Could you post a link to somewhere other than the physics forums? I know many of us can't actually see attachment files on the site for whatever reason...
It seems a bit strange that only one subforum has the attachments only viewable to PF contributors though.
All attachments must be approved, but before they have been approved , the attachment says "attachment pending approval" and doesn't provide a clickable link.
The encryption on p9? (Jeez, do these guys ever not know how to format a document!)
Yeah I was wondering whether people would get that question 8 or if i should post the page number.
Wrong.
:zzz:Yeah,I've always had a feeling that this part of PF is the crapiest one.cristo said:
No wonder it's a test for exceptional intelligence. :tongue:
The Haselbauer-Dickheiser test was designed to test intelligence in the range of 180 and greater.
There was never a time limit given (as far as i know) but I presume when it was used you'd get a reasonable amount of time 2-3h or something.
Which encompasses less than 1% of the world's population, I assume (I have the phrase "Less than 1% of the worlds population has an IQ over 135" in my head but I am not sure if that's correct. The picture looks valid in my head though!).
Are you referring to #9? The cryptogram?
Or those good at maths methinks, I think artists with no formal training in maths with an IQ of 180+ would be screwed by this test.:rofl: IQ tests are so arbitrary. Test creativity: now there's the problem, until you can an IQ test is as meaningless as any of the silly tests posted on this forum: are you a pervert, IQ asks one question, how have you been educated, and do you have inate ability, if we placed genius solely in the realms of IQ 180+ we'd have a very slim field. Feynman to name but one. I'd put him above anyone with an IQ of 180+, because intelligence unapplied is as pointless and arbitrary as a number called IQ. IQ tests are curiosities nothing more nothing less.
Hey I never made the test I merely stated what it claimed it was designed for