Is the Death Penalty in the USA Effective or Ineffective?

  • News
  • Thread starter naima
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Hill
In summary: I live in Europe where it disappeared. I think that USA is accustomed to violence.Do you think that, if the death penalty is abolished in the USA, it would not be effective as a deterrent?Please, Evo, tell me if a question about it is acceptable.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is a difficult case mainly because his IQ is apparently exactly on the necessarily grey dividing line for determining mental disability. But given that you listed several countries that utilize it, I suspect your main issue is with the death penalty itself. I support it.
 
  • #3
naima said:
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/should-a-man-with-an-iq-of-70-be-on-death-row-8503801.html

He is no more breathing
I read a list of countries sorted by number of death sentence:
China, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, USA.

Any comment?
Please state what you wish to discuss.

The article states that he has the death penalty due to this crime
he bludgeoned his prison cellmate to death with a board studded with nails
Did he make this board? He's killed twice, and killing a cellmate means that if he doesn't get the death penalty, he would spend the rest of his life in solitary confinement as he is unsafe and cannot be with others. Is this what you want? And in the future, please do not just post a link to an article and ask "what do you think", that's not acceptable.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
And it may make more sense to compare the number of death sentences per , say, 100,000 and not just the sheer number. Obvious problems with death sentence:
1)Irreversibility 2) It is difficult to know how good of a deterrent it is. But I have to admit that if I were given a life sentence, I would prefer death to it.
 
  • #5
My question is about death sentence.
Please, Evo, tell me if a question about it is acceptable.
I live in Europe where it disappeared. I think that USA is accustomed to violence.
Here gansters and terrorists have kalashnikovs but citizens have not.
I believe that it must be difficult for you to look at the american society from outside.
America and USSR delivered us from nazism . We thank you but accept that things must evolve
 
  • #6
WWGD said:
And it may make more sense to compare the number of death sentences per , say, 100,000 and not just the sheer number. Obvious problems with death sentence:
1)Irreversibility 2) It is difficult to know how good of a deterrent it is. But I have to admit that if I were given a life sentence, I would prefer death to it.

2

From practical reasons:
-in the USA in 2013 there are over 159 000 people serving life sentence
http://www.sentencingproject.org/detail/news.cfm?news_id=1636&id=107

-in 2013 there were 39 executions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_capital_punishment_by_country#Americas

If someone is not deterred by reasonable chance of life sentence, should he be afraid of hypothetical chance of death penalty after a decade in prison? Especially that now, with al those moratoria and lenghty appeal procedures, he may hope that before he is being put on death row (where execution rate is around 2% per year) this punishment may be already abolished?

Of course that can be also interpreted that system was (purposefully?) turned out ineffective and now its being used as argument that this punishment is ineffective as such.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

What is "The killing of Warren Hill"?

"The killing of Warren Hill" refers to the controversial execution of Warren Hill, a man with intellectual disabilities, by the state of Georgia in 2015. Hill's execution sparked national and international outcry due to the ethical concerns surrounding the execution of a person with intellectual disabilities.

Why was Warren Hill executed?

Warren Hill was executed for the murder of his cellmate, Joseph Handspike, in 1990 while serving a life sentence for the murder of his girlfriend. Despite evidence of Hill's intellectual disabilities, the state of Georgia deemed him fit to be executed.

What were the ethical concerns surrounding Warren Hill's execution?

The main ethical concern surrounding Hill's execution was the fact that he had been diagnosed with intellectual disabilities, which is a mitigating factor for the death penalty according to the Supreme Court. Many argued that Hill's execution would be a violation of his constitutional rights and against the principles of a just and fair legal system.

What attempts were made to stop Warren Hill's execution?

Several attempts were made to stop Warren Hill's execution, including appeals to the Supreme Court and a petition for clemency to the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles. However, all attempts were unsuccessful and Hill was ultimately executed.

What impact did Warren Hill's execution have on the debate surrounding the death penalty for people with intellectual disabilities?

Warren Hill's execution sparked renewed debate and scrutiny over the use of the death penalty for individuals with intellectual disabilities. It also highlighted the need for more consistent and accurate evaluation of intellectual disabilities in capital cases. Some states have since passed laws prohibiting the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities, while others continue to allow it under certain circumstances.

Similar threads

Replies
133
Views
24K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top