Sze Eq. 38

  • Thread starter mzh
  • Start date
  • #1
mzh
64
0
Dear PF users
What is the rationale for Sze to write the exponential terms in ch. 1, Eq. 38 once as
[itex]\exp \left[ -\frac{E_C - E_F}{kT} \right] [/itex] and once as [itex]\exp \left[ \frac{E_F - E_D}{kT} \right] [/itex]?
In both cases [itex]E_F[/itex] is larger than either [itex]E_C[/itex] or [itex]E_D[/itex]. To me, for the sake of not having to worry about correctly placing minus signs as in the first term, it would seem most consistent to always subtract the lower from the larger term. Why is he not doing this here?

Thanks for comments.
 

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on Sze Eq. 38

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top