The Einstein equation

  • Thread starter ghc
  • Start date
  • #1
ghc
17
0
Hi, i have read a introduction book to general relativity and i want to ask a question: how do physicists use the Einstein equation to solve problems? I mean how can we, starting with a given energy-momentum tensor, find the metric? Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
5,428
291
The well-known solutions ( well known to me, that is ) were not derived by starting with a EMT and solving the Einstein field equations for the metric. The Schwarzschild metric has zero Ricci tensor and so represents a vacuum near a spherically symmetric, non-rotating source. The spacetime derives its properties from spherical symmetry alone. I highly recommend the English translation of Scharzschilds paper.

The basic cosmological solution is derived from the principles of homogeneity ( same to all observers) and isotropy ( no preferred direction). It is a happy accident that the Einstein tensor of this line element ( Robertson-Walker) turns out to describe a space filled with non-interacting, pressureless ( no collisions) dust. This leads to the Friedmann equations which link the expansion rate to the energy density, ( and look where that got us - Dark Matter ).

There are probably numerical methods available to solve the EFE, but it's doubtful whether closed algebraic solutions even exist for most general EMTs.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
ghc
17
0
Thank you!

I have another question: is there a formula in which the Riemann tensor is related only to the metric and its derivatives? if yes, can this equation give numerical solutions to EFE?
 
  • #4
5,428
291
The Riemann tensor is only related to the metric and its derivatives. Isn't this in your book ?
[tex]R^{r}_{mqs} = \Gamma ^{r}_{mq,s}-\Gamma ^{r}_{ms,q}+\Gamma ^{r}_{ns}\Gamma ^{n}_{mq}-\Gamma ^{r}_{nq}\Gamma ^{n}_{ms}[/tex]
where
[tex]\Gamma^m_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}g^{mk}(g_{ak,b}+g_{bk,a}-g_{ab,k})[/tex]
The comma before an index indicates partial differentiation. The Ricci tensor is the contraction of the Riemann tensor on the first and third indices, and appears in the EFE.
 
  • #5
ghc
17
0
These two equations are in the book and tried to get one equation that relates the Riemann tensor to the metric and its derivatives by replacing all gamma's in formula (1) by their expression (done in formula (2)) then contracting the first and the third indices to express the Ricci tensor in terms of the metric. I have been very careful with all indices rules and i got a long equation containing many terms. I did not found how to simplify it, so i'm asking if there is a "simple" form of this equation? And if yes, can we use it to solve numerically the EFE?
 
  • #6
5,428
291
I can't see how the expression could be simplified.

I don't know enough about numerical relativity to answer your question. There ought to be information available on the internet, so a search would probably get something useful.
 
  • #7
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,454
835
I'm afraid the equation doesn't become any simpler than that; The Einstein's equations are quite horrible to write down explicitly in terms of the metric.
 
  • #8
5,428
291
ghc,

I forgot to mention that there's a very good free math program called Maxima, which runs on most OSs. It has a package called ctensor that can calculate most of the GR tensors, when given a metric. It also does frame calculations ( something you should investigate if you're not familiar with the concept ).

You can get Maxima and it's GUI interfaces xMaxima and wxMaxima here.
http://maxima.sourceforge.net/

Coming back to solving the EFE. I'm told by a correspondent who doesn't post here that the solution of the EFE is greatly simplified if you use the method of frame fields, aka "local Lorentz frames", aka "using Cartan's method of moving frames") . He gives a 'recipe' for this -

First, write down an frame Ansatz based upon assuming a combination of spacetime symmetry and what kind of motion you expect. For example, assume spherical symmetry and spherically symmetric collapse of spherical shells of test particles which our observers are riding on, a very simple frame Ansatz is:
[tex]

\begin{array}{rcl}
\vec{e}_1 & = & \partial_t - f \, \partial_r \\
\vec{e}_2 & = & \partial_r \\
\vec{e}_3 & = & \frac{1}{r} \, \partial_\theta \\
\vec{e}_4 & = & \frac{1}{r \, \sin(\theta)} \, \partial_\phi
\end{array}

[/tex]
where f is an undetermined function of r only, saying the rate of falling toward the origin depends only on r. Note that this Ansatz also says that differences in the t coordinate correspond to elapsed proper time measured by any of our infalling observers.

Second, demand that the Einstein tensor as measured by these observers have a given form, say that of an nonnull electrovacuum appropriate for a radial electrostatic field
[tex]

G^{ab} = \frac{q^2}{r^2} \, diag (1,-1,1,1)

[/tex]
where q is the charge. The great thing about using frames is that tensors like the EM stress-energy tensor have exactly the same form and behave the same way under boosts and rotations at an event as in flat spacetime.

In this example, we find an ODE for f which is easily solved giving
[tex]

f = \sqrt{ \frac{2m}{r} - \frac{q^2}{r^2} }

[/tex]
If we had demanded instead that the stress-energy tensor be the sum of the previous EM term plus a Lambda term
[tex]

G^{ab} = \frac{q^2}{r^2} \, diag (1,-1,1,1) + \frac{3}{R^2} \, diag \, (1,-1,-1,-1)

[/tex]
we would have found
[tex]

f = \sqrt{ \frac{2m}{r} - \frac{q^2}{r^2} + \frac{r^2}{R^2} }

[/tex]
I haven't studied this myself yet, and I may have made mistakes in transcription.

M
 
Last edited:
  • #9
45
0
I've always wondered what the EFE looks like in terms of just the metric and the stress-energy tensor. Figured I might try it out when I have some free time :) Anybody want to give it a go and TeX it for our amusem--erm, edification?
 

Related Threads on The Einstein equation

Replies
2
Views
673
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
525
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
57
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
4K
Top