Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Telomere length

  1. Nov 12, 2007 #1
    How long could you make/lengthen the telomere of a cell?
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 12, 2007 #2

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Cells don't have a telomere, chromosomes do. Telomeres are special DNA sequences that are found at the end of a chromosome - important in the replication and stability of DNA molecules during mitosis and meiosis.
  4. Nov 12, 2007 #3
    Sorry...I don't know why I mentioned the word cell I know what a telomere is, I just didn't write down what I was thinking correctly..I had too many things in my mind at once lol

    How long can a telomere be lengthened? Is my question
  5. Nov 12, 2007 #4
    There is an enzyme called telomerase which repairs the telomeres after a cell division. It doesn't lengthen them so much as maintain their size.
  6. Nov 14, 2007 #5

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    AFAIK there is no way to make telomeres longer. Ian probably has a more definitive answer.

    Based on your previous posts, does this question have something to do with cell lifetimes or apoptosis?
  7. Nov 14, 2007 #6
    no not really, I mean I just realized I didn't know how long a telomere could be so I asked the question
  8. Nov 14, 2007 #7

    jim mcnamara

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The reason is some researchers have proposed that (hypothetically) shortening telomores would reult in increased DNA damage over time, lengthening them, less damage. ie., possibly greater cell longevity.
  9. Nov 14, 2007 #8
    The telomere protects the end of the DNA strand (maybe like those anglets on shoelaces? :) ). Some of the telomere is lost whenever the cell divides. Without a telomere, the part of the DNA that stores data begins to take damage.
  10. Nov 24, 2007 #9
    What's the maximum lifespan you think we could live using our knowledge of telomeres and why do you think that? I just keep reading people saying that you could live a really really long time using that technology
  11. Nov 24, 2007 #10
    Wow. That's really entering a world of unknowns. So.. lets speculate a bit here. Telomerase should prevent spontaneous cell deth through aging, and should greatly reduce DNA damage during mitosis. Let's ignore the dangers of cancer implied by use of temerase. So.. whats left?

    Permanent damage to the body will still accumulate: broken bones that dont quite heal right, etc. DNA damage will still occur and be passed down to filial cells. If any cells become so damaged as to die, they will be replaced.. but you still have to be concerned with different parts of your body drifting genetically. It's hard to say what the results of this may be, but it seems like cancer would eventually be inevitable. Nerve cells will still not be replaced. Even assuming you dont develop Alzheimer's or other rapid degeneration, you should still find your metal faculties declining and your memory fading. Eventually, you may live 150 years but remember only 10 of them.

    Bottomline. It's hard to say. People have alot of pie in the sky notions about telomerase, but we don't really know what problems are unrelated to aging, which problems are related to aging, and which problems are prevented by aging (telomerase inhibition had to evolve for some reason). It's entirely possible that, once telomerase in given to humans to prevent aging, a whole panoply of new problems may be discovered.
  12. Nov 25, 2007 #11


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I was involved with a study on telemeres and their role in cancer. A cell that has had apoptosis turned off by a mutation is also known as a cancer cell. With apoptosis turned off (that is the p52 gene turned off) the telomeres of the chromosomes in that cell do not degenerate or rather they don't begin to lose information (ie: genes) like normal cells do when they age. This is why the cell can be called an "immortal" cell or...... cancer cell.

    There was an initiative to find a way to deplete the telomeres in cancer cells so that the cell would die or at least become useless in division (mitosis) and act less like a cancerous stem cell. This would be achieved and was achieved by introducing an "anti-telemerase".

    To learn more about teleomeres and the people who have studied them you could check out "the story of teleomeres" in this compilation of abstracts and histories.

    Find pp 30 to read a short history of the study of telomeres and the implications it has to do with aging and cancer.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 23, 2017
  13. Dec 6, 2007 #12

    Geron is doing research into controlled Telomerase activation http://www.geron.com/showpage.asp?code=prodta [Broken] for the purposes of rejuvenation
    while simultaneously pursuing telomerase inhibition http://www.geron.com/showpage.asp?code=prodcati [Broken] as a cancer treatment. Telomolecular Nanotechnology is using a different set of approaches http://www.telomolecular.com/nanocircles.asp [Broken] and http://www.telomolecular.com/otrt.asp [Broken]

    As to your implied central question, technologies to lengthen telomeres will probably have a positive effect on lifespan but will not create the 500 year or 1,000 year life spans being touted by Michael Fossel or Aubrey de Grey. On the other hand, a comprehensive review of the literature on mtDNA, cloned and transplanted organs http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...Homepage&in_article_id=413551&in_page_id=1770
    artificial organs http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2002/artificiallung.htm [Broken] etc. will lead the objective and critical intellect to the conclusion that mean, median and ultimate human lifespans will be increasing at somewhat more than the historical rate for the foreseeable future.


    Michael Ferguson
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  14. Dec 27, 2007 #13
    Cancer cells have a breakage-fusion-bridge cycle involving absent/broken telomeres constantly being fused and broken apart at random, leading to improper chromosome segregation/replication during cell division, thereby giving these cells the ability to mutate and "evolve" rapidly.
  15. Dec 27, 2007 #14
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 23, 2017
  16. May 9, 2008 #15
    How much does telomerase reduce DNA damage during mitosis? and in what ways/to what areas of the body? (I know it wouldn't help with DNA damage in the brain)
  17. May 10, 2008 #16
    I mean based on this sentence my question is

    The telomere protects the end of the DNA strand (maybe like those anglets on shoelaces? :) ). Some of the telomere is lost whenever the cell divides. Without a telomere, the part of the DNA that stores data begins to take damage.

    could telomeres (theoretically) protect DNA from oxidative DNA damage, or does it only protect DNA when the cell replicates?

    I had another question (Ignore all the ones other than these two? Although if you answer the other ones that still helps me) Does Oxygen get converted to free radicals inside of the brain at all? Thanks

    Also would this be helpful? http://www.zealandpublishing.co.nz/CoQ10-Omega3.html Did it really extend animal life 56%?

    The life extending quality of CoQ10 is also confirmed in animal studies. In an experiment repeated three times by Dr E. G. Bliznakov, mice given extra CoQ10 lived 56% longer than average.

    Dr Bliznakov reports, "Equally fascinating was the fact that the quality of youthful life was maintained well into the animals’ extended life spans. They still had healthy glossy coats and little, or none of the expected signs of aging like patchy loss of fur, organ degeneration and lack of mobility."

    In another experiment, this time by Dr E. G. Bliznakov, sedentary human volunteers were given 60 mg of CoQ10 for 8 weeks, with equally impressive results. He writes, "In this short time their hearts were able to display an increase in oxygen utilization and their maximal exercise loads improved dramatically. This improvement was achieved without additional exercise of any type." These results were not achievable using synthetic CoQ10, only using naturally fermented CoQ10.

    Finally, if you have stem cells with original DNA, will they still turn into cells with DNA damage when put into an environment where there are only cells with DNA damage?

    this post is the one where the questions are the most important to me..you can ignore all the other questions that would be okay but if you answer them that's also really nice..thanks
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 23, 2017
  18. Jun 9, 2008 #17
    So would you actually have perfect/flawless non wrinkled skin etc if you had maintained telomeres throughout your life? I thought they were factors other than telomere maintenance involved in skin thinning etc?
    I heard there was prosthetic skin, but that can't be used as an alternative to our natural skin all over our bodies right?
    Also I heard in China they were doing embryonic stem cell therapy; is it possible that if for example there was no immune system reaction they could completely regenerate an organ using as many embryonic stem cells as possible? why/why not?
    Also when they hooked up the blood of an older mouse to a younger mouse, did it completely regenerate organs other than the liver/muscle, could it, if so which organs?
    Also I heard they grew a heart using stem cells (outside of the body) in a lab could they do that with skin?
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2008
  19. Jun 9, 2008 #18
    never mind about the prosthetic skin question though...the only questions I wanted answers to were the answers in the post directly above this one...so if you answered those that would be cool

    I meant, can they grow skin in vivo not in vitro (my friend said they could grow a heart in vivo?)
    And also can the MRL mice regenerate their skin fully? (The strain of mice that can regenerate)

    the post directly above this one and this post are the only questions that I wanted answers to..thanks
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2008
  20. Jul 3, 2008 #19
    please ignore all my questions other than the ones mentioned in this post here or elsewhere as I either got them answered or they ended up being irrelevant/kind of stupid questions. but I would really appreciate having the ones in this post answered.

    The following questions are in regards to consistently having telomeres be the most beneficial length that it's possible to make them in regards to specifically having the best effect on reversing/preventing etc the aging of organs in each specific organ as a result of telomere maintenance gene therapy/protein manipulation. I don't know if anyone here knows this but could someone tell me the actual effect telomere maintenance (ie the form of that's the most likely to help with aged organs) had on aged/aging mouse organs specifically by answering the following questions? (these questions are in regards to the experiment where it would have had the most beneficial effect, or the experiment that somebody can determine the most that it most likely had the most beneficial effect, on an aging organ(s)) Did it completely reverse/prevent/anything the age of any of them (on the organ(s) that it helped with aging the most) (disregarding/pretending (when answering these questions) that the damage that was done from the gene therapy/telomere maintenance itself such as from the nanoparticles used to do the telomere gene therapy ie to replace a gene with a more active one, or to simply increase the amount of telomerase etc doesn't exist- just for the sake of answering the question since Im trying to think of the answer in a specific context) (and disregarding/pretending that there were no side effects like an increased risk of cancer etc from the telomere gene therapy just for the sake of answering the question since I'm trying to think of the answer in a specific context) or if not did it very much ie almost completely reverse/prevent/anything the aging of any of them? (on the organ(s) that it helped with aging the most) and tell me why that is your opinion/fact if possible? (especially since I want to make sure I don't get misinformation on this and confuse myself more) thanks for your time...I know there's some stuff not understand about telomeres...but can my questions in this post be answered 100%/how accurately?
    Somebody somewhere said with telomere maintenance you would die with flawless skin (ie skin that's one 100% not affected by aging?) is that true?
    Also when answering this if you think the effects would be different on humans by an amount that matters, please state how you think that the answers to my questions would be different if my question was about humans and not mice

    * if the telomere maintenance would have the best effect from birth than keep that in mind when deciding which experiment(s) to use to answer my questions...even if that hasn't been done since it could be done if the experiment u're thinking of hasn't been done but you think it would be the one to answer my question with best given my requests then please state that it hasn't been done and just do your best to answer anyway. If the experiment that you're using to answer the question doesn't involve all the variables I want it to- ie having telomeres be the most beneficial length it's possible to make them in regards to aging- please note what it doesn't match in regards to what I wanted it to. Although obviously there can be unknown information; maybe just state what information is unknown if it's going to be in the answers to my questions (in this post)

    Really really appreciate it
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2008
  21. Jul 3, 2008 #20
    basically the short version of my question is could/would altering telomere length theoretically completely reverse/prevent the aging of any one or more organs...if anybody could answer that with 100% certainty/thereabouts that's the only question I want answered but it would also be nice to have the post right above this one replied to..thanks for your time
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook