Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The Box: in, or out are you?

  1. Jul 1, 2005 #1
    Before I finally get banned from these forums...

    Who here feels like they think "inside the box"?

    Who here feels like they think "outside the box"?

    The reason I ask is because of this thread. There are a lot of people whom I ask different hypothetical or imaginative questions to see what they are thinking, but in most of these, it seems like people are so focused on one single thing that they are unable to see anything else.

    I think ITB would be logic(al), and OTB would be the illogic(al)? With this in mind, I was wondering about buying Christmas presents - if someone is an ITB thinker, you'll get a sweater. If someone is an OTB thinker, you'll get a tie with blinking lights on it.

    Comments? :smile:
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 1, 2005 #2
    What's this about?

    I am definitely an "in the box" type thinker.
    I am definitely an "out of the box" type thinker.
    I don't think so at all. "In the box" means, "according to standard procedure." "Out of the box" refers to novel, original, non-standard methods of thinking. Both could be either logical or illogical.
  4. Jul 1, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Happy belated birthday Arctic fox!
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2005
  5. Jul 1, 2005 #4
    Thank you Lisa! ! ;)
  6. Jul 1, 2005 #5
    If you want I'm sure I could convince people to throw you a "Arctic's getting banned" party. :biggrin:
  7. Jul 1, 2005 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Stop whinging!

    That thread didn't even get closed for Pete's sake. Someone (who happened to be an admin) just said they thought it was a waste of time. What's the problem?

    I don't see it had anything to do with out-of-the-box thinking.
  8. Jul 1, 2005 #7


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    You wont get banned because of that, anyway these people have an obligation to stay in the box, it is innovators who think out of the box.
    If i am half and half can i have both?
  9. Jul 1, 2005 #8
    The thing with thinking outside the box is that you have to know where the box is first. Then you can move outside of it's borders and get creative.

    If you don't know the definition of your box then you are just thinking outside.

    To answer your question, in most things I am an outside the box thinker, but always after I know where the box ends.
  10. Jul 1, 2005 #9
    A box is cubical, it has no end.

  11. Jul 1, 2005 #10
    Does it matter what colour the box is ???
  12. Jul 1, 2005 #11
    It has many ends.
  13. Jul 1, 2005 #12
    But does the ends justify the means? That's what we should be asking ourselves.
  14. Jul 1, 2005 #13
    I would have asked if the color of the box justified the ends.
  15. Jul 1, 2005 #14


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I agree, although, the box is a rather artificial and subjective boundary anyway. To the out-of-the-box thinker, it may seem like they've just come up with a perfectly logical in-the-box solution, while to everyone else stuck in a rut, they view it as outside-the-box.

    Looking at the question posed in the thread referred to by the OP, I don't think it's calling for either. I admit to not seeing the point of the question either. Why post in one of the serious forums here a topic asking how people feel about two choices and specifically instructing them to not think about the physics of it? What I see are a lot of people asking for justification of the question. I'm surprised it hasn't been moved over here to GD already.

    I'd be cautious in making such a statement (I think there's more than one way to read that). I think one way to get trapped thinking inside-the-box is to spend too much time focusing on the box rather than on the question that needs solving. But, on the other hand, if you don't know how others have attempted to solve the problem before you, then you risk just repeating their mistakes again. Being able to look at the attempted solutions that have not worked and identifying where the problems were is a good way to find a new solution.

    I don't know, it seems I come across to others as an outside-the-box thinker, but I myself don't feel like I'm doing that; I'm just following the logical next step. Honestly, I don't really think there is a "box," and it certainly doesn't define logical from illogical, it is simply jargon that means the same thing as the old phrase, "stuck in a rut." It just means you've become so focused on one way of doing things that you have lost the ability to step back and look at the whole picture for a new solution.
  16. Jul 1, 2005 #15
    But few means.

    I run into the same thing. When I ask a question, often the answer is more descriptive than creative, and I get the impression that many people here do not ask themselves anything really off the wall about their areas of expertise.


    The Rev
  17. Jul 1, 2005 #16


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Isn't it the ubiquitous "Black Box".
  18. Jul 1, 2005 #17
    Out of the box thinking isn't necessarily radical. Nor does it require focusing on the "box."

    I am a mechanical engineering designer and one day I overheard my coworkers talking about a project. It was a simple job to stop toilets at a reststop from sweating condensation onto the floor. The "in the box" suggestions to solve this were, heat the cold well water above the dew point of the room (could be in the 80's or higher), insulate the toilets, or air condition the 100% outside air unit air. I knew the inside of the box methods of handling this problem already, I knew the drawbacks associated with these solutions. They were costly, wasteful, unsanitary and may not solve the problem.

    Without going into detail, all I did was combine two "in the box" methods in one "out of the box" approach resulting in colder lower dewpoint air, warmer water delivered to the toilets, and enourmous energy savings over conventional systems.
  19. Jul 1, 2005 #18


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Still can't spell "enormous" though, can you, cleverclogs?

  20. Jul 1, 2005 #19
    Yeah, or remember to hit the stupid spellcheck. :yuck:

    As people with sinus problems are always saying to me, I spell awful. :biggrin:
  21. Jul 1, 2005 #20


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Heh heh heh!

    My sinus problems usually lead me to tell them that "noses run in my family".
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook