The gold leaf electroscope and the photoelectric effect

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a gold leaf electroscope in relation to the photoelectric effect. The original poster expresses confusion about the liberation of electrons when light is shone on the electroscope's top plate and the implications for the charge of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the fate of liberated electrons and their effect on the electroscope's charge. Some participants suggest that the electroscope may be charged by direct contact with a negatively charged rod, leading to a net negative charge throughout the system. Others propose that electrons liberated from the plate could create an electron cloud in the surroundings.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the electroscope's behavior under illumination. Some guidance has been offered regarding the charging process and the potential for electron emission, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of assumptions regarding the initial charging method of the electroscope and the nature of electron liberation, which remain under discussion.

zoya76
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The theory I have read
When you charge an electroscope with a negatively charged rod, electrons are repelled to the bottom of the electroscope and the gold leaf rises. Then when you shine light above the fundamental frequency on the top plate of the electroscope, electrons are liberated from the plate and the leaf falls.

What I don't understand
Where are these electrons liberated too? Where do they go? And are they dragged up from the gold leaf before being liberated somewhere? If they are liberated from the plate itself (too somewhere) then surely the plate will get even more positively charged and therefore the leaf would stay elevated. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello zoya76,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Maybe the problem statement is implying that the electrocsope is charged by touching the top plate with the negatively charged rod. That would give a net negative charge to the whole kit and kaboodle (i.e. the top plate and the gold leaf). This would cause the gold leaf to rise due to its net negative charge, and the top plate would maintain a negative charge too (that is, until you neutralize the whole thing by blasting some electrons off the top plate by shining a high-frequency light on it).
 
Last edited:
zoya76 said:
The theory I have read
When you charge an electroscope with a negatively charged rod, electrons are repelled to the bottom of the electroscope and the gold leaf rises. Then when you shine light above the fundamental frequency on the top plate of the electroscope, electrons are liberated from the plate and the leaf falls.

What I don't understand
Where are these electrons liberated too? Where do they go? And are they dragged up from the gold leaf before being liberated somewhere? If they are liberated from the plate itself (too somewhere) then surely the plate will get even more positively charged and therefore the leaf would stay elevated. Am I missing something?

I think that initially the electrons are liberated into the surroundings and form an electron cloud which expands under mutual repulsion as more electrons are added.I have a vague memory of something called the Richardson Dushman equation which quantifies the cloud formed by thermionic emission.Try googling to see if this equation or some sort of variation of it can be applied to photoelectric emission and answer your question in greater depth.
 
Thanks guys. It makes sense now. I think I'll have to use this forum more frequently!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K