In John Lee's books "Introduction to smooth manifolds" and "Riemannian manifolds", a tensor of type [tex]\begin{pmatrix}k\\ l\end{pmatrix}[/tex] on a vector space V is defined as a member of(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\underbrace{V^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V^*}_{k}\otimes\underbrace{V\otimes\cdots\otimes V}_{l}[/tex]

or as a multilinear function

[tex]\underbrace{V^*\times\cdots\times V^*}_{l}\times\underbrace{V\times\cdots\times V}_{k}\rightarrow\mathbb R[/tex]

or, when [itex]l>0[/itex], as a multilinear function

[tex]\underbrace{V^*\times\cdots\times V^*}_{l-1}\times\underbrace{V\times\cdots\times V}_{k}\rightarrow V[/tex]

(These three vector spaces are isomorphic). But in Wald's "General relativity", this is called a tensor of type [itex](l,k)[/itex]. I just want to ask, is this a "math vs. physics" thing, like when physicsts make their inner products antilinear in the first variable and mathematicians make theirs antilinear in the second? Or is there a standard convention that one of these guys is ignoring?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Tensor of type (k,l)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Tensor type | Date |
---|---|

I Basic Q about Vector/tensor definition and velocity | Feb 24, 2018 |

I Lie derivative of a metric determinant | Dec 22, 2017 |

I Deduce Geodesics equation from Euler equations | Dec 7, 2017 |

A On the dependence of the curvature tensor on the metric | Nov 2, 2017 |

Types of rotations | Sep 4, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**