0http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34833391/tannor-quantum-mechanics-derivative-of-variance-of-position# [Broken](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In the Tannor textbook Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, there is a second derivative of chi on p37. It looks like this:

χ"(t) = d/dt ( (1/m) * (<qp + pq> - 2<p><q> ) (Equation 1)

Where χ is the variance of position, or χ= <q^2> - <q>^2 and q is position and p is momentum, and m is mass. Eventually this equation transforms into the following:

χ"(t) = (2/(m^{2})) * ( <p^{2}> - <p>^{2}- m*V"(<q>)*χ) (Equation 2)

There is obviously Ehrenfest theorem used here. I found that the first term inside the bracket in Equation 1 goes to 0 using integrals. The second becomes the following:

(2/m)*d/dt(<p><q>)

= (2/(m^{2}))(m*<q>V'(<q>)-m*(<q>*q-<q>^{2})V"(<q>) - <p>^{2})

and now I'm stuck. What's the next step? How do I get <p^{2}>?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Tannor Quantum Mechanics derivative of variance of position

Loading...

Similar Threads - Tannor Quantum Mechanics | Date |
---|---|

B Quantum theory for high-school students | Today at 5:22 AM |

I Indices of a Density Matrix | Monday at 8:04 PM |

I Two coherent sources | Sunday at 10:20 PM |

I For a particle on a sphere, is zero energy possible? | Saturday at 12:56 PM |

A Is non-linear quantum mechanics (even) plausible? | Friday at 8:16 PM |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**