1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

System in equilibrium

  1. Mar 2, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A light rod is holding a weight with mass m in equilibrium. The rod is attached to the wall with a hinge and a wire as shown on the figure.

    http://sveskekat.dk/files/uploads/phys_4.PNG [Broken]

    Problem:
    Draw a force diagram of the rod and determine the force with which the hinge affects the rod and the tension force in the wire.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I did the force diagram as shown on the figure, with the green arrows as the forces.
    I want to determine
    The force with which the hinge affects the rod, Fc.
    The tension force in the wire, T.

    I have that Ww = mg.

    I wrote up the conditions for equilibrium,
    [tex]\sum F_x = F_c - T cos(45) = 0[/tex]
    [tex]\sum F_y = T sin(45) - W_r - mg = 0[/tex]

    I do torque around the attachment point on the wall,
    [tex]\sum \tau = 2amg + aW_r - aF_c = 0[/tex]

    But trying to solve for e.g. [tex]F_c[/tex] now gives me
    [tex]F_c = cos(45) \frac{F_c - mg}{sin(45)} = F_c - mg[/tex],
    which is kinda bad. What am I doing wrong??
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 2, 2009 #2

    PhanthomJay

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Since it is given that the rod is light, you can ignore W_r. But you are forgetting the vertical reaction at O.
     
  4. Mar 2, 2009 #3
    Hi Jay, thanks. I will ignore W_r then. How should the vertical reaction at O look like? Should it be another component, or should it be part of F_c?

    Thanks.
     
  5. Mar 2, 2009 #4

    PhanthomJay

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Call it a component O_y, acting vertical, perpendicular to F_c (which you probably should be referring to as O_x instead of F_c).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: System in equilibrium
  1. Systems in equilibrium (Replies: 2)

Loading...