Understanding Waves: Is There Hope?

In summary, sound waves and water waves can be seen in the world through various means. The general definition of a wave in physics is any phenomenon that behaves according to the wave equation. The wave equation may seem complicated, but it is necessary to understand the underlying principles of waves. However, there are simpler ways to understand specific kinds of waves, such as sound waves and water waves, without a lot of equations.
  • #1
Misr
385
0
Hello World,
These days, I'm trying to introduce the concept of waves into my stupid mind but It seems to be Hopeless..Whatever..
What are waves really?Can we see waves by any means in the world ?or they just do disturbance to the medium particles?

Is there a real hope to understand waves?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Have you ever dropped a pebble into a pond? Those ringey things on the surface traveling away from where the pebble went in are waves.
 
  • #3
Misr said:
Hello World,
These days, I'm trying to introduce the concept of waves into my stupid mind but It seems to be Hopeless..Whatever..
What are waves really?Can we see waves by any means in the world ?or they just do disturbance to the medium particles?

Is there a real hope to understand waves?

Thanks

The wave-like properties of light and other elementary particles can be observed through the double-slit experiment. Youtube search double-slit experiment. Unfortunately, Physicists even today cannot agree as to whether photons and other quantum particles create the wave, ride a preexisting wave, or simply just follow a wave-like path since that is the nature of all movement. Physics today is a mess of conflicting theories and paradoxes, and it all comes back to wave-particle duality. Once you get into physics and you hear things like "quantum weirdness"--you know they're hopelessly lost, if they're just saying "man that's weird" out loud.
 
  • #4
Have you ever dropped a pebble into a pond? Those ringey things on the surface traveling away from where the pebble went in are waves.
so we can see waves according to you?

The wave-like properties of light and other elementary particles can be observed through the double-slit experiment. Youtube search double-slit experiment. Unfortunately, Physicists even today cannot agree as to whether photons and other quantum particles create the wave, ride a preexisting wave, or simply just follow a wave-like path since that is the nature of all movement. Physics today is a mess of conflicting theories and paradoxes, and it all comes back to wave-particle duality. Once you get into physics and you hear things like "quantum weirdness"--you know they're hopelessly lost, if they're just saying "man that's weird" out loud.
my question is quite simple and I think i can't get the answer that satisfies my eagerness

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/images/waves-wavelength.gif
What does this represent?Don't tell me a wave..Does this represent the vibrations of particles of the medium? If so then what is a wave?Can this wave be seen?? Answer me
 
  • #6
Misr said:
my question is quite simple
In one clear and unambiguous sentence, what is your simple question?
 
  • #7
In one clear and unambiguous sentence, what is your simple question?
Well,sorry,It's not one question..it's a combination of many questions , i can't introduce the concept of a wave into my mind and I'm suffering a lot ..
First of all :Can we see waves by any means in the world ?or they just do disturbance to the medium particles?
http://www.school-for-champions.com/...wavelength.gif
What does this represent?Don't tell me a wave..Does this represent the vibrations of particles of the medium? If so then what is a wave?Can this wave be seen??

Thanks in advance
 
  • #8
Misr said:
Well,sorry,It's not one question..it's a combination of many questions
Then it is a little unfair for you to respond to Renaatier as you did.

Misr said:
, i can't introduce the concept of a wave into my mind and I'm suffering a lot ..
First of all :Can we see waves by any means in the world ?or they just do disturbance to the medium particles?
http://www.school-for-champions.com/...wavelength.gif
What does this represent?Don't tell me a wave..Does this represent the vibrations of particles of the medium? If so then what is a wave?Can this wave be seen??
In physics, a good definition of a wave is any phenomenon which behaves according to the wave equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation

There are many different systems that behave according to the wave equation, so yes, we see waves by many means in the world. Some waves are disturbances to some medium of particles, but others are disturbances to fields. It doesn't really matter what the function (u in the Wikipedia article) represents, only how it behaves.
 
  • #9
hmmm so we see water waves?these circles are called water waves then?
 
  • #10
In physics, a good definition of a wave is any phenomenon which behaves according to the wave equation:
but the wave equation is very complicated for me and we don't study these things at school>>are there any simpler ways?
 
  • #11
It depends on the type of wave. In water, the shape of the wave shows where the water is physically higher. That's the one you're used to.

With light, it represents the strength of the electric field at that point. In quantum mechanics, it represents where something is likely to be found. Waves can mean many things depending on the context!
 
  • #12
Misr said:
but the wave equation is very complicated for me and we don't study these things at school>>are there any simpler ways?
There are certainly simpler ways to understand specific kinds of waves, but to understand the general underlying phenomenon I think requires the math. Is there a specific kind of wave that you are interested in for simplicity's sake? If so, then we can probably discuss that specific kind of wave without a lot of equations.
 
  • #13
There are certainly simpler ways to understand specific kinds of waves, but to understand the general underlying phenomenon I think requires the math. Is there a specific kind of wave that you are interested in for simplicity's sake? If so, then we can probably discuss that specific kind of wave without a lot of equations.
ok,let's talk about water waves and sound waves
 
  • #14
Let's start with sound waves. In a sound wave we are looking at small spatial and temporal deviations in the air pressure and velocity from the "bulk" pressure and velocity.

If you consider a small chunk of air then if the pressure on the left is greater than the pressure on the right there will be a net force on the chunk which will cause it to accelerate to the right. In doing so it will get closer to the neighboring chunk on the right and further away from the neighboring chunk on the left. This will cause the pressure on the right to increase and the pressure on the left to decrease, bringing both back to equilibrium.

However, by the time that the pressure equalizes the chunk of air will have gained some velocity to the right, and due to its natural inertia will continue move in that direction. This will cause the pressure on the right to continue to increase and the pressure on the left to continue to decrease, beyond the equilibrium value.

As this continues the chunk of air exeperiences a net force to the left, which works to decelerate the chunk of air. As the difference in pressure to the left and right increases, the deceleration increases, until finally the chunk of air is brought to a stop.

At this point the chunk of air is stationary with the pressure on the right being greater than the pressure on the left. The situation then repeats in reverse, each oscillation going through this cycle.
 
  • #15
Yes,this seems clear..I'm starting to draw a clear picture right now.and a tuning fork is a good example of this (it affects the pressure) right?
Thanks very much for this clear explanation and now I can ask some more clear and definite questions:
1-Why do sound travel through solids faster than liquids faster than gases??I think it has somethin to do with the intermolecular forces.

2-why do longtudinal waves travel in gases only?I think it has somethin to do with the intermolecular forces too.
3-the waves of the surface of a cup of water are transeverse while in depth,there exist longitudinal; waves..so why?

4-on tossing a stone in a pond..why do we consider the postition of the stone as the first crest??what is the wave length then?where are crests and troughs in this case..
I can't deal with these kinds of problems..It would be great if you use some illustrations

Thanks very much..
 
  • #16
DaleSpam said:
In physics, a good definition of a wave is any phenomenon which behaves according to the wave equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation
As Whitham (1974) pointed out, many (if not most) waves are not governed by the "wave equation"!

(He gives a much broader definition, that a wave is "a recognizable signal that is transferred from one part of a medium to another with a recognizable velocity of propagation.")
 
  • #17
What are waves really?Can we see waves by any means in the world ?or they just do disturbance to the medium particles?

Try reading some here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waves

and look at the illustrations and explanations under each.

You can also look up TRANSVERSE WAVE AND LONGITUDIONAL WAVE if interested.


Waves in general carry energy ( a disturbance) from one place to another. It turns out some waves required a medium, like water waves, and others don't, like light (an electromagnetic wave). Sometimes you can see them (by eye) sometimes not. For example you can see light (waves) from the sun but not higher frequency waves from an X-ray machine.
 
  • #18
Misr said:
1-Why do sound travel through solids faster than liquids faster than gases??I think it has somethin to do with the intermolecular forces.
Yes, the intermolecular forces are given by Young's modulus (stiffness), the stiffer the material the faster the speed of sound. The other thing that affects the speed of sound in a material is the density of the material, the lighter the material the faster the speed of sound.

Misr said:
2-why do longtudinal waves travel in gases only?I think it has somethin to do with the intermolecular forces too.
Longitudinal waves travel in liquids and solids also. Since a fluid deforms under shear stress it is very hard to get transverse waves in a fluid.

Misr said:
3-the waves of the surface of a cup of water are transeverse while in depth,there exist longitudinal; waves..so why?
I don't think this is correct. Do you have a reference?

Misr said:
4-on tossing a stone in a pond..why do we consider the postition of the stone as the first crest??what is the wave length then?where are crests and troughs in this case..
The definition of wavelength is unchanged, the crests are the tops of the ripples and the troughs are the bottoms of the ripples. I suspect I am not understanding what you are actually asking.
 
  • #19
I don't think this is correct. Do you have a reference?
our textbook of physics :(
 
  • #20
Re electromagnetic waves. They have length and amplitude but do they have width or what would they look like end on? Waves on water are obviously 3d because the medium they propagate through is 3d. How can a massless wave be 3d.
 
  • #21
The wave equation for EM involves 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time, so I would say it is 4D. I don't know what mass has to do with it.
 
  • #22
DaleSpam said:
The wave equation for EM involves 3 dimensions of space and 1 dimension of time, so I would say it is 4D. I don't know what mass has to do with it.

is position in those 3D's definitive? Or a probability of where it is?
 
  • #23
Depends if you are doing classical EM (Maxwell's equations) or quantum EM (QED).
 
  • #24
DaleSpam said:
Depends if you are doing classical EM (Maxwell's equations) or quantum EM (QED).

I'll go with QED, since it's newer and puts a magnifying glass on what Maxwell's equations are looking at.
 
  • #26
DaleSpam said:
Then it's a probability.

So in QED a photon has a probable 4D position?
 
  • #27
Essentially, yes. But I am not a QED expert.
 
  • #28
olivermsun said:
As Whitham (1974) pointed out, many (if not most) waves are not governed by the "wave equation"!

(He gives a much broader definition, that a wave is "a recognizable signal that is transferred from one part of a medium to another with a recognizable velocity of propagation.")

Sounds interesting and quite surprising to me. Can you give one example please? And if we have "found" an equation that explain the wave, better.
Thanks.
 
  • #29
fluidistic said:
Sounds interesting and quite surprising to me. Can you give one example please? And if we have "found" an equation that explain the wave, better.
Thanks.
Perhaps the most ubiquitous example would be surface water waves, which are governed by Laplace's equation,
[tex]\nabla^2\varphi = 0[/tex]
where velocity is the gradient of the potential
[tex]\mathbf{u} = \nabla\varphi.[/tex]
 
  • #30
The resulting surface elevation is a solution to the wave equation. The fluid's velocity is not described by the wave equation, but the height of the ripples is. When people talk of water waves they are speaking about the ripples, not the velocity of the water molecules.

I don't think this is an example supporting your claim.
 
  • #31
DaleSpam said:
The resulting surface elevation is a solution to the wave equation. The fluid's velocity is not described by the wave equation, but the height of the ripples is. When people talk of water waves they are speaking about the ripples, not the velocity of the water molecules.
The motions of ripples in water are determined by the motions of the water, just as the motions of waves moving along a string are determined by the motions of the string itself.

The moving ripples in (deep) water are dispersive; solutions to the classical wave equation are not.
 
  • #32
olivermsun said:
The motions of ripples in water are determined by the motions of the water
Certainly. But "determined by" is not "the same as".

olivermsun said:
The moving ripples in (deep) water are dispersive; solutions to the classical wave equation are not.
This is true. Dispersive waves are only approximately modeled by the classical wave equation. The approximation is bad for long times, but for short times it is reasonable. So I would still keep the definition and just indicate that dispersive waves are not ideal waves.
 
  • #33
DaleSpam said:
Dispersive waves are only approximately modeled by the classical wave equation. The approximation is bad for long times, but for short times it is reasonable. So I would still keep the definition and just indicate that dispersive waves are not ideal waves.
The behavior of dispersive water waves is fundamentally different from the hyperbolic waves that arise from the wave equation. You can see this easily and within a short time (relative to the wave period) from the way ripples crawl across the top of a wave 'bump' due to the difference between phase and group speeds.

I admit I do not really understand why one would want to define an entire class of interesting (and very well-studied) waves out of the discussion just because they don't fit an a "wave" equation which happens to arise from the physics of certain other kinds of ideal waves.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
olivermsun said:
Perhaps the most ubiquitous example would be surface water waves, which are governed by Laplace's equation,
[tex]\nabla^2\varphi = 0[/tex]
where velocity is the gradient of the potential
[tex]\mathbf{u} = \nabla\varphi.[/tex]

Hope this doesn't make this thread too concrete, but I had to ask: the homogenous wave equation reduces to Laplace's equation if the perturbation on the surface of water doesn't depend explicitly on time yes? Also, your second statement (u being conservative), is this only valid for irrotational flows? Could surface water waves still be governed by Laplace's equation even if the velocity field was non-conservative? (I'm thinking of the sea sloshing around).

As for the OP: first start by looking at individual pulses. Think of tying a rope to a stake in the ground and giving it a jolt. You can think of a progressive wave as a sequence of jolts that move from point A to B. Ie: shock wave from a loud event, ripples on a pond etc. In these cases, the "jolt" is a rapid compression-decompression of air, or an elevation in water height, respectively, instead of a mountain formed on a rope by yanking it.

Consider fixing tying both ends of the rope or string to two stakes, then strumming the rope/string. This is essentially a musical instrument string. The waves are formed by two identical progressive waves that propagate in opposite directions along the string. Their sum produces what is called a standing or harmonic wave, which as its name implies doesn't go anywhere, as you've bounded both ends of the string.

You can extend this idea of standing waves to to 2-D by looking at how a drumskin vibrates, since its also "bounded" or " its ends are also fixed", so to speak.

I hope my wording is helpful.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
olivermsun said:
I admit I do not really understand why one would want to define an entire class of interesting (and very well-studied) waves out of the discussion just because they don't fit an a "wave" equation which happens to arise from the physics of certain other kinds of ideal waves.
Mostly because I don't like any of the alternative definitions that I have seen. Like this one:
olivermsun said:
"a recognizable signal that is transferred from one part of a medium to another with a recognizable velocity of propagation."
IMO that is a poor scientific definition. What makes a signal and a propagation velocity "recognizable"? Does empty space count as a medium? Etc. If you pursue those rigorously you probably wind up with a wave equation anyway.

Just because something is approximately a wave doesn't mean that you cannot study or talk about it.
 
Last edited:
<h2>1. What are waves and how do they work?</h2><p>Waves are disturbances that travel through a medium, such as air or water. They are created when a source of energy, such as wind or vibrations, causes a disturbance in the medium. This disturbance then travels through the medium, carrying energy with it.</p><h2>2. What is the difference between transverse and longitudinal waves?</h2><p>Transverse waves move perpendicular to the direction of the disturbance, while longitudinal waves move parallel to the direction of the disturbance. A common example of a transverse wave is a water wave, while a sound wave is an example of a longitudinal wave.</p><h2>3. How do waves transfer energy?</h2><p>Waves transfer energy through the movement of particles in the medium. As the wave travels, the particles in the medium vibrate back and forth, transferring energy from one particle to the next.</p><h2>4. What affects the speed of a wave?</h2><p>The speed of a wave is affected by the properties of the medium it travels through, such as density and elasticity. In general, waves travel faster through denser and more elastic mediums.</p><h2>5. Is there hope for understanding waves completely?</h2><p>While there is still much to learn about waves, scientists have made significant progress in understanding their properties and behaviors. With continued research and advancements in technology, there is hope for a deeper understanding of waves in the future.</p>

1. What are waves and how do they work?

Waves are disturbances that travel through a medium, such as air or water. They are created when a source of energy, such as wind or vibrations, causes a disturbance in the medium. This disturbance then travels through the medium, carrying energy with it.

2. What is the difference between transverse and longitudinal waves?

Transverse waves move perpendicular to the direction of the disturbance, while longitudinal waves move parallel to the direction of the disturbance. A common example of a transverse wave is a water wave, while a sound wave is an example of a longitudinal wave.

3. How do waves transfer energy?

Waves transfer energy through the movement of particles in the medium. As the wave travels, the particles in the medium vibrate back and forth, transferring energy from one particle to the next.

4. What affects the speed of a wave?

The speed of a wave is affected by the properties of the medium it travels through, such as density and elasticity. In general, waves travel faster through denser and more elastic mediums.

5. Is there hope for understanding waves completely?

While there is still much to learn about waves, scientists have made significant progress in understanding their properties and behaviors. With continued research and advancements in technology, there is hope for a deeper understanding of waves in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
43
Views
670
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
903
Replies
78
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top