- #1
Perspicacious
- 76
- 0
The last paragraph of http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0006/0006039.pdf [Broken] states this conclusion:
http://physics.ucr.edu/Active/Abs/abstract-13-NOV-97.html [Broken]
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=79
http://cornell.mirror.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v8/i6/p1662_1 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0101/0101014.pdf [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0503/0503070.pdf [Broken]
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=605
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/simultaneity.htm
I'm delighted that common sense is finally being recognized in the physics community. When do you think it will be realized that an absolute time order precludes the possibility of anything falling into a black hole?
See these references also:Thus in Friedmann–Lemaıtre universes, (i) the expansion of the universe and (ii) the existence of a non–trivial topology for the constant time hypersurfaces both break the Poincare invariance and single out the same “privileged” inertial observer who will age more quickly than any other twin: the one comoving with the cosmic fluid – although aging more quickly than all her traveling sisters may be not a real privilege!
http://physics.ucr.edu/Active/Abs/abstract-13-NOV-97.html [Broken]
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=79
http://cornell.mirror.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v8/i6/p1662_1 [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0101/0101014.pdf [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0503/0503070.pdf [Broken]
http://www.everythingimportant.org/viewtopic.php?t=605
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/simultaneity.htm
I'm delighted that common sense is finally being recognized in the physics community. When do you think it will be realized that an absolute time order precludes the possibility of anything falling into a black hole?
Last edited by a moderator: