The Most Egotistical Creature in The World!

  • Thread starter Lisa!
  • Start date
Lisa!
Gold Member
601
90

Main Question or Discussion Point

Why do humans think everything belongs to them? I think alot about humans and other creatures and it seems that humans are the most useless creature for the other creatures. For sure the ability of thinking cause they invent lots of things and know the world better. But humans inventions and sience aren't useful for other creatures alot. And somehow they cause lots of problems for the environmemt and other creatures. Somehow we're making the world impossible to live for every creature.

What does give them the right to use animals for doing researches on them? Most of us may answer "We have touse them in order to save humans' lives"! But who said humans' lives are more important than animals! Just because they can't protest about that, we have the right to do everything we want!

For sure I'm not going to tell you humans and other creatures should be equal! You know I'm going to get some conclusion from this discussion. But first of all I want to get your ideas about that.

Are humans' lives more important than other creatures? Why?

PS: I'm not saying these because I prefer animals to some humans!
 

Answers and Replies

wolram
Gold Member
4,235
553
I think i prefer animals to some humans, some humans are
pure evil and don't deserve to exist, we would shoot a rabid dog without
a thought, but a rabid human has rights :yuck:

But then there are humans that are just so nice :biggrin:
 
loseyourname
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
1,717
5
It seems primarily a tradition of western civilization to think the earth belongs to us humans. It likely descends from the Abrahamic religious tradition, wherein the book of Genesis tells us that God gave man dominion over the earth and all its creatures. Not all civilizations thought this way. At least the Native American tradition that I partially grew up in teaches that we belong to the earth, and not the other way around. According to this tradition, we should honor and live in harmony with our environment, not 'tame' and claim dominion over it.
 
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,854
14
To us, yes, our lives are more important then other creatures. To cats, cats are more important then other creatures. To *insert animal*, *insert same animal* are more important then other creatures.

In some ways, we're actually less "egotistical" then other animals. Some animals will kill anything that looks yummy and spread their "territory" rather aggressively. If humans want to expand out somewhere or do something, oh well hey we need to go through all of societies rules and regulations and governmental instruments. At times we also put animals above human comforts (closing down various factories because a beetle is threatened). We're really doing what all creatures do and although we do some things that are beyond "natural" (like testing on animals), we also do things where we practically bow-down to animals (such as closing down our buildings or constructing habbitats for animals that cant survive on their own).

So if you think about it, we're all pretty much on par for how we and other animals act.
 
Lisa!
Gold Member
601
90
loseyourname said:
It seems primarily a tradition of western civilization to think the earth belongs to us humans. It likely descends from the Abrahamic religious tradition, wherein the book of Genesis tells us that God gave man dominion over the earth and all its creatures. Not all civilizations thought this way. At least the Native American tradition that I partially grew up in teaches that we belong to the earth, and not the other way around. According to this tradition, we should honor and live in harmony with our environment, not 'tame' and claim dominion over it.
Do we really honor the earth? And I think what are we donig on the earth, shows that we're claiming dominion over it. If we're worried about environment, that's because we think it would be impossible for humans to continue living on the earth 1 day! And we usually don't think about other creatures. Perhaps if we would be able to live on another planet, we forget all about the earth and environment!
 
462
0
Why do humans think everything belongs to them?
Well, if you want the religious reason, God gave man dominion over all the earth. Meaning man is dominate over all other creatures and has the right and ablility to cultivate the Earth to his liking. But God also said he will bring to ruin those ruining the Earth. So it comes with responsablility and consquences. This is basicly my stand point on the issue. Don't know if most Christians take note of the last part though.

humans are the most useless creature for the other creatures.
Doesn't matter because those creatures aren't important. :tongue:

Not really, because of humans species like cows, chickens, dogs, cats, etc are far more successful because of humans. They are far more likely to survive because they taste good or are cute and furry. :biggrin:

Not to mention that if a huge asteriod ever comes our way, we'll be the only species that has a chance of stopping it from killing trillions of animals.

What does give them the right to use animals for doing researches on them?
What gives animals the right to live?
 
russ_watters
Mentor
19,016
5,167
By all means, ask a lion or a shark if it values your life - but do keep your distance. :wink:
 
Lisa!
Gold Member
601
90
russ_watters said:
By all means, ask a lion or a shark if it values your life - but do keep your distance. :wink:
Forget about shark or loin.



Do you value my life as a human, russ? :wink: I really want to know if humans value each other's lives!
 
551
1
One of my house"mates" this year was seriously up himself.
 
wolram
Gold Member
4,235
553
Lisa! said:
Do you value my life !
I have £15, 56p, my fossil collection, still, stamp collection and a book, if thats
not enough i can get a night job :biggrin:
Humans are priceless even the one's that aren't the full shilling :biggrin:
 
Lisa!
Gold Member
601
90
Mr wolram said:
I have £15, 56p, my fossil collection, still, stamp collection and a book, if thats
not enough i can get a night job :biggrin:
Humans are priceless even the one's that aren't the full shilling :biggrin:
Sorry Sir. But I think it's aserious issue.
 
Averagesupernova
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,547
565
Lisa! said:
Are humans' lives more important than other creatures? Why?
I'll remember this question next time I am driving down the road and I have the choice of hitting a deer in the middle of the road or a human (you perhaps) walking along the side.
 
Good question Lisa! The answer is that no species is anymore entitled to be here than any other. Some humans believe otherwise, just because we're at the top of the food chain. Humans follow the laws of nature and survival just like any other creature. Some humans believe that humans are the only "animals" (hell some people don't even think humans could be "animal") that have souls! Ridiculous! It's all egotism, a trait basically exclusive to humanity, who has branched off of the strict focus of survival.

Pengwuino said:
In some ways, we're actually less "egotistical" then other animals. Some animals will kill anything that looks yummy and spread their "territory" rather aggressively. If humans want to expand out somewhere or do something, oh well hey we need to go through all of societies rules and regulations and governmental instruments. At times we also put animals above human comforts (closing down various factories because a beetle is threatened). We're really doing what all creatures do and although we do some things that are beyond "natural" (like testing on animals), we also do things where we practically bow-down to animals (such as closing down our buildings or constructing habbitats for animals that cant survive on their own).
Baloney! Animals like sharks or lions or what have you do what they do with the intention of SURVIVAL. Plain and simple. Humans are the only animals that will kill another species for fun, for a test or for a fassion statement! And those endangered species we try to save, they are endangered from humans! Otherwise why are we interfering with the course of nature?

Averagesupernova:

You should hit the deer and not the human. The reason is that killing a human would be quite the crime, whereas the authorities could care less if you hit the deer! That's the reason, and it's based on laws created by HUMANS! That does not mean it would be more unethical to hit the person (I think they would be equal).
 
JamesU
Gold Member
732
3
or you could hit lisa! and the deer and reduce the impact by 1/2 on both of them...

edit-wow this is a mean post.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters
Mentor
19,016
5,167
Lisa! said:
Forget about shark or loin.



Do you value my life as a human, russ? :wink: I really want to know if humans value each other's lives!
Yes. To an animal, a human is just another animal. To other humans, we're different.
 
russ_watters
Mentor
19,016
5,167
yomamma said:
or you could hit lisa! and the deer and reduce the impact by 1/2 on both of them...
No, sorry, hitting both would have little effect on the impact energy of hitting either.
 
brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,701
7
Mental Gridlock said:
Humans are the only animals that will kill another species for fun, for a test or for a fassion statement!
Have you ever seen a chicken coup after the fox has paid a visit?
 
loseyourname
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
1,717
5
russ_watters said:
By all means, ask a lion or a shark if it values your life - but do keep your distance. :wink:
They contribute positively to their ecosystems, which doesn't just mean keeping other animals alive. Life requires death. When lions and sharks kill, they are still contributing positively to their ecosystems. You can't say the same for humans. Since the industrial revolution, humans have decimated ecosystems across the planet. Respecting life means more than keeping individual organisms alive. It means keeping intact the cycles and systems that sustain life, cycles and systems that have evolved into careful equilibrium over hundreds of millions of years. Humans have a tendency to disrupt that equilibrium. I'm not saying other animals are any more virtuous - if they had the means as we do, chances are they'd be plundering and overusing resources too. What I am saying is that there are things more important than virtue. Whether biodiversity is sustained on this planet through accident or intent doesn't matter quite so much as that it is simply sustained.
 
loseyourname
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
1,717
5
Mental Gridlock said:
Humans are the only animals that will kill another species for fun, for a test or for a fassion statement.
Chimpanzees play around with and sometimes torture colobus monkeys before killing them for food. They also go on raiding parties looking for other chimpanzees that aren't part of their tribe. When they find one alone and vulnerable, they beat it and torture it, sometimes biting off its testicles and tearing the flesh from its bones, before finally murdering it. They'll continue doing this in systematic fashion until every member of an opposing tribe is wiped out.
 
yomamma said:
or you could hit lisa! and the deer and reduce the impact by 1/2 on both of them...
NICE!!! HAHAHAHA
 
brewnog said:
Have you ever seen a chicken coup after the fox has paid a visit?
Yeah the fox would be quite full! He got a good meal right? Does this contradict the laws of nature or something?
 
loseyourname said:
Chimpanzees play around with and sometimes torture colobus monkeys before killing them for food. They also go on raiding parties looking for other chimpanzees that aren't part of their tribe. When they find one alone and vulnerable, they beat it and torture it, sometimes biting off its testicles and tearing the flesh from its bones, before finally murdering it. They'll continue doing this in systematic fashion until every member of an opposing tribe is wiped out.
Why do they do that?
 
Killing members of an oppositte tribe is trying to gain a genetic advantage in an ecosystem which isn't contradictory to the laws of nature. Yeah cats may play with a mouse before they kill it too. But they eat it when they kill it. Have you seen another species kill something, tear off it's head, stuff it, place it on their mantle and not eat any of the flesh at all?
 
brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,701
7
Mental Gridlock said:
Yeah the fox would be quite full! He got a good meal right? Does this contradict the laws of nature or something?
A fox will kill all the chickens in a coup, usually taking just one for food, sometimes taking none at all. It just leaves them all dead. If the fox was doing it just for food, he'd only kill enough to feed him, thus ensuring a future supply of living chickens.
 
Last edited:
Did they do an experiment or somethin? I guess I have to take your word for it good point brewnog.
 

Related Threads for: The Most Egotistical Creature in The World!

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
45
Views
27K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
8K
Top