Testability of Torsion in Teleparallel Gravity - V.C. de Andrade et al

  • Thread starter bcrowell
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Torsion
In summary, this conversation discusses teleparallel gravity and its properties, such as the field equations, energy-momentum density, equivalence principle, and the role of torsion in comparison to curvature in general relativity. It also brings up the confusion of whether torsion is just a different way of describing the same physics in GR or if it has a different effect on spinning matter. The discussion also touches on the recent popularity of f(T) theory, which promotes the torsion scalar of TEGR to a function.
  • #1
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
6,724
429
Mentz114 posted this interesting link: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0011087
Teleparallel Gravity: An Overview
Authors: V. C. de Andrade, L. C. T. Guillen, J. G. Pereira
Abstract: The fundamentals of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity are presented, and its main properties described. In particular, the field equations, the definition of an energy--momentum density for the gravitational field, the teleparallel version of the equivalence principle, and the dynamical role played by torsion as compared to the corresponding role played by curvature in general relativity, are discussed in some details.

This confuses me, because it makes it clear that empirically observable phenomena can be attributed to either curvature or torsion, and yet there are also people, e.g., at UW, doing experimental searches for torsion, which is usually assumed to have spin as its source:
http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/publications/pdf/lowfrontier2.pdf [Broken]
This type of thing is discussed here:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/torsion.html
MTW has a discussion on p. 250 where they say that torsion would violate the e.p. E.g., if the UW Eot-Wash group got a non-null result from their spin-polarized torsion pendulum, it would clearly be a violation of the e.p., since it would be a composition-dependent motion in a gravitational field.

So are there some types of torsion that are empirically testable, violate the e.p., and are inconsistent with GR, while other types of torsion are just a different way of describing the same physics of GR?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bcrowell said:
Mentz114 posted this interesting link: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0011087
Teleparallel Gravity: An Overview
Authors: V. C. de Andrade, L. C. T. Guillen, J. G. Pereira
Abstract: The fundamentals of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity are presented, and its main properties described. In particular, the field equations, the definition of an energy--momentum density for the gravitational field, the teleparallel version of the equivalence principle, and the dynamical role played by torsion as compared to the corresponding role played by curvature in general relativity, are discussed in some details.

This confuses me, because it makes it clear that empirically observable phenomena can be attributed to either curvature or torsion, and yet there are also people, e.g., at UW, doing experimental searches for torsion, which is usually assumed to have spin as its source:
http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/publications/pdf/lowfrontier2.pdf [Broken]
This type of thing is discussed here:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/torsion.html
MTW has a discussion on p. 250 where they say that torsion would violate the e.p. E.g., if the UW Eot-Wash group got a non-null result from their spin-polarized torsion pendulum, it would clearly be a violation of the e.p., since it would be a composition-dependent motion in a gravitational field.

So are there some types of torsion that are empirically testable, violate the e.p., and are inconsistent with GR, while other types of torsion are just a different way of describing the same physics of GR?

As far as my understanding go, in teleparallel gravity, torsion is used as a mathematical formulation of gravity, but in more well known Einstein-Cartan where the metric has both curvature and torsion, torsion is used to model the effect of spin as you mentioned (with curvature still plays it traditional role). So it seems to me that it is the same mathematics used in different models to describe different physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Someone else posted that link, in fact. I've just skimmed it and it looks excellent.

From the abstract of 'Aspects of Gauge Gravity' (arXiv:gr-qc/9602013 v1)

The Einsteinian teleparallelism theory which emerges is shown to be equivalent, for spinless matter and for electromagnetism, to general relativity.

So, for spinning matter it appears that GR and TP gravity don't make the same predictions (?).
 
  • #4
Mentz114 said:
Someone else posted that link, in fact. I've just skimmed it and it looks excellent.

From the abstract of 'Aspects of Gauge Gravity' (arXiv:gr-qc/9602013 v1)



So, for spinning matter it appears that GR and TP gravity don't make the same predictions (?).

I am also quite confused. From http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0612/0612062v1.pdf, it says, without much details,

"It has been alleged that TEGR has serious source coupling limitations, e.g. it has been said that only scalar matter fields or gauge fields are allowed as sources, whereas matter carrying spin cannot be consistently coupled; some argue that torsion does not couple to electromagnetism, others have a different opinion. For the special case of GR and TEGR we can use an argument similar to that used long ago to establish the effective equivalence of GR and the Einstein-Cartan (EC) theory. As in that case, we find that the TEGR effective equivalent field equations and action also do not require an extra field. Nevertheless we get a complete equivalence for all sources, including,
in particular, spinors."

I really like to understand TEGR and teleparallel gravity in general (there are other teleparallel gravity which are not equivalent to GR, they all have flat geometry but nonzero torsion. An early attempt of modify gravity, if you wish...)

As you might know recently the works in f(T) theory is somewhat popular [see e.g. http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3039" [Broken]]. They do what f(R) people do, but instead of promoting Ricci scalar to function of Ricci scalar, they promote so-called torsion scalar of TEGR to f(T). So the idea of torsion gravity is still pretty much around and active.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is teleparallel gravity?

Teleparallel gravity is a theory that proposes an alternative to Einstein's theory of general relativity. It is based on the concept of "teleparallelism" which describes the geometry of spacetime using a different set of mathematical tools than those used in general relativity.

2. What is torsion in teleparallel gravity?

In teleparallel gravity, torsion is a measure of the twisting or rotation of spacetime. It is a fundamental quantity that describes the geometry of spacetime and plays a crucial role in the theory.

3. How is the testability of torsion in teleparallel gravity determined?

The testability of torsion in teleparallel gravity is determined by comparing the predictions of the theory to observations and experiments. This includes testing the effects of torsion on the motion of particles and the behavior of light, as well as comparing its predictions to those of other theories.

4. What are some proposed experimental tests of the torsion in teleparallel gravity?

Some proposed experimental tests of torsion in teleparallel gravity include measuring the deflection of light, the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, and the gravitational redshift. These tests can help determine if the predictions of teleparallel gravity with torsion match those of general relativity.

5. What are the implications of a successful test of torsion in teleparallel gravity?

If torsion in teleparallel gravity is successfully tested, it could have significant implications for our understanding of gravity and the universe. It could provide a new framework for describing the behavior of matter and energy on a large scale and potentially lead to new insights into the nature of dark matter and dark energy.

Back
Top