sysco for several years. They run their company much like Walmart does. They have something like 180 regional very large food distribution centers.
 
  • #29
gravenewworld said:
Oh so you like bad food.
Bad food? Says who? The fact that Sysco is doing well means that they sell good food. Unless, of course, everyone except you likes "bad food". :rolleyes:
Also where does that food come from in the grocery store that is all along the perimeter? You are just assuming that they are of the highest quality.
You can, of course, examine the food at the grocery store before you buy it...
Sysco also ships tons and tons of pre-made frozen food and packaged food that contain lots of preservatives. This is no secret. The bulk of Sysco's profits come from their packaged foods.
So what? I'm still not clear on why you've made this thread. The OP mentioned monopolies, which Sysco is not, and fresh food, which Sysco does provide. I don't get your point: this still seems like a random anti big-company rant.
Many of the soups, cole slaw, salad dressings, etc. that are served in lots of restaurants simply come in massive giant bags that are cut open and warmed up (the soup).
Ok. So what?
And you have very little evidence so far to prove your claim that Sysco is providing "fresh food".
c'mon - you're the one doing random ranting here. You haven't even said what you mean by "fresh". Sysco says it's fresh, so who are we to argue?
Once again, the bulk of Sysco's profits don't come from shipping foods like fresh meats and vegetables.
Soo... you are anti-profit??!?
Maybe I didn't make myself clear.
You certainly have not.
What I had in mind was the thousand and thousands of premade items from Sysco that restaurants serve, not simply just frozen steaks and veggies. Many restaurants pass off frozen Sysco premade products as menu items of their own. The restaurants don't make them, they just simply heat them up. And there is a reason why restaurants buy these products---it's because they are cheaper which allows for a larger profit margin to be made and they also keep longer and don't spoil because they are loaded with preservatives. The quality meats and produce that Sysco provides probably aren't that much different than what you can get at the store, but this isn't where sysco makes most of their profit.
Ok. So if I get the Mozarrella Sticks at TGI Friday's, they're probably premade and frozen. Yah, I get that. It's not news to me and I suspect it isn't news to you - so what is your point? What does that have to do with monopolies and frehsness?

Again, this just sounds like random ranting againsst a successful big company.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
Look, gravenewworld, this is real simple: I've had the $18 Jack Daniels Steak and Shrimp at TGI Friday's and I've had a $65 Fillet and Lobster at a casino in Tahoe. I enjoyed both and and both were worth what I paid for them and I had no illusions about either when I ordered them. So what is wrong with that?

Yah, sometimes people eat food that has been mass-produced and/or frozen. If they know what they are eating, why is that a problem? Are you saying you always eat freshly-killed meat and locally grown vegetables? Are you some kind of elitist? Please tell me you are at least a gourmet chef, because I'll be very disappointed otherwise!
 
  • #31
CaptainQuasar said:
Gasp! How dare they make a profit! The nerve! Why such temerity practically forces you into speciously claiming that they're engaging in monopolistic market-fixing, rather than giving people exactly what they ask for.

GASP! How dare anyone question corporate profits. The market demanded things like subprime loans why should corporate banks be blamed for all the mess that is happening right now?

And in case you didn't read it properly let me state the TITLE OF THE THREAD AGAIN "Sysco monopolizing what we eat?" That is a question, not a statement of fact. I opened a thread to see how people felt about the fact that much of their food may come from a single source.



Bad food? Says who? The fact that Sysco is doing well means that they sell good food. Unless, of course, everyone except you likes "bad food".


Yeah and I bet all those banks that were making huge profits 10 years ago that are now looking for a government hand out made "good loans" too. Profits in no way reflect on quality being provided.

You can, of course, examine the food at the grocery store before you buy it...


Yeah and I'm sure just by eye examining that "fresh" salmon (that probably comes from a massive fish farm) in your grocery store's seasfood section you could have known that it contains more polychlorinated biphenyl contaminants than freshly caught wild salmon.

So what? I'm still not clear on why you've made this thread. The OP mentioned monopolies, which Sysco is not, and fresh food, which Sysco does provide. I don't get your point: this still seems like a random anti big-company rant.


Mentions, monopoly in a question. Doesn't state it as a fact. This is nothing more than opening up a discussion.

Does Sysco provide fresh foods? Yes. Do they also provide a lot of frozen premade stuff? Yes.

Soo... you are anti-profit??!?

Yes, I voted communist this past election.

c'mon - you're the one doing random ranting here. You haven't even said what you mean by "fresh". Sysco says it's fresh, so who are we to argue?

And food manufacturers like craft call their products cheese when in fact they aren't, but just cheese product. Who is anyone to argue that Kraft is not really selling cheese? If they say they are selling cheese they must be doing so right? Do you really need me to post the merriam webster dictionary definition of fresh? I think not. Your are a smart guy.

Ok. So if I get the Mozarrella Sticks at TGI Friday's, they're probably premade and frozen. Yah, I get that. It's not news to me and I suspect it isn't news to you - so what is your point? What does that have to do with monopolies and frehsness?

Again, this just sounds like random ranting againsst a successful big company.

And it's not just TGIF and chain restaurants. Sysco ships to over 400,000 restaurants, which is clearly more than the number of chain restaurants in all of the US, which include your local diners and mom and pop restaurants.

Look, gravenewworld, this is real simple: I've had the $18 Jack Daniels Steak and Shrimp at TGI Friday's and I've had a $65 Fillet and Lobster at a casino in Tahoe. I enjoyed both and and both were worth what I paid for them and I had no illusions about either when I ordered them. So what is wrong with that?

So how does it feel to have paid $18 and $65 for a meal that has a good chance of being nothing more than a frozen TV dinner?


Yah, sometimes people eat food that has been mass-produced and/or frozen. If they know what they are eating, why is that a problem? Are you saying you always eat freshly-killed meat and locally grown vegetables? Are you some kind of elitist? Please tell me you are at least a gourmet chef, because I'll be very disappointed otherwise!

The problem is that people don't always know what they are eating. Restaurants and food suppliers, like turbo pointed out are not transparent about the source of their food at all.

Yes I always eat freshly killed meats and locally grown veggies.

Time to go squirrel hunting in my backyard.
 
  • #32
A company can only be as good as its suppliers. On the other hand they could hire their own food inspectors.

TAMPA - A state investigation into fake grouper showing up in Tampa Bay area restaurants has ended in a settlement with the giant food-service company Sysco Corp., which supplied many of the restaurants serving the bogus grouper.

Owners of restaurants caught up in the probe say they will be more mindful of checking deliveries in the future but it is tough to police fish because many fillets look alike

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/sep/04/na-state-orders-sysco-to-reel-in-false-grouper-cla/ [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
gravenewworld said:
GASP! How dare anyone question corporate profits. The market demanded things like subprime loans why should corporate banks be blamed for all the mess that is happening right now?

And in case you didn't read it properly let me state the TITLE OF THE THREAD AGAIN "Sysco monopolizing what we eat?" That is a question, not a statement of fact. I opened a thread to see how people felt about the fact that much of their food may come from a single source.

Yes, well many of the issues you're bringing up are radically divergent from discussing monopolistic practices, yet you are advancing them while appearing to meticulously avoid the answer to your question, which is a definite and unambiguous "No."

Question corporate profits all you want. Just don't try to pretend, after Astronuc presented numbers showing that Sysco probably doesn't even control half their own market (at least! much less generally control "what we eat!"), that the percentage of their profits derived from food you do not personally find aesthetically pleasing has any relevance whatsoever to whether Sysco is doing anything monopolistic or even remotely underhanded.

If you're going to be carelessly blurring the line between "Sysco has icky food" and "Sysco is committing criminal market fixing" you should expect that people are going to call you on it.
 

What is Sysco and how does it relate to monopolizing what we eat?

Sysco is a multinational corporation that specializes in foodservice distribution. It supplies food and related products to restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, and other institutions. As one of the largest food distributors in the world, Sysco has a significant impact on the food industry and can potentially monopolize certain aspects of what we eat.

How does Sysco monopolize what we eat?

Sysco's size and market power give it significant control over the food supply chain. It can negotiate lower prices with suppliers and offer a wide range of products, making it difficult for smaller distributors to compete. This can result in limited options for restaurants and other institutions, ultimately leading to Sysco having a monopoly on certain food products.

What are the potential consequences of Sysco monopolizing what we eat?

A major consequence of Sysco's monopoly is the lack of competition in the food industry. This can lead to higher prices for consumers and limited choices for restaurants and other institutions. It can also stifle innovation and diversity in the food industry, as smaller businesses may struggle to enter the market or compete with Sysco's dominance.

Is Sysco's monopoly on what we eat legal?

Monopolies are generally not illegal, but they can be subject to antitrust laws if they are using their market power to harm competition. Sysco has faced several antitrust lawsuits in the past, but it has also successfully defended itself against others. Ultimately, the legality of Sysco's monopoly would depend on the specific circumstances and any potential anticompetitive behavior.

What can be done to prevent Sysco from monopolizing what we eat?

There are a few potential solutions to prevent Sysco from monopolizing what we eat. One option is to enforce antitrust laws and regulations to ensure fair competition in the food industry. Another solution could be to support and promote smaller, local food distributors to increase competition. Additionally, consumers can also choose to support smaller businesses and buy from a variety of sources to avoid contributing to Sysco's monopoly.

Similar threads

  • Poll
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
78
Views
9K
Replies
109
Views
53K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top