Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The independance of horizontal and vertical motion

  1. Jun 22, 2005 #1
    The independance of horizontal and vertical motion....

    Obviously it is possible to prove the independance of horizontal and vertical motion empirically - we only need look at projectile motion following a parabolic path. However, I have never found a convincing algebraic proof the for the independence of these 2 types of motion.

    I have asked my physics teacher and he says that it can apparetly be proved by treating Gravity as a Vector, and then assessing the overall motion of a body - apparently things like "gcos90" appears, which obviously equal "0", and this can be used to show the independance of horizontal and vertical motion.

    If anyone could supply me with a convincing algebriac proof i would be really greatful! :tongue2:

    Thanks in advance. :smile:
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 22, 2005 #2

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    What do you mean by "algebraic proof"? If you accept the mathematical concept of a vector, then if you have the vector oriented along the x-axis, can you find the component of the vector along the y-axis?

    Zz.
     
  4. Jun 22, 2005 #3

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The x and y unit vectors are orthogonal, thus the x and y components can be treated seperately. A ZapperZ pointed out, there really is no algebraic proof to consider.

    Claude.
     
  5. Jun 22, 2005 #4

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You also need to define how vectors multiply before you can say that[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] and [tex]\hat{y}[/tex] are orthagonal. A metric such as

    ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2

    is one way of giving the necessary defintion of the vector product [tex]\hat{x} \cdot \hat{y}[/tex], and a diagonal metric such as the specific example above is necessary and sufficient to make these two vectors orthagonal.
     
  6. Jun 23, 2005 #5

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You can't prove a physical fact mathematically! They can only be proven by experiment (what you called "empirically").

    (If you assume that physical velocity can be represented by mathematical vectors, then you can use the properties of vectors. Of course, you would have to base that "assumption" on experiment.)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?