The difference between classical and quantum correlations

In summary, classical and quantum correlations differ in the way information is transmitted between systems. Classical correlations use direct transmission while quantum correlations use entanglement. This affects communication and computation, as classical correlations are limited while quantum correlations have the potential to enhance abilities. These two types of correlations can coexist in a system, with classical correlations often used to measure and verify quantum correlations. They are measured and quantified using classical and quantum information theory, respectively. Understanding these correlations has practical applications in improving technology, data encryption, and advancing research in quantum computing.
  • #1
sciencejournalist00
94
2
I believe it is an important topic for us to learn about. There are frequent mistakes, people confuse many times classical correlations with quantum entanglement on their blogs and forums and only peer-reviewed papers give the true answers.

Classical correlations exist between the quanta of a single mode generated with resonance, like in the case of lasers and musical instruments.

They are called Coherent Gaussian Beams, appear when the individual waves of a pulse are in phase (0 degrees phase difference) and are described by different equations from the ones that describe quantum entanglement.

If classical correlations and quantum entanglement were the same, you would just have to use a single laser device to generate billions of entangled photons, without use of beam splitter or nonlinear crystals. But they aren't.

While I know about the difference between quantum and classical correlations, I do not know how to distinguish them in practice.

Can you please give some examples of interactions that create these types of correlations for each case, so that everyone may have in future a template to follow in their experiments?

1. Classical correlations: resonant excitations...
2. Quantum correlations: parametric fluorescence, double decay...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello,

Thank you for bringing up this important topic. it is crucial for us to have a clear understanding of the differences between classical correlations and quantum entanglement. I completely agree with you that only peer-reviewed papers can provide accurate information on this subject.

To answer your question, let me first explain the difference between classical correlations and quantum entanglement. Classical correlations refer to the relationship between two or more systems that can be described by classical physics, such as Newtonian mechanics. These correlations are based on the properties of individual particles and do not involve any quantum effects.

On the other hand, quantum entanglement refers to a phenomenon where two or more particles are intrinsically connected and their behavior is linked, regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon is based on the principles of quantum mechanics and cannot be explained by classical physics.

Now, let's look at some examples of interactions that create these types of correlations:

1. Classical correlations: Resonant excitations in classical systems, such as lasers and musical instruments, can create classical correlations. For example, when two musical instruments are tuned to the same frequency and played simultaneously, the sound waves from each instrument will be in phase and produce a coherent sound.

2. Quantum correlations: There are several ways to create quantum correlations, such as parametric fluorescence and double decay. In parametric fluorescence, a photon from an excited atom is split into two entangled photons. In double decay, a particle decays into two particles that are entangled. These types of correlations cannot be created in classical systems and are unique to quantum systems.

In conclusion, classical correlations and quantum entanglement are fundamentally different phenomena. Classical correlations exist in classical systems, while quantum entanglement is a purely quantum phenomenon. I hope this helps to clarify the distinction between the two and provides a template for future experiments. Thank you for your interest in this topic.
 

1. What is the main difference between classical and quantum correlations?

The main difference between classical and quantum correlations is the way information is transmitted between two systems. In classical correlations, information is transmitted directly and can be predicted with certainty. In quantum correlations, information is transmitted through entanglement, which means the state of one system is dependent on the state of the other and cannot be predicted with certainty.

2. How do classical and quantum correlations affect communication and computation?

Classical correlations are limited in terms of communication and computation because the information can only be transmitted directly. Quantum correlations, on the other hand, have the potential to greatly enhance communication and computation abilities due to the use of entanglement and superposition.

3. Can classical and quantum correlations coexist?

Yes, classical and quantum correlations can coexist in a system. In fact, classical correlations are often present in quantum systems, but they do not interfere with the quantum correlations. This is why scientists often use classical correlations to measure and verify quantum correlations.

4. How are classical and quantum correlations measured and quantified?

Classical correlations can be measured using classical information theory, which involves measuring the amount of information transmitted between two systems. Quantum correlations, on the other hand, are measured using quantum information theory, which takes into account the principles of quantum mechanics such as entanglement and superposition.

5. What are the practical applications of understanding classical and quantum correlations?

Understanding classical and quantum correlations has numerous practical applications, such as improving communication and computation technologies, developing more secure methods of data encryption, and advancing research in quantum information processing and quantum computing.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
146
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
662
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
623
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
811
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
464
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top