- #1

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

**[lambda]=3/(2x) = 1/(2y) = 1/(3z) with constraint eq. x^2+2y^2+6z^2=1**

## The Attempt at a Solution

- I can't figure out how to solve this system of equations. Can somebody please help.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter snoggerT
- Start date

- #1

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

- I can't figure out how to solve this system of equations. Can somebody please help.

- #2

Defennder

Homework Helper

- 2,592

- 5

- #3

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

- yeah, thats way simpler than I was making it. So I would take lambda and plug back in to find my x, y, z, right?

- #4

Defennder

Homework Helper

- 2,592

- 5

Yes that's right.

- #5

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

Yes that's right.

- so I get lambda to be +/- sqrt(41/12), which can be reduced to +/- 1/2*sqrt(41/3), but that gets somewhat ugly when plugging back in to find my x,y,z. I'm trying to find the min/max on this problem, so I have to find my x,y,z to plug back into the f(x,y,z) function. Is there any way to simplify things further?

- #6

rocomath

- 1,755

- 1

Wait wait! You're solving for lambda?

[tex]\lambda=\frac{3}{2x}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{2y}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{3z}[/tex]

Set them equal to each other so that you have y = ... in terms of x and z = ... in terms of x so you can plug it back into your equation to solve for x.

[tex]\lambda=\frac{3}{2x}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{2y}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{3z}[/tex]

Set them equal to each other so that you have y = ... in terms of x and z = ... in terms of x so you can plug it back into your equation to solve for x.

Last edited:

- #7

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

Wait wait! You're solving for lambda?

[tex]\lambda=\frac{3}{2x}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{2y}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{3z}[/tex]

Set them equal to each other so that you have y = ... in terms of x and z = ... in terms of x so you can plug it back into your equation to solve for x.

- so I get +/- sqrt(27/41) for x, is that right?

- #8

rocomath

- 1,755

- 1

Hmm, what did you do?- so I get +/- sqrt(27/41) for x, is that right?

- #9

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

Hmm, what did you do?

- I set 3/(2x)= 1/(2y) and got y in terms of x and did the same for z. then plugged into the constraint equation and solved for x. I'm guessing I did it wrong though.

- #10

rocomath

- 1,755

- 1

[tex]y=\frac x 3[/tex]

[tex]z=\frac 2 9 x[/tex]

[tex]z=\frac 2 9 x[/tex]

- #11

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

[tex]y=\frac x 3[/tex]

[tex]z=\frac 2 9 x[/tex]

- thats what I got for y and z, so I must of done something wrong with my algebra in the constraint equation. Let me work it again.

- #12

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

x^2+2(x/3)^2+6(2x/9)^2=1

- #13

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,263

- 620

This is a lagrange multiplier problem isn't it? Can you state the original problem?

- #14

snoggerT

- 186

- 0

This is a lagrange multiplier problem isn't it? Can you state the original problem?

- sure. I probably need to start over anyways because I think I'm just confusing myself.

find the min/max:

f(x,y,z)=3x+2y+4z with constraint equation x^2+2y^2+6z^2=1

- #15

Dick

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 26,263

- 620

Ok, I think you are on completely the right track. lambda^2=12/41 is what I get too. And yes, x=+/-sqrt(27/41). I'll admit the numbers aren't that pretty. But I think you are doing exactly the right thing. Just keep on doing it.

Last edited:

Share:

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 672

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 489

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 739

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 457

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 509

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 624

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 440

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 324

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 318

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 315