Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The m->0 limit

  1. Sep 24, 2011 #1
    In Zee's textbook, the photon and "graviton" propagators are derived as the m->0 limit of massive spin 1,2 particles; this works for the photon, but not the graviton. Weinberg adds the caveat that we obtain electrodynamics from the massive theory only if we couple the particles to a conserved source. In Peskin and Schroeder, the Weyl equations are presented as the Dirac equation in the limit of vanishing mass, and as far as I know nothing goes wrong.

    Are there any general rules as to when it is and is not possible to derive the physics of a massless particle from the massive case?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 25, 2011 #2

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Zee: I think you're referring to the "2/3 anomaly"? Later on, pp 426-427, Zee gives the explanation for this paradox, namely that the limit m → 0 is not uniformly valid, and the discrepancy exists only beyond a characteristic distance scale which becomes indefinitely large as m → 0.

    Weinberg: The comment about coupling to a conserved source holds for both electromagnetism and gravity. In the case of electromagnetism the source is Jμ while for gravity it's Tμν, both of which are conserved.

    Dirac/Weyl: The difference is that the Dirac equation has both right-handed and left-handed solutions. If you take the limit m → 0 you'll wind up with a right-handed Weyl particle and a left-handed one also.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: The m->0 limit
  1. 0 temperture? (Replies: 2)

  2. The limit (Replies: 11)

Loading...