Correction : I disengaged .@Jim: I still haven't quite understood your line of reasoning when you made your claims, and was hoping to get it before you conceded. I am sorry you did that, but I cannot go any other way as I have no where to go?
What i've claimed is:
(1) The facts are not all out.
(2) At this stage any reasonable person (IMHO) would accept an official police report as pretty factual statement of what was observed and not suggest the officer lied about it..
And what the officer observed was:
post 43One guy bleeding from nose and head, grass stains on back of his shirt.
Other guy shot dead.
What other claims were you referring to ?