The Higgs superpartner?

  • I
  • Thread starter hyksos
  • Start date
  • #1
hyksos
29
10
TL;DR Summary
SUSY supersymmetry Higgsino
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson. Does this low mass mean we should have already found the Higgsino in experiments?

Any other notes we should know about the Higgsino?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
29,927
15,605
Internet sources

Hey why look at those stuffy old peer-reviewed papers when you have a couple of guys on the internet?

Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

I think you just made this up. You didn't give a source, and if you did get it from elsewhere, they don't know what they are talking about.
  1. In SUSY, the SM Higgs sector has at least five particles.
  2. There are therefore five SUSY partners.
  3. These particles mix with gauginos, so in general there is no particle that is a pure "higgsino".
  4. Obviously then a statement about mass is meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #3
41,290
18,918
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
 
  • #4
hyksos
29
10
Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
Roger Penrose has claimed that spin-0 particles would in all cases be more massive than their superpartners. This would also include the Higgs being more massive than its superpartner, the Higgsino, ( as the Higgs is spin-0. ) He seems to imply that this follows from the non-existence of negative spin.

This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

The Road to Reality A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe.
Vintage; Reprint edition (January 9, 2007)
ISBN-10: 0679776311

ISBN-13: 978-0679776314
 
  • #5
41,290
18,918
This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

This is a pop science book, not a textbook or peer-reviewed paper. As such, it is not a valid source for PF discussion.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Suggested for: The Higgs superpartner?

Replies
5
Views
609
Replies
16
Views
825
Replies
6
Views
680
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top