1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Tennis ball and quantum behaviour

  1. Feb 25, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Attached.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I've attached it. I'm not sure if I've gone wrong somewhere; I've got an extremely high quantum number, but I guess that should be expected considering we're dealing with macroscopic objects. Could someone kindly check to see if I've got it right so far. And if so, how do I carry out the last part of the question? The part about estimating the smallest fractional change QM allows and are these effects perceptible to us. I'm not quite sure how to tackle that part.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 5.8.jpg
      5.8.jpg
      File size:
      20.4 KB
      Views:
      60
    • u.JPG
      u.JPG
      File size:
      40.8 KB
      Views:
      60
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 25, 2014 #2

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The image of your work is pretty dark and hard to read. Can you try taking a better photo? Or else scan it. Or maybe do some image processing on the image to lighten it and increase the contrast.

    or else just type it into the forum -- that is usually the best.
     
  4. Feb 25, 2014 #3
    Hi.
    I didn't check the final numerical result but your reasoning and equations are correct and, indeed, n should be very big given the mass and energy involved.
    You don't need to mention gravity since the quantum system is one-dimensional, along the direction where the ball is kicked (clearly this whole problem is not rigorous, it's just a way to make you see the scale at which quantum behaviors become noticeable).

    For the last part, what would be the change in energy if n change by one unit? how does it compare to the total energy?
     
  5. Feb 25, 2014 #4
    I let n=1.22*10^35 from n=1.21*10^35. The change in energy is rather miniscule; only out by a few joules. Am I understanding you correctly?
     
  6. Feb 25, 2014 #5
    I apologise for that, how's it now?
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Feb 25, 2014 #6
    Let n = 1, so that ΔE = h2/8mL
    The change is completely negligible indeed (as 1<<10^35, in fact), so how does the tennis player feel about the difference?
     
  8. Feb 25, 2014 #7
    Aha now I get it! Thanks a lot :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted