In stewart, page 806 he says:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"In the special case in which the equation of a surface S is of the form z=f(x,y) (that is, S is the graph of a function f of two variables), we can write the equation as

F(x,y,z) = f(x,y) - z = 0

and regard S as a level surface (with k=0) of F. Then

Fx(x0,y0,z0) = fx(x0,y0)

Fy(x0,y0,z0) = fy(x0,y0)

Fz(x0,y0,z0)= -1 "

end quote

I understand his moving z to the other side.

But when the take the derivative W.R.T x, what about the z? z is not a variable, z is a functin of x and y, so why dont u have some dz/dx term in there, Fx(x0,y0,z0)=fx(x0,y0) -dz/dx . How did z no longer become a dependent variable on x and y?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Taking the derivative

Loading...

Similar Threads - Taking derivative | Date |
---|---|

What is meant by "take the derivative of a function"? | Sep 28, 2015 |

Correct terminology for taking differentials? | Dec 7, 2014 |

Can I state that a of n is decreasing w/o taking the derivative | Oct 8, 2013 |

Leibniz notation when taking derivatives! | Sep 15, 2012 |

How to take the Partial Derivatives of a Function that is Defined Implicitly? | Nov 15, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**