Confusion about The Conjugate Roots Theorem

In summary: So the first statement is neutral about what happens when you use complex numbers as input values. It does not say that non-real numbers cannot come up. It just does not say anything about what happens when you use them as input values.The second bolded statement is a theorem about what happens when you use complex numbers as input values. It says that if you use a complex number as an input value, then its conjugate (which is also a complex number) will also be an input value. So, if you use complex numbers as input values, then the outputs will also be complex numbers since the input values are complex numbers. This is in line with the first statement because the first statement is neutral about what happens with
  • #1
opus
Gold Member
717
131
As a preface to this theorem stated in my text, it states that:
"If all the coefficients of a polynomial ##P(x)## are real, then ##P## is a function that transforms real numbers into other real numbers, and consequently, ##P## can be graphed in the Cartesian Coordinate Plane."

It then goes on to state The Conjugate Roots Theorem:
Let ##P(x)## be a polynomial with only real coefficients. If the complex number ##a+bi## is a zero of ##P##, then so is the complex number ##a-bi##. In terms of linear factors of ##P##, this means that if ##x-(a+bi)## is a factor of ##P##, then so is ##x-(a-bi)##.

Now I understand the theorem, but what I've highlighted in bold is confusing me as it seems to be a contradiction. In the first statement, what I understand is that if we have real coefficients in a polynomial, then we'll have real numbers (and have no non-reals come up). In the theorem, it states the same given of only real coefficients, but now states that we can have non-real numbers come up. We then would not be able to graph all the solutions in the Cartesian Coordinate Plane.

Where am I thinking incorrectly here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is no contradiction here. The point is that ##(x-a-ib)(x-a+ib) = x^2 - 2ax +a^2 + b^2## so even if it is factorised it into linear factors using complex numbers, the final result will be real if ##x## is real.

Edit: Let me add that, while you can graph the polynomial, only the real roots will be zeros of the graph. For example, ##y = x^2 + 1## has no real roots so its graph never crosses the ##x##-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes opus
  • #3
Orodruin said:
There is no contradiction here. The point is that ##(x-a-ib)(x-a+ib) = x^2 - 2ax +a^2 + b^2## so even if it is factorised it into linear factors using complex numbers, the final result will be real if ##x## is real.

Edit: Let me add that, while you can graph the polynomial, only the real roots will be zeros of the graph. For example, ##y = x^2 + 1## has no real roots so its graph never crosses the ##x##-axis.

What do you mean by this? How can ##(x-a-ib)## or ##(x-a+ib)## be real if they have non-real constants? I understand up to the point where you factored the polynomial into linear factors which in this case have non-real constants in them.
I do understand that we can have polynomials of degree ##n## that will have at most ##n## solutions that may be real or non-real and distinct or non-distinct. If they are non-real solutions, they will not cross the x-axis and cannot be graphed in the Cartesian Plane.
 
  • #4
opus said:
How can (x−a−ib)(x−a−ib)(x-a-ib) or (x−a+ib)(x−a+ib)(x-a+ib) be real if they have non-real constants?
I never said they were. I said their product is real. This follows directly from ##z\bar z## and ##z+\bar z## being real for any complex number ##z##.
 
  • Like
Likes opus
  • #5
opus said:
If they are non-real solutions, they will not cross the x-axis and cannot be graphed in the Cartesian Plane
What do you mean by this? Do you intend to say that the zeros will not be on the real line (true) or that you cannot graph the polynomial (false)?
 
  • Like
Likes opus
  • #6
Take ##P(x)=x^2+1=(x+i)(x-i)##. It has real coefficients ##1\cdot x^2 + 1##, its graph can be drawn, it doesn't cross the real line, and it has two complex and conjugate zeroes ##\pm \, i\,.##

So what don't you understand in this example?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes opus
  • #7
opus said:
As a preface to this theorem stated in my text, it states that:
"If all the coefficients of a polynomial ##P(x)## are real, then ##P## is a function that transforms real numbers into other real numbers, and consequently, ##P## can be graphed in the Cartesian Coordinate Plane."

It then goes on to state The Conjugate Roots Theorem:
Let ##P(x)## be a polynomial with only real coefficients. If the complex number ##a+bi## is a zero of ##P##, then so is the complex number ##a-bi##. In terms of linear factors of ##P##, this means that if ##x-(a+bi)## is a factor of ##P##, then so is ##x-(a-bi)##.

Now I understand the theorem, but what I've highlighted in bold is confusing me as it seems to be a contradiction. In the first statement, what I understand is that if we have real coefficients in a polynomial, then we'll have real numbers (and have no non-reals come up). In the theorem, it states the same given of only real coefficients, but now states that we can have non-real numbers come up. We then would not be able to graph all the solutions in the Cartesian Coordinate Plane.

Where am I thinking incorrectly here?

The first bolded statement means that if you use a real number as an input value, then the output value will also be a real number. It is not a prescription that bars complex numbers from being used as input values. It simply has nothing to say about what happens if you use complex numbers that are not real numbers as input values.

The second bolded statement and the associated theorem tells us what will happen if the same polynomial has a complex root (a complex input that is associated with an output of 0). Neither statement contradicts the other.
 
  • Like
Likes opus
  • #8
Orodruin said:
I never said they were. I said their product is real. This follows directly from ##z\bar z## and ##z+\bar z## being real for any complex number ##z##.

Ohh ok. The product is real. Understood.

Orodruin said:
What do you mean by this? Do you intend to say that the zeros will not be on the real line (true) or that you cannot graph the polynomial (false)?
The first one. So to my understanding, only real zeros can be represented in the Cartersian Plane as it is two intersecting number lines consisting of real numbers.

fresh_42 said:
Take ##P(x)=x^2+1=(x+i)(x-i)##. It has real coefficients ##1\cdot x^2 + 1##, its graph can be drawn, it doesn't cross the real line, and it has two complex and conjugate zeroes ##\pm \, i\,.##

So what don't you understand in this example?

I fully understand that example. I think I must have misunderstood the difference between ##P(x)## having real coefficients and the constants of the factors being non-real. In the given text, I was focusing on the statement that "If all coefficients of a polynomial are real, then ##P## is a function that transforms real numbers into real numbers", and thinking that this meant that if ##P(x)## has all real coefficients, then we can't get non-real numbers.

slider142 said:
The first bolded statement means that if you use a real number as an input value, then the output value will also be a real number. It is not a prescription that bars complex numbers from being used as input values. It simply has nothing to say about what happens if you use complex numbers that are not real numbers as input values.

The second bolded statement and the associated theorem tells us what will happen if the same polynomial has a complex root (a complex input that is associated with an output of 0). Neither statement contradicts the other.

Yes this is exactly what was confusing me. I didn't really know how to word it correctly I guess. Sorry for the confusion guys and thanks so much for the replies.
 
  • #9
You don't even need to use complex numbers. E.g. ##x^2-2## has rational coefficients, even integers, but no rational roots. Here we can draw a graph which crosses the ##x-##axis twice, just at locations which aren't rational. This entire matter is subject to field theory. In this example you can add - terminus technicus is adjoint - the square root of ##2## and all its sums and rational multiples to the rationals and obtain ##\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]## which has the zeros required. But then you won't have zeros for ## x^2-3##. Latest in the field of complex numbers are all roots (= zeroes) of all polynomials included. However, this doesn't mean we can write them down as expression of roots, only that they exist in there and can be numerically approximated.
 

1. What is the Conjugate Roots Theorem?

The Conjugate Roots Theorem, also known as the Conjugate Pairs Theorem, states that if a polynomial equation has complex coefficients, then its roots occur in conjugate pairs. This means that if a + bi is a root of the equation, then a - bi is also a root.

2. How is the Conjugate Roots Theorem used in mathematics?

The Conjugate Roots Theorem is used in various areas of mathematics, including algebra, calculus, and complex analysis. It is especially useful in finding the roots of polynomial equations with complex coefficients and in proving the fundamental theorem of algebra.

3. Can the Conjugate Roots Theorem be applied to all polynomial equations?

Yes, the Conjugate Roots Theorem can be applied to all polynomial equations with complex coefficients. It is not applicable to equations with real coefficients as they do not have complex roots.

4. What is the importance of the Conjugate Roots Theorem in engineering and science?

The Conjugate Roots Theorem is essential in engineering and science as it helps in solving problems involving complex numbers, such as in electrical engineering, signal processing, and fluid dynamics. It also plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing the behavior of systems with complex variables.

5. Are there any real-world applications of the Conjugate Roots Theorem?

Yes, the Conjugate Roots Theorem has several real-world applications, including in designing electrical circuits, modeling vibrations in mechanical systems, and analyzing the behavior of light waves. It is also used in modeling and predicting the growth and decay of various populations in biology and economics.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Back
Top