Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Tensor contraction proof

  1. Feb 3, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Show that the definition [of tensor contraction]

    [tex] A^{ae}{}_{cde} = u^a \nu^e \sigma_c \tau_d \omega_e + w^a x^e \zeta_c \eta_d \xi_e + ... [/tex]

    implies

    [tex] A^{im}{}_{klm} \equiv \sum_{m=0}^{n-1} A^{im}{}_{klm} [/tex]

    first by looking at tensors of the form [tex] u^a \sigma_b [/tex], then of the form [tex] u^a...\nu^b \sigma_c... \tau_d [/tex], and finally of linear combinations of these.


    2. Relevant equations

    We're working in Minkowski space, so we have n basis vectors.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I guess I've been thinking I'll just expand into a basis. Does that make sense for this? Here's what happens (if I'm getting notation correctly):

    [tex] A^a_b = u^a \sigma_b = a^a_i e^i a_b^j e_j [/tex]

    so if a = b = m, then

    [tex] A^m_m = a^m_i e^i a^j_m e_j = a^m_i a^j_m \delta^i_j [/tex]

    and then (this is the part I'm not sure about...)

    [tex] A^m_m \equiv \sum_m a^m_i a^j_m \delta^i_j = \sum_m A^m_m [/tex]

    If that is correct I have no problems generalizing to higher rank tensors, just wasn't sure if the sum was introduced correctly. I guess I'm thinking that this is only non-zero for i = j, and then we can sum over m to get all the components... is that right?
     
  2. jcsd
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted