The effect of gravity on light

In summary, the effect of gravity on light can be understood by two main effects: light bending and gravitational redshift. These effects are slight, but can be estimated by knowing the object's Schwarzschild radius, which is proportional to its mass. For example, the sun's Schwarzschild radius is 3 km and a galaxy like Andromeda has a Schwarzschild radius of 3 trillion km. Light passing close to these objects will experience a slight bend and redshift. The exact formula for gravitational redshift is 1+ zgrav = 1/sqrt(1 - Rs/R). For a more exotic object like a black hole or quasar, the gravitational redshift can be significant, but is still considered a minor
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
we just had a couple of threads start about the effect of gravity on light----Jakrabb started "hubble and doppler" in this forum and in the Theoretical forum JSK333 started "light, black holes and gravity"

The two main effects to understand (two that are easy to estimate with very little arithmetic) are light bending and gravitational redshift. In common circumstances they are slight effects----e.g. the sun does not bend passing light rays very much, nor is the light coming to us from its surface redshifted very much by the effort of escaping from the sun's gravity----but it's not a bad idea to know HOW slight.

Any massive object has a Schwarzschild radius----proportional to its mass.
The sun's Schwarzschild radius is 3 km----that's the size of an equal mass Schw. black hole. A large galaxy like Andromeda or MilkyWay has a mass of about a trillion solar (E12) so its Schw. radius is 3 trillion kilometers. As far as concerns light-bending and grav redshift, an objects Schw. radius Rs tells it all.

If you know Rs then you can easily tell how much the star or galaxy will bend a passing lightray, and by how much light escaping from the star's surface or from some typical location inside the galaxy will appear depleted of energy or redshifted (it is usually not by much!)

A lightray passing within distance R from the sun's center gets bent by an angle (in radians) of 2Rs/R

Same for a ray of light passing by outside our galaxy at a distance R from the galaxy's center. It gets bent by an angle of 2Rs/R

All you need to do is double the Schw. radius of the thing and divide by the distance of closest approach.

The sun's radius is 700,000 km. So a grazing lightray gets bent by an angle of 6/700,000------very small number like a thousandth of a percent.

The redshift in light leaving the sun's surface is even less. An approximate but useful formula for it is Rs/2R

So you can see that for light from the sun's surface
zgrav = 3/1400,000-----on the order of a millionth.

It's incredibly easy to calculate--just take the sun's Schw. (3 km) radius and divide by twice its real (700,000 km) radius.
This formula is extremely accurate for the small gravitational redshifts associated with ordinary stars and galaxies.
The grav. redshift ordinarily amounts to only a broadening of a spectral line or a small correction to the main types of redshift (cosmological and doppler).

But still let's look at the exact formula and apply it to some more exotic object like a black hole or quasar. The formula for zgrav is still based on that versatile multipurpose parameter the Schwarzschild radius! There is just a square root in the formula so it is a tiny bit more complicated.

1+ zgrav = 1/sqrt(1 - Rs/R)

1 + z is the ratio by which wavelengths are lengthened in light escaping to infinity from an initial distance R from center.

So right off you can see that light trying to escape from the event horizon itself (R = Rs) is infinitely redshifted. It dies. All its energy is canceled. This is the basic meaning of the Schw. radius:

1/sqrt(1 - 1) equals infinity---the redshift is infinite for light trying to escape. Some people may pick nits with the figurative way of talking--light doesn't really "try", it's not a person, etc etc. I am more concerned with the simple formulas than with verbal niceness.

For a less extreme case, imagine stuff spiraling into a black hole as in a quasar: the accretion disk is heated essentially by compression and collisions as it is drawn into the hole, so it radiates. If temperatures as high as several million kelvin are reached then it can radiate x-rays.

This radiation will be gravitationally redshifted as viewed by a distant observer. If e.g. it is emitted at a distance of 100 Rs
then its Rs/R is equal to 0.01

and 1 - Rs/R = 0.99

and 1 + z = 1/sqrt(0.99) = 1/0.995 = 1.005

So the gravitational redshift for that particular quasar light is five thousandths----0.005 or half a percent.

Even light emitted from as close as 10 Rs to center
has Rs/R equal to 0.1

and 1 - Rs/R = 0.9

and 1 + z = 1/sqrt(0.9) = 1/0.95 = 1.054

so zgrav is only a little over 5 percent.

The overall redshift observed for quasars is much larger than that---it's commonly of order unity----numbers like 2, 3, 4 are common and one has been observed with z as high as 6.4. Evidently these observed redshifts are mostly cosmological in origin and are so treated by astronomers when they are discussed.
In such contexts the gravitational component of the redshift is best seen as a minor correction. But still one that is good to know about.

BTW the formula for Schw. radius has come up in several other threads and is 2GM/c2-----that's where the figure of 3 kilometers for the sun comes from.

Or 3 trillion km for a trillion-solar-mass galaxy.

I see I didnt yet do the grav redshift for a star like the sun which is about 3E17 km out from the center of a roughly trillion solar mass. The galaxy's Schw. radius is 3E12 km. So dividing 3E12 by twice 3E17 gives 0.5E-5. This is 5 ppm. Just to take a representative run-of-the-mill case,
the sun's light, seen by an observer well outside MilkyWay has a negligible grav redshift of around five parts per million.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I've posted this question on other threads.

There's probably a simple answer:

I assume that there was some kind of expansion before Planck Time.

Did the Strong, Weak and Electromagnetic Forces exist before Planck Time? I assume they didn't.

But what about Gravity, given that it is a product of "expansion?"

Thanks, Rudi

Thought is easy. Life is hard.
 

What is the effect of gravity on light?

The effect of gravity on light is known as gravitational lensing. This phenomenon occurs when the path of light is bent due to the presence of a massive object, such as a star or a black hole.

How does gravity affect the speed of light?

Gravity does not directly affect the speed of light, which is a constant in a vacuum. However, it can indirectly affect the speed of light by bending the path of light, making it appear to travel a longer distance and therefore taking longer to reach its destination.

Why is the study of gravity's effect on light important?

Studying the effect of gravity on light is important because it allows us to understand the behavior of light and its interactions with massive objects in the universe. This can provide valuable insights into the nature of gravity and help us better understand the structure and evolution of the universe.

Can gravity bend all forms of light?

Yes, gravity can bend all forms of light, including visible light, radio waves, and X-rays. This is because all forms of light are electromagnetic radiation and are affected by the curvature of space caused by massive objects.

How has the study of gravity's effect on light contributed to our understanding of the universe?

The study of gravity's effect on light has contributed significantly to our understanding of the universe. It has helped us discover and study objects such as black holes, which have a strong gravitational pull and can cause significant bending of light. It has also allowed us to observe and study distant galaxies and other celestial objects that would otherwise be invisible due to their distance from Earth.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
624
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
637
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top