- #36
SanguineHorizon
- 8
- 0
The natural laws, firstly, are just that - natural. We have no control over them, and limited understanding of them. Why could they not change? The universe is far from coherent, and if memory serves me, the scientific community is -still- trying to validate the 'big bang' theory - one that remains unproven. Fundamental 'laws' are changed every day in order to have this idea or that theory work. That is the process of science, and the scientific community would do well to remember it's past and it's fallibility.
Telekinesis is not possible.
1. There are no mechanisms in the human body that allow for controlling of objects with the human "mind". - Incorrect. The abnomoly know as 'crop circles' has been attributed to sound, of incredibly high pitch - which by rights should incinerate the plants, yet all it does is create a couple of tiny little holes to let the evaporated water out of the (now bent and elongated) stems. There is no such mechanism that science has yet determined to account for this. The cellular structure of the soil below these warped plants is changed - something that takes thousands of years and incredible pressure - still no mechanism described by science. Why is that? Oh yeah, that's right, we don't know everything.
2. Quite a few Laws of Physics (i.e. Thermodynamics and Laws of Motion) will be violated (keep in mind that "forces" are not a substance). - The laws of physics are only employed when it is to science's advantage. Consider the Creation of the universe. How can an effect manifest without a cause? So too the vibration of every tiny piece of matter in existence. What is the cause to the effect? Again the incompetency of our explanations of the working universe is made clear.
3. All instances of supposed telekinesis always have natural mundane causes (i.e. They are not telekinesis). Example of "telekinesis": In 1974, members of the Toronto Society for Psychical Research decided to 'create' a ghost. 'Philip' they named him, and gave him a history, image and filled in the gaps. Much to their delight, 'Philip' began to manifest as various phenomena associated with Telekinisis/Poltergeist activity. This was recorded on tape, on television, and in the prescence of 'orthodox' testers and large crowds. 'Philip's' behaviour changed depending on those 'calling' him. For example, when a non smoker was in the group, 'Philip' became agitated and aggressive if someone smoked.
It's all very easy to say 'there is no evidence' of such-and-such an anomoly, but ask yourself this - have you looked?
Telekinesis is not possible.
1. There are no mechanisms in the human body that allow for controlling of objects with the human "mind". - Incorrect. The abnomoly know as 'crop circles' has been attributed to sound, of incredibly high pitch - which by rights should incinerate the plants, yet all it does is create a couple of tiny little holes to let the evaporated water out of the (now bent and elongated) stems. There is no such mechanism that science has yet determined to account for this. The cellular structure of the soil below these warped plants is changed - something that takes thousands of years and incredible pressure - still no mechanism described by science. Why is that? Oh yeah, that's right, we don't know everything.
2. Quite a few Laws of Physics (i.e. Thermodynamics and Laws of Motion) will be violated (keep in mind that "forces" are not a substance). - The laws of physics are only employed when it is to science's advantage. Consider the Creation of the universe. How can an effect manifest without a cause? So too the vibration of every tiny piece of matter in existence. What is the cause to the effect? Again the incompetency of our explanations of the working universe is made clear.
3. All instances of supposed telekinesis always have natural mundane causes (i.e. They are not telekinesis). Example of "telekinesis": In 1974, members of the Toronto Society for Psychical Research decided to 'create' a ghost. 'Philip' they named him, and gave him a history, image and filled in the gaps. Much to their delight, 'Philip' began to manifest as various phenomena associated with Telekinisis/Poltergeist activity. This was recorded on tape, on television, and in the prescence of 'orthodox' testers and large crowds. 'Philip's' behaviour changed depending on those 'calling' him. For example, when a non smoker was in the group, 'Philip' became agitated and aggressive if someone smoked.
It's all very easy to say 'there is no evidence' of such-and-such an anomoly, but ask yourself this - have you looked?