The life of sub particles

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of subatomic particles and their behavior in the vacuum. It is debated whether these particles are actively seeking to remain alive or if they are simply a result of the energy ground state. The conversation also touches on the terminology used to describe these particles and suggests further reading to better understand their behavior. Ultimately, it is concluded that there is no interaction strong enough to cause particles to condense in the vacuum state.f
  • #1
3
1
Hi everyone!

Here the question(s).

In the vacuum, the sub particles pop up and down (annihilation).
If this is right, we can tell that the all matter is the attempt of sub particles to remain alive?

so, is my glass of wine a desperate attempt of electrons, quarks, and all the other particles, to stay present here and now in this quantum state?

cheers!
 
  • #2
What exactly is this “sub particle” that you are talking about?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bhobba
  • #3
In the vacuum, the sub particles pop up and down (annihilation).
There is no such process. You might think of virtual particles which you can frequently find in popular science description, but virtual particles are not real (that's why they are called virtual).
The matter you can see is made out of real particles.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bhobba
  • #5
What exactly is this “sub particle” that you are talking about?

Zz.
Hi ZapperZ,
I meant the subatomic particles described by the standard model... is it wrong to call "sub particles"?
 
  • #6
Hi ZapperZ,
I meant the subatomic particles described by the standard model... is it wrong to call "sub particles"?

It is wrong to describe these particles they way YOU did!

Zz.
 
  • #7
It is wrong to describe these particles they way YOU did!

Zz.
I'm almost happy to hear that! Mean that i think in wrong way, and i need to fix this. May i ask you what can i read to understand the right way to describe these particles?
 
  • #8
I'm almost happy to hear that! Mean that i think in wrong way, and i need to fix this. May i ask you what can i read to understand the right way to describe these particles?

Read the responses that you have received.

Zz.
 
  • #9
Hi everyone!

Here the question(s).

In the vacuum, the sub particles pop up and down (annihilation).
If this is right, we can tell that the all matter is the attempt of sub particles to remain alive?

so, is my glass of wine a desperate attempt of electrons, quarks, and all the other particles, to stay present here and now in this quantum state?

cheers!

If you substitute real particles and seeking lowest energy ground state for virtual particles and attempting to stay alive, I think there is a relationship something like what you are pondering... a relationship between energy and density of particles that attract each other in which the energy ground state with particles is lower than the empty vacuum energy ground state... the particles condensing out of the vacuum lowers the ground energy state.

Maybe someone that recognizes my poor description can clarify the principle.
 
  • #10
If you substitute real particles and seeking lowest energy ground state for virtual particles and attempting to stay alive, I think there is a relationship something like what you are pondering... a relationship between energy and density of particles that attract each other in which the energy ground state with particles is lower than the empty vacuum energy ground state... the particles condensing out of the vacuum lowers the ground energy state.

Maybe someone that recognizes my poor description can clarify the principle.
As a particle physicist: I have no idea what you are talking about.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, vanhees71, weirdoguy and 1 other person
  • #11
"Normally the "vacuum state", which is the state of minimum energy of a quantum system, is that state in which one expects to find no real particles, because the energy of the system increases as you add real massive particles. If the interactions between the particles are attractive, one might imagine that the minimum energy configuration is not one with an absence of real particles, but rather one in which a nonzero density of real particles "condenses" into this vacuum state."
Krauss, particle physicist
 
  • #12
There is no interaction attractive enough to make that happen. The Higgs potential could be in a metastable state and decay eventually, but that is a different topic.
 

Suggested for: The life of sub particles

Replies
15
Views
361
Replies
2
Views
130
Replies
10
Views
845
Replies
48
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
871
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
618
Back
Top