Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Atomic and Condensed Matter
The heuristic understanding of polarization operator?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="BigJDubs, post: 6898556, member: 596078"] The relationship that the book mentions is actually a variation of the classical polarization formula. In classical electrodynamics, the polarization P is defined as the ratio of the induced electric dipole moment (δρ) to the applied electric field (δV). This is the same relationship that is mentioned in the book, but using the total potential instead of just the external potential. Therefore, while there is a similarity between the classical polarization formula and the one mentioned in the book, the two formulas are not exactly the same. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Atomic and Condensed Matter
The heuristic understanding of polarization operator?
Back
Top