Not sure if this is the right place for this but...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am a bit confused about taking derivatives of tensors. Let's say I have some tensors, R, S and T, and an expression like

[tex] R^{abc} \nabla_a S_{bcd} T^{d}[/tex].

Do I contract on the d index inside, to get an expression like

[tex] R^{abc} \nabla_a U_{bc}[/tex] where U is a new tensor,

then contract with the R tensor on the outside, e.g.

[tex] \nabla_a V^{a}[/tex] where V is yet another tensor? Or, can I not contract at all with things that are on two different sides of a differential operator?

I am also confused as to why suddenly the derivatives of scalars don't vanish... I guess the idea is that a derivative should raise the index of a tensor, and since a scalar is a rank 0 tensor, one index should go to 1. But why? I don't intuitively have a good feel for it (i.e., how does the derivative of a scalar act as a map that takes a vector as its argument?).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Tensor contraction question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Tensor contraction question | Date |
---|---|

A Tensor symmetries and the symmetric groups | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Tensors vs linear algebra | Jan 28, 2018 |

B Tensor Product, Basis Vectors and Tensor Components | Nov 24, 2017 |

I Matrix for transforming vector components under rotation | Sep 17, 2017 |

Contraction Transform | Aug 3, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**