Tachyons, Is this fellow right?

  • Thread starter Tyger
  • Start date
In summary, the article discusses the theory that particles with "rest momentum" travel faster than light. The author finds this theory to be unsophisticated and suggests that it may be flawed. He also suggests that tachyons may be useful in explaining certain phenomena on a larger scale.
  • #1
Tyger
398
0
http://www.sheol.org/throopw/tachyon-pistols.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sure, since Einstein formukated SR it's been know that FTL travel causes backwards in time travel.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by jcsd
Sure, since Einstein formulated SR it's been know that FTL travel causes backwards in time travel.

The reasoning in the article seemed pretty unsophisticated, I was just wondering if someone had known about it before and found any flaws in it. I'll go over the problem myself in a bit, do a few thought expermiments, etc..

I should say that Tachyons have become a part of "pop science" and have suffered because of it. Also I find many of the explanations in the scientific literature to be specious and inaccurate, such as their having an "imaginary mass". Because there isn't a linear relationship between momentum and velocity the concept of inertia simply doesn't apply to them, period.

And I suspect that they may be useful in explaining some things on the larger scale, such as the presence of magnetic fields and solar activity. This would all involve "long wave" tachyons, shortwave ones, those with wavelengths comparable to the electon comptom wavelength for instance, would make the vacuum very unstable and be easily found in experiments. But longwave ones would explain such things as the solar flux tubes, the ambient heating of the Sun's corona, etc., very elegantly.
 
  • #4
Special relativity is a simple theory, I didn't check the maths but I can see nothing qualitively wrong with what he said.

In te standard model of a tachyon they DO have an imaginery REST MASS, though I've seen other models that attempt to describe FTL particles with real rest masses. It should be noted though that tachyons are more of an interesting articfact arising from relativity rather than real phenomena.
 
  • #5
Here's another link on the subject.

It presents a different interpretation based on Generalized Galilean coordinates which doesn't have the time travel problem.

http://www.geocities.com/tsaochang/

I've always thought it interesting that while the Lorentz transformation is a symmetry group it has an asymmetry associated with it, namely that it "favors" a special velocity.

I was somewhat doubtful of the conclusion that particles with "rest momentum" would travel faster that light till I solved the equation for the group velocity, but it turned out to be the case.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
So far what I have,

first is he's wrong, using the wrong Lorentz transform for the tachyons. There are three Lorentz transforms (the stuff Einstein didn't tell us) one for timelike world lines, one for light like world lines and one for space like world lines. Needless to say the light like one is the limiting case of the other two. When the two contestants are moving away from each other the tachyons speed up, using the proper transformation, so the backward in time business doesn't happen.
 

What are tachyons?

Tachyons are hypothetical particles that travel faster than the speed of light. They have not been observed in experiments, but they are predicted by some theories in physics.

What is the significance of tachyons?

Tachyons have been proposed as a way to achieve faster-than-light communication or travel. However, their existence is still a topic of debate and there is currently no evidence to support their existence.

What is the scientific evidence for tachyons?

Currently, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of tachyons. Some theories in physics predict their existence, but these theories have not been confirmed by experiments.

How are tachyons different from other particles?

Tachyons are different from other particles because they are predicted to travel faster than the speed of light. This is in contrast to all other known particles, which are limited by the speed of light.

Is the idea of tachyons accepted by the scientific community?

The existence of tachyons is still a topic of debate in the scientific community. Some theories predict their existence, but there is currently no experimental evidence to support it. Many scientists remain skeptical until there is stronger evidence for their existence.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
957
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
4
Views
369
Back
Top