Uncertainty Over Sextans Galaxies' Group Membership

In summary: Local Group and their distances from the Sun.In summary, the Sextans galaxies are possibly not part of the local group, and there is uncertainty over whether they are part of the group.
  • #1
Si_187
6
0
Hi all. Awesome site! Just wondering if anyone can answer my question:

If the Sextans galaxies are inside the group's zero velocity surface, why is there uncertainty over whether they're part of the group?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Si_187 said:
Hi all. Awesome site! Just wondering if anyone can answer my question:

If the Sextans galaxies are inside the group's zero velocity surface, why is there uncertainty over whether they're part of the group?
Could you point to an example of where such uncertainty is expressed?
 
  • Like
Likes Si_187
  • #3
Ophiolite said:
Could you point to an example of where such uncertainty is expressed?

The opening paragraphs on the Wikipedia articles for Sextans A and B both describe them as possibly being part of the local group.

Interestingly there is a similar uncertainty over the Saggitarius Dwarf Irregular Galaxy, despite that lying outside the zero-velocity surface.

Perhaps the zero-velocity surface is only a rough estimate or not a concrete theorem?
 
  • #4
Si_187 said:
If the Sextans galaxies are inside the group's zero velocity surface, why is there uncertainty over whether they're part of the group?

Hmmm. One source I found states that they are significantly outside the zero-velocity surface.
From here: https://www.universetoday.com/27388/turning-the-tides-ngc-3109-by-ken-crawford/

What makes NGC 3109 and its little band of followers so interesting? Well, chances are it may not be a member of our Local Group at all, but the nearest of the outsiders. “The small Antlia-Sextans clustering of galaxies is located at a distance of only 1.36 Mpc from the Sun and 1.72 Mpc from the adopted barycenter of the Local Group. The latter value is significantly greater than the radius of the zero-velocity surface of the Local Group that, for an assumed age of 14 Gyr, has R_0=1.18+/-0.15 Mpc.” says Sidney Van den Bergh, “This, together with the observation that the members of the Ant-Sex group have a mean redshift of 114+/-12 km s^-1 relative to the centroid of the Local Group, suggests that the Antlia-Sextans group is not bound to our Local Group and that it is expanding with the Hubble flow. If this conclusion is correct, then Antlia-Sextans may be the nearest external clustering of galaxies.”
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Si_187
  • #5
Ah ok yeah, incorrect assumption from me to begin with that they were within the zero-velocity surface. Along with them being strongly red-shifted (at least Saggitarius Dwarf Irregular is blue-shifted) it seems kinda odd that they would ever be considered within the local group then.

This zero-velocity surface business sounds fascinating to me. Especially having just read the Three Body Problem :)
 
  • #6
Si_187 said:
The opening paragraphs on the Wikipedia articles for Sextans A and B both describe them as possibly being part of the local group.

Interestingly there is a similar uncertainty over the Saggitarius Dwarf Irregular Galaxy, despite that lying outside the zero-velocity surface.

Perhaps the zero-velocity surface is only a rough estimate or not a concrete theorem?
Thanks. Since you didn't specify Sextans A and B I mistakenly thought you were referencing the Sextans galaxy that I understand is a satellite of ours.
 
  • Like
Likes Si_187
  • #7
Ophiolite said:
Thanks. Since you didn't specify Sextans A and B I mistakenly thought you were referencing the Sextans galaxy that I understand is a satellite of ours.

Wow didn't even realize we had a satellite Sextans dwarf galaxy, there's that many dwarf galaxies knocking about.

Its funny, this topic is no doubt considered niche in the physics community, but we're talking about the very frontier that humanity can ever reach considering the cosmological horizon.
 
  • #8
Here's the current situation regarding the Local Group. As of early 2019, the Local Group had more than 100 known members.

The following galaxies ARE members of the Local Group:

Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal (discovered in 1994; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Sagittarius Dwarf Irregular Galaxy (NOT a satellite of any galaxy)
Leo I (discovered in 1950; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Leo II (discovered in 1950; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Leo A (NOT a satellite of any galaxy)
Sextans Dwarf Spheroidal (discovered on February 8, 1990; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)

The following galaxies are NOT members of the Local Group but instead belong to the NGC 3109 Association:

Sextans A
Sextans B
Leo P (discovered in 2012)

References:

Magnificent Universe by Ken Croswell, pages 190-191.

"The Faintest Dwarf Galaxies" by Joshua Simon, Annual Reviews, 2019, in press. Table 1 lists 54 of the 57 known satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (it omits the two most massive, the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, and also the most recent discovery, Antlia 2).

"The Observed Properties of Dwarf Galaxies in and Around the Local Group" by Alan McConnachie, The Astronomical Journal, 144, 4 (2012). Table 1 gives the boundary between Local Group members and those beyond.

Sky and Telescope, October 2018, cover story.

The Alchemy of the Heavens by Ken Croswell. Pages vii-ix tell the story of the discovery of the Sextans dwarf that orbits the Milky Way.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Si_187 and davenn
  • #9
Si_187 said:
..., but we're talking about the very frontier that humanity can ever reach considering the cosmological horizon.
Humanity has no such limits. People have not left Earth's Hill sphere yet but that is not a barrier that is impossible to cross. Maffei and the Virgo cluster require higher delta-v and much longer flight times but it is just more difficult not impossible.
 
  • #10
stefan r said:
Humanity has no such limits. People have not left Earth's Hill sphere yet but that is not a barrier that is impossible to cross. Maffei and the Virgo cluster require higher delta-v and much longer flight times but it is just more difficult not impossible.

People haven't but man-made objects have gone way beyond Earth's hill sphere/zero-velocity limit.

The argument regarding humans never escaping the local group is based around objects outside it receeding from us faster than the speed of light by the time we could get to the edge of the group from the present day.

So if we can't travel faster than light (a very hard limit by most reckoning), then we'll never get to anything that's currently outside the local group. That's my understanding anyway, I may be wrong.
 
  • #11
CygnusX-1 said:
Here's the current situation regarding the Local Group. As of early 2019, the Local Group had more than 100 known members.

The following galaxies ARE members of the Local Group:

Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal (discovered in 1994; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Sagittarius Dwarf Irregular Galaxy (NOT a satellite of any galaxy)
Leo I (discovered in 1950; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Leo II (discovered in 1950; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)
Leo A (NOT a satellite of any galaxy)
Sextans Dwarf Spheroidal (discovered on February 8, 1990; a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way)

The following galaxies are NOT members of the Local Group but instead belong to the NGC 3109 Association:

Sextans A
Sextans B
Leo P (discovered in 2012)

References:

Magnificent Universe by Ken Croswell, pages 190-191.

"The Faintest Dwarf Galaxies" by Joshua Simon, Annual Reviews, 2019, in press. Table 1 lists 54 of the 57 known satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (it omits the two most massive, the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, and also the most recent discovery, Antlia 2).

"The Observed Properties of Dwarf Galaxies in and Around the Local Group" by Alan McConnachie, The Astronomical Journal, 144, 4 (2012). Table 1 gives the boundary between Local Group members and those beyond.

Sky and Telescope, October 2018, cover story.

The Alchemy of the Heavens by Ken Croswell. Pages vii-ix tell the story of the discovery of the Sextans dwarf that orbits the Milky Way.

That's awesome, thankyou!
 
  • #12
Si_187 said:
People haven't but man-made objects have gone way beyond Earth's hill sphere/zero-velocity limit.

The argument regarding humans never escaping the local group is based around objects outside it receeding from us faster than the speed of light by the time we could get to the edge of the group from the present day.

So if we can't travel faster than light (a very hard limit by most reckoning), then we'll never get to anything that's currently outside the local group. That's my understanding anyway, I may be wrong.
The Virgo Cluster is 16.5 Mparsec. The Hubble constant is around 70 km/s/Mparsec. So space expands at 1,155 km/s. That is 0.385% of light speed. If a star leaves the milky way at 2% of light speed it will eventually get there.
The Virgo Cluster will eventually cross the event horizon and then we will not hear any more messages from our colonies there.
 
  • #13
Si_187 said:
So if we can't travel faster than light (a very hard limit by most reckoning), then we'll never get to anything that's currently outside the local group. That's my understanding anyway, I may be wrong.
We won't get to anywhere significant within our own galaxy, let alone out of our galaxy to the nearest neighbour
 

1. What is the significance of uncertainty over Sextans Galaxies' group membership?

The uncertainty over Sextans Galaxies' group membership is significant because it affects our understanding of the structure and evolution of the universe. Group membership of galaxies can provide insights into their formation and interactions with other galaxies, and the uncertainty surrounding this can impact our understanding of these processes.

2. How is uncertainty over group membership determined?

Uncertainty over group membership is determined through various methods, such as analyzing the redshift of galaxies, their position in the sky, and their velocity relative to other galaxies. However, due to the complexity of the universe and the limitations of our technology, there is always a level of uncertainty in these measurements.

3. What factors contribute to uncertainty over group membership?

There are several factors that contribute to uncertainty over group membership, including the distance of galaxies from Earth, the presence of dark matter, and the gravitational pull of neighboring galaxies. Additionally, observational errors and limitations can also contribute to uncertainty.

4. How does uncertainty over group membership impact our understanding of the universe?

The uncertainty over group membership can impact our understanding of the universe by affecting our models and theories about the formation and evolution of galaxies. It can also impact our understanding of the distribution of matter in the universe and the influence of dark matter on galaxy dynamics.

5. What are the implications of uncertainty over group membership for future research?

The uncertainty over group membership highlights the need for continued research and advancements in technology to improve our understanding of the universe. It also emphasizes the importance of considering and accounting for uncertainty in our analyses and interpretations of data in order to make accurate conclusions about the nature of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
766
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
808
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top