Kilogram in France: Double-Bell or Triple-Bell Jar?

  • Thread starter elPhys
  • Start date
In summary, there is some discrepancy among sources regarding the number of bell jars used to hold the prototype kilogram. While some sources show it in a double-bell jar, others show it in a triple-bell jar. This can be seen on the BIPM website and in the third edition of Halliday and Resnick. There may be some historical context behind this difference, or it could be due to varying definitions of what constitutes a "true" bell jar.
  • #1
elPhys
1
0
Some sources say it's held in a double-bell jar while others say it's a triple-bell jar. What's the scoop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a photo on the BIPM website, so see for yourself:approve:

http://www.bipm.org/en/scientific/mass/pictures_mass/prototype.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
But in the third edition of Halliday and Resnick it shows a picture of it in what appears to be a double bell jar.

So is there some history I'm missing? Was it originally in a double bell jar and then another bell jar added later?

Or maybe the outer "bell jar" isn't considered by some to be a true bell jar (since it doesn't have a knob at the top), and the Halliday and Resnick photo was zoomed into take a picture of just the inner two jars?
 
  • #4
Free the kilogram! Free the kilogram!11!
 
  • #5


I can provide some clarification on the discrepancy regarding the use of double-bell and triple-bell jars for the kilogram in France. The kilogram is currently defined by the International System of Units (SI) as the mass of a specific platinum-iridium alloy cylinder known as the International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK). This cylinder is housed in a special container, known as the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) jar, which is designed to protect it from environmental factors and maintain its mass.

The BIPM jar has evolved over the years, and there have been different versions used in France. In the early 20th century, the jar was made of a double-bell design, with the IPK suspended in the center and two bells on either side. However, in the 1980s, the jar was redesigned to a triple-bell design, with the IPK suspended in the center and three bells surrounding it.

Both versions of the jar have been used in France, and there is no definitive answer as to which is currently being used. However, it is important to note that the design of the jar does not affect the mass of the IPK, as the IPK is the actual standard for the kilogram, not the jar. The jar is simply a protective container.

In conclusion, while there may be conflicting information about the type of jar used to house the kilogram in France, it is ultimately not a significant factor in the accurate measurement of the kilogram. The important thing to remember is that the kilogram is defined by the mass of the IPK, and this standard is carefully maintained by the BIPM.
 

1. What is the history of the "Kilogram in France"?

The "Kilogram in France" refers to the standard unit of measurement for mass in France, which is currently based on the International Prototype Kilogram (IPK) stored at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in France. The IPK was originally created in 1799 and is a platinum-iridium double-bell jar. It was officially adopted as the standard unit of measurement for mass in France in 1795.

2. What is the significance of the double-bell jar design?

The double-bell jar design of the IPK was chosen because it was believed to provide the most accurate and consistent measurement of mass. The two bell-shaped plates balanced on either side of the jar allowed for equal distribution of mass, reducing the effects of gravity and air currents on the measurement.

3. Why is there controversy surrounding the "Kilogram in France"?

In recent years, there have been concerns about the accuracy and stability of the IPK. It has been found to be slightly different in mass compared to its official copies, which were made in 1884 and distributed to other countries as their standard units of measurement. This has led to discussions about finding a more precise and consistent definition of the kilogram.

4. What is the proposed solution to the controversy surrounding the "Kilogram in France"?

The proposed solution is to redefine the kilogram in terms of a fundamental physical constant, such as Planck's constant, rather than relying on a physical object like the IPK. This would create a more stable and universally accepted definition of the kilogram.

5. How will the redefinition of the kilogram affect everyday use of the "Kilogram in France"?

The redefinition of the kilogram will not have a significant impact on everyday use of the "Kilogram in France." The new definition will still be based on the IPK and its official copies, so the difference in mass will be minimal. However, it will provide a more precise and consistent standard for international trade and scientific research.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
862
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
190
Views
9K
Replies
71
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
988
Replies
1
Views
906
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
25
Replies
874
Views
30K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
Back
Top