1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The Gap Theory-spacetime theory

  1. Jun 1, 2003 #1
    This theory is fundamental physics theory.I tried to describe spacetime from new approach.I also tried to link General Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. I'm really sorry for the wrong translation in the first sentence of the manuscript ...
    It should be:I think that spacetime behaves as diffraction pattern,which slit moves through superspace with speed of light.My conclusions becomes from Heisenberg's relations and spacetime characteristics-it is isotropic and homogenuos(that the reason why it has to be invariant for all inertial systems).
    I devoloped new approach to black holes physics and spacetime quantization.This theory is fundamental physics theory.I tried to describe spacetime from new approach.I also tried to link General Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. That link are black holes and spacetime quantas. The theory isn't finished yet,but there are given some predictions I have found till now. In context is given brief math I have used in the theory for better understanding.The theory isn't complete yet,but it would be great if You cold give some comments about the research.
    I linked Quantum Physics and General Theory with principal function (S=mc Int ds) and S=int Ldt where L is lagrange function.ds is interval in Theory of Relativity.We have to calculate Lagrangian of perturbated 3D Harmonic Isotropic Oscillator. I did it and got it as some form of hypergeometric function 2F1(a,b,c,z).
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 1, 2003 #2
    The other part of theory

    Read attachment
     
  4. Jun 1, 2003 #3
    The third part of the theory

    Read ATTACHMENT
     
  5. Jun 1, 2003 #4
    The forth part-math of the theory

    Read ATTACHMENT
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Jun 1, 2003 #5
    How to actually READ the ATTACHMENT?
     
  7. Jun 1, 2003 #6

    FZ+

    User Avatar

    What attachment?
     
  8. Jun 1, 2003 #7

    chroot

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Who the hell are these wackos?

    - Warren
     
  9. Jun 1, 2003 #8
    Info about attachment-really sorry

    It seems that attachment option didn't work on the forum.I'll give You then web page on the other forum where the pdf is located.
    http://www.msnusers.com/TheoreticalScience/msgattachments/16 [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  10. Jun 1, 2003 #9

    Eh

    User Avatar

    I think you got the wrong forum.
     
  11. Jun 2, 2003 #10
    That doesn't work. Why dont you explain it here?
     
  12. Jun 2, 2003 #11
    Re: Info about attachment-really sorry

    Did you read the pdf file? If you were,I'll say yes there is a lot of math,but that math isn't the whole math I used.There is a lot of mathematics in solving the Lagrangian of perturbated 3D Harmonic Oscillator for first order perturbation in Gravity field.Do You think that this is for theoretical physics?
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2003
  13. Jun 2, 2003 #12
    Passwords and username for the theory!!!

    Mr and Mrs here are the password and username to read the Theory:
    username:fila16us@yahoo.com
    password:fermijum

    I cannot explain it without proper math!!!
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2003
  14. Jun 2, 2003 #13

    Eh

    User Avatar

    Re: Re: Info about attachment-really sorry

    It was in the theory development section of the old forum, was it not? It seems the "holes theory" has a name change, but as an alternative idea, it seems that theory development is where it is headed.
     
  15. Jun 2, 2003 #14
    Re: Re: Re: Info about attachment-really sorry

    Yes it was on the old forum,but in the Gap theory ideas are outspead.
     
  16. Jun 3, 2003 #15

    Phobos

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    off to T.D. this goes!
     
  17. Jun 4, 2003 #16
    How to write metric and math symbols like ratio and Sum

    Help!!!
    How Can I write ratio ans Sum here?I need it to show you metric I got
     
  18. Jun 5, 2003 #17
    This is the metric

    Sorry but it's in attachment
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jun 9, 2003
  19. Sep 21, 2003 #18
  20. Sep 26, 2003 #19
    I hope that you can read format.If you don't understand any part of the theory please ask!
     
  21. Oct 10, 2003 #20
    The Gap Theory Basic Ideas

    Hi,I'll try to give You better explanation.
    As we know all physics laws that describes behaviour of some physical system are consequence of interections between physical system parts.So when we know or assume some properties of physical system parts and its interaction,we are able to form General Physical Theory for that system,which would give us all laws for that system.
    Physical Theory which I'm representing should describe spacetime system,with these postulates:
    1.Spacetime behaves as diffraction pattern
    2.It is homogenuos and isotropic
    3.Maximal speed is speed of light in vacuum
    The first paragraph desribes why I've included the 1st postulate,and uses formula that descibes diffraction on one slit to approach new interparetation linking Quantum Mechancs basic ideas.
    Other part gives explanation of spacetime and black hole analogy or equality,and products are black hole energy law,black hole evaporiation.
    It is interesting to say that energy expression of black hole is same as Hawking's,but here is included too grade crossing from star to black hole.The main conclusion is that in the time of black hole forming energy frees,and black hole-spacetime build new linked structure(Like protons and neutrons build nucleus).Also the law of black hole evaporiation is almost same as Hawking's theory predicts,but there is difference when black hole radius reaches Planck's length.According to this model,black hole would explode.
    This model also gives spacetime ground energy,and it predicts that space time emitts own virtual particles in Planck's time intervals,or in other words that are time quantas which spacetime emitts.That quantas could interact with other virtual pairs and product REAL particle,so this model in some way(not yet finished) view of Universe matter creation.
    And the last part gives metrics,which is expressed like Gauss' hypergeometric function.
    I hope that this would help to better understanding and folowing of the theory arguments,
    S.V.Radic
     
  22. Oct 13, 2003 #21
    The hypergeometric Gauss function

    I'll give you site where you can see graph of gauss hypergeometric function which in The Gap Theory defines metrics:
    http://www.aero.ufl.edu/~uhk/hyper3.jpg [Broken]
    (1D case)
    Best wishes S.V.Radic
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  23. Nov 6, 2003 #22
    The Gap Theory Basic Ideas

    ,I'll try to give You better explanation.
    As we know all physics laws that describes behaviour of some physical system are consequence of interections between physical system parts.So when we know or assume some properties of physical system parts and its interaction,we are able to form General Physical Theory for that system,which would give us all laws for that system.
    Physical Theory which I'm representing should describe spacetime system,with these postulates:
    1.Spacetime behaves as diffraction pattern
    2.It is homogenuos and isotropic
    3.Maximal speed is speed of light in vacuum
    The first paragraph desribes why I've included the 1st postulate,and uses formula that descibes diffraction on one slit to approach new interparetation linking Quantum Mechancs basic ideas.
    Other part gives explanation of spacetime and black hole analogy or equality,and products are black hole energy law,black hole evaporiation.
    It is interesting to say that energy expression of black hole is same as Hawking's,but here is included too grade crossing from star to black hole.The main conclusion is that in the time of black hole forming energy frees,and black hole-spacetime build new linked structure(Like protons and neutrons build nucleus).Also the law of black hole evaporiation is almost same as Hawking's theory predicts,but there is difference when black hole radius reaches Planck's length.According to this model,black hole would explode.
    This model also gives spacetime ground energy,and it predicts that space time emitts own virtual particles in Planck's time intervals,or in other words that are time quantas which spacetime emitts.That quantas could interact with other virtual pairs and product REAL particle,so this model in some way(not yet finished) view of Universe matter creation.
    And the last part gives metrics,which is expressed like Gauss' hypergeometric function.
    I hope that this would help to better understanding and folowing of the theory arguments,
    According to the Gap theory,spacetime pruduces real particles,with some probability of course...So,before Big Bang there could exist particles,and in the preBig Bang period number of particles per volume of the space would be very small,but they could aggregate anf form the first black hole,which would explode and that's actually the Big Bang.But this theory doesn't limit only to one Big Bang--->There could be more!!!(Temperature that develops at the moment of Black hole explosion is the same as predicted in Big Bang procces!).
    1.According to the Gap Theory-->Spacetime without Real particle cannot exists in time greater of ~e-43s.
    2.Spacetime is isotropic and behaves as 4D Quantum Harmonic Oscillator--->There has to be maximal speed in the field R.
    3.There is possibility for spacetime travell,"faster" than light(spacetime jump-->bypass Special Theory--->spacetime bending).
    4.There are not singularities and General Theory is consistent with Quantum Mechanics,because when the length L is L=0,there is SUBSPACE in our Universe,that cannot be measure or determined experimentaly in which L>0=Planck' length.
    5.Planck's length is the least distance in our Universe

    S.V.Radic
     
  24. Nov 7, 2003 #23
    Re: The third part of the theory

    let us say that the universe is a threedimensional net.
    In the beginning no direction was "the" direction.
    If one origo moved, nothing said that all the others should
    move in the same direction and nothing said that no
    origo should move. The net was in a chaos, all over the universe.

    As a consequence of this, net moves either from or against
    points in the universe. Points the net move from are called source and points the net moves against are called source (instead of plus or minus). Therefore boblock's spring function is correct.
    (see picture).

    [PLAIN]http://www.beotel.yu/~mmalovic/boblock/ma13.gif [Broken]

    That two sources repell eachother and two sinks repell eachother is more advansed physic.

    This is more stabile:
    +-
    -+
    than this:
    ++
    --

    Let's say that length passes through every point with the speed c.
    then c is the hypothenus of a triangle with one chatet "length passing" and the other the speed v

    (in which the point moves in this case seen from a third reference system)

    or else the length passing would be (c^2 + v^2)^0,5 which is a prediction.

    this is also true for another point moving in the speed w
    and we get
    R1 (c^2 - v^2) = R2 (c^2 - v^2). We multiply this with length passing (LP) in the unit c m that in my theory is time messaured in c s and we get:

    R2 (c^2(LP)^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2) = R2 (c^2(LP)^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2)

    and thereby

    R1 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - c^2(LP)^2) = R2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - c^2(LP)^2)

    That there are four coordinates does not mean that there are four dimensions.

    But R1 s^2(1 + i) is still R2 s^2(1 + i) cause all distances
    are not zero really.

    I would not see time as an dimension, even if it is a coordinate.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    låt oss säga att universum är ett tredimensionellt nät.
    I början var ingen riktning riktningen.
    Om ett origo rörde sig, sa ingenting att alla dom andra borde
    röra sig i samma riktning och ingenting sa att inget
    origo borde röra sig. Nätet var i ett kaos, över hela universum.

    som en konsekvens utav det här rör sig nät antingen från eller emot punkter i universum. punkter nätet rör sig mot kallas brunn och punkter nätet rör sig ifrån kallas källor (istället för plus eller minus). Därför stämmer Boblocks källfunktion
    (se bild).

    [PLAIN]http://www.beotel.yu/~mmalovic/boblock/ma13.gif [Broken]

    Att två källor repellerar varandra och två brunnar repellerar varandra är mera avancerad fysik.

    -+ --
    Det här är mer stabilt: +- än det här: ++


    Låt oss säga att längd passerar genom varje punkt med hastigheten c. Då är c hypotenusan av en triangel med en katet "den passerande längden" och den andra hastigheten v

    (I vilken punkten rör sig i det här fallet sett ifrån ett tredje referenssystem)

    annars skulle den passerande längden vara (c^2 - v^2)^0,5 vilket säger emot sig självt.

    Det här är också sant för en annan punkt rörandes sig i hastigheten c och vi får
    R1 (c^2 - v^2) = R2 (c^2 - v^2). Vi multiplicerar det här med den passerande längden (PL) i enheten c m som i min teori är tid mätt i c s och vi får:

    R2 (c^2(PL)^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2) = R2 (c^2(PL)^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2)

    och därmed:

    R1 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - c^2(PL)^2) = R2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - c^2(PL)^2)

    Men R1 s^2(1 + i) är fortfarande R2 s^2(1 + i) för alla avstånd
    är inte noll egentligen.

    Jag skulle inte se tiden som en dimension,
    även om den är en koordinat.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  25. Jan 6, 2004 #24
    Understanding of the Gap Theory

    If you understood the Gap Theory then you'll be able to answer these questions:
    1.Why time arrow is dirreted to rise entropy?
    2.How friction and other forces break(unbreak)spacetime symetry?
    3.Creation of the universe?
    4.What happens with black holes when their mass reaches small masses?
    5.What is energy limit for unified theory,and does it depend of spacetime state?
    6.Why there has to be limited speed?
    7.Is space-time travell theoreticaly possible?
     
  26. Jan 6, 2004 #25
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook