Murtha's Death Blow: End of Bush & GOP Running for Cover

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Death
In summary: I think you're confusing surrender with capitulation. Surrender means giving up something, capitulation means giving in. I don't think Bush has capitulated, he's just done what he thinks is best for the country. In summary, John Murtha called for the immediate withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, drawing a rebuke from top House Republicans.
  • #36
Skyhunter said:
And people will do just like russ did and say it was Murtha's proposal that was defeated. I would like to think russ just made a mistake, but there are many in the media who will spin it this way.

I agree that this little stunt won't get them very far before they have to confront reality. I have already contacted my rep's and let them know that I am aware of what happened.
With exception of the likes of Bill O'Reilly, the media is no longer presstituting for BushCo.

The American people are tired of congressional stunts and waste of time and tax dollars (i.e., Republican behavior). The American people now know they were deceived, and do not want to devote our military and tax dollars to a 20-year long neocon dream that has no basis for success. When Murtha said "Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We cannot continue on our present course," he is referring to this, and how it diminishes U.S. ability to address any other problems, including natural disasters like Katrina (i.e., real national security issues).

Those in Congress who voted against the straw man proposal should be thankful Murtha voted against it too, thus revealing the bogus nature of it. The American people no longer support the war, so if a realistic proposal for withdrawal is presented (and it will be) and these reps in Congress vote against it, they should prepare for new jobs after 2006. These con artists can go home for the holidays proud of themselves and enjoy their turkey, because if they keep this up they’re next for the chopping block.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
SOS2008 said:
With exception of the likes of Bill O'Reilly, the media is no longer presstituting for BushCo.
I'm not particularly any happier with their press-tituting for doom and gloom on every front from "Bring the troops home!" to Bird Flu.

The press seems fickle. I can only guess they play to the market. When the market drives the press, how can one say that it is an unbiased source of news? Add to that that they stoke the market with their reports ('press-tituting' to please their customers) and it just really isn't a good scene at all.

We all lose.

I'm leaning more towards the idea of getting your news from as many varied sources as possible, from overseas, from blogs, and from diverse opinions on global communities like this MB.
 
  • #38
Astronuc said:
I wonder how much went to executive bonuses.

I'm not sure about bonuses...

Halliburton CEO's stock rises by $78 million since Iraq invasion
15 Sept. 2005
WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 (HalliburtonWatch.org) -- War and skyrocketing oil prices have been good to Halliburton's CEO David Lesar, whose stock in the company increased by an estimated $78 million since the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, a HalliburtonWatch analysis reveals.

In March 2003, the first month of the Iraq invasion, corporate disclosure records show Lesar owned 1.476 million common shares and share options in Halliburton worth $30 million. At the end of stock trading yesterday, those shares were worth $93 million, for a $63 million gain. Subsequent to the Iraq invasion, Lesar boosted his total holdings in the company from $93 million to $108 million by acquiring a net 243,000 additional shares, thereby increasing his stock holdings by $78 million since March 2003.

Halliburton's stock price tripled since the Iraq invasion from $20 to $63.

Lesar owns an additional 644,575 shares of "restricted stock," or stock that may be sold only if he satisfies certain goals and requirements of the corporation. If Lesar is authorized by Halliburton to sell those shares, they would be worth an additional $40.8 million as of yesterday's closing stock price.

In the last 24 months, Lesar sold $18.8 million worth of Halliburton stock, with $16.3 million sold this year alone. [continued]
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/news/lesar_stock.html
 
  • #39
Schmidt causes ruckus in House debate on Iraq
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051119/NEWS01/511190372/1077/rss02
WASHINGTON - U.S. Rep. Jean Schmidt drew boos and angry shouting from Democrats as she brought the U.S. House to a standstill Friday by implying that a Democratic congressman who wants to pull troops out of Iraq is a coward.

Lawmakers were in the midst of a blistering debate on a resolution that called for the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., a decorated former Marine colonel, had pushed the measure to a vote.

Dressed in a red, white and blue suit, Schmidt, a Clermont County Republican and the most junior member of the House, took to the floor to protest the resolution.

She told her new colleagues of a phone call she had just received from freshman Ohio state Rep. Danny R. Bubp of West Union, a colonel in the Marine Corps Reserve.

"He asked me to send Congress a message: Stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message - that cowards cut and run, Marines never do," said Schmidt, of Miami Township. "Danny and the rest of America and the world want the assurance from this body that we will see this through."

Democrats booed and shouted at Schmidt as Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., charged across the chamber's center aisle screaming that her comments were an uncalled-for personal attack.
Apparently some Republicans were not pleased. Schmidt may not have known that Murtha is a decorated Marine himself.

I don't think Murtha or any other Democrat has proposed to cut and run. Instead, they have called for a withdrawal plan soon.

The proposal the other day, against which most Democrats voted, was a GOP-written resolution for immediate withdrawal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
The key point made that has caused me to question what may be the best course of action is this: By being there we are fueling the fire; that as long as we're there, there can be no peace. If this is true then we must find a way out.
 
  • #41
Ivan Seeking said:
The key point made that has caused me to question what may be the best course of action is this: By being there we are fueling the fire; that as long as we're there, there can be no peace. If this is true then we must find a way out.
Exactly. The number of 'terrorist' insurgents is some fraction of insurgents, most of whom just want the occupying forces to leave. Can the US get rid of all al-Qaida elements? Probably not. The US and coalition are precisely the reason al-Qaida was able to enter Iraq in the first place. The longer the US stays, the more angry others will become and this will make easier for al-Qaida to recruit.

As for stability, that will be difficult unless the Sunnis can come to terms with Shi'i and Kurdish communities. I would hope that is the case, but history may be hard to overcome.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Astronuc said:
Exactly. The number of 'terrorist' insurgents is some fraction of insurgents, most of whom just want the occuping forces to leave. Can the US get rid of all al-Qaida elements? Probably not. The US and coalition are precisely the reason al-Qaida was able to enter Iraq in the first place. The longer the US stays, the more angry others will become and this will make easier for al-Qaida to recruit.
As for stability, that will be difficult unless the Sunnis can come to terms with Shi'i and Kurdish communities. I would hope that is the case, but history may be hard to overcome.
There are no good solutions to the Iraqi crisis. The best we could hope for is the UN and the world community to make a deep commitment to help rebuild the destroyed infrastructure and help out with the security situation.

Perhaps with input from neighboring Arab nations an agreement can be reached that is amenable to the Shi'i, Kurds, and Sunnis. They will never accept an American proposal, no matter how sensible. The only hope is for third party, hopefully a regional third party(s).

I am sickened when I think of all the lives and resources poured into Bush's war. Think of the progress that could have been made if 10% of the resources spent on Iraq had been focused on hunting down Al Qaeda. Not only would we be rolling up cells everywhere, we would have the cooperation and goodwill of most of the world by now.

After 9/11 there was a unique opportunity to advance the world community. America could have led the world into a new century of peace and cooperation. Instead Bush chose belligerence, arrogance, and war!

For this I will never forgive him.
 
  • #43
A local congressperson was pointing out that forces were withdrawn from Afghanistan at a time when Osama bin Laden was perhaps still within the borders, particularly around Tora Bora. The Bush administration pulled resources and sent them to Iraq/Kuwait.

Al Qaida and bin Laden directed the attack on WTC, not Hussein.
 
  • #44
Astronuc said:
Schmidt causes ruckus in House debate on Iraq
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051119/NEWS01/511190372/1077/rss02
Apparently some Republicans were not pleased. Schmidt many not have known that Murtha is a decorated Marine himself.
I don't think Murtha or any other Democrat has proposed to cut and run. Instead, they have called for a withdrawal plan soon.
The proposal the other day, against which most Democrats voted, was a GOP-written resolution for immediate withdrawal.
Suggesting she may not have known Murtha's background is being very generous. Her statement and attitude were consistent with the attitude she displayed during her campaign against Paul Hackett in Ohio's Second District. That campaign received some national attention since Hackett was a veteran of the current Iraq war.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #45
BobG said:
Suggesting she may not have known Murtha's background is being very generous. Her statement and attitude were consistent with the attitude she displayed during her campaign against Paul Hackett in Ohio's Second District. That campaign received some national attention since Hackett was a veteran of the current Iraq war.
She barely eked out a win in a heavily Republican district.

BTW Paul Hackett is running for the Senate in 2006.
 
  • #46
BobG said:
Suggesting she may not have known Murtha's background is being very generous. Her statement and attitude were consistent with the attitude she displayed during her campaign against Paul Hackett in Ohio's Second District. That campaign received some national attention since Hackett was a veteran of the current Iraq war.
Well, I don't know much about her, so I gave her the benefit of doubt. Truly sad, that representatives who supposedly are elected to represent the people, seek to demean those with whom they disagree. The point of Congress is to have debates about issues - their job is to deliberate on political matters.

Schmidt mentioned that a Marine Col. had called with a message for Murtha. I thought she was just using some else's words without thinking.
 
  • #47
Bush and Cheney are now whistling a different tune about Murtha.

He used the top of his speech -- televised live by CNN and other news networks -- to praise U.S. Rep. John Murtha, "my friend and former colleague." The 17-term Pennsylvania Democrat made news last week when he called for U.S. forces to leave Iraq over a six-month period.

"I disagree with Jack and believe his proposal would not serve the best interest of this nation. But he's a good man, a Marine, a patriot, and he's taking a clear stand in an entirely legitimate discussion," Cheney said.

President Bush similarly praised Murtha on Sunday while on his trip to Asia.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/21/cheney/
 
  • #48
Can you say - ABOUT FACE! :rofl:
 
  • #49
Astronuc said:
Can you say - ABOUT FACE! :rofl:

f-f-f-f-l-l-i-i-i-i-i-p

f-f-f-l-l-o-o-p

Nope. I can't say it.
 
  • #50
Hey Rove, what can we step in next?
 
  • #51
I think they still tried to take Murtha down. I heard a report that some business deal with this brother was being investigated, but considering all of the butt kissing today, they must not have found anything that could be used to discredit him.
 
  • #52
Washington has now experienced "two" great Congressional acts in recent week which were not in Agreement, or accepted well, by the prevailing and powerful Republican base. This includes one by the Senate, termed by Senator Frist as a "hijacking," and now one by the House (Murth).

In each instance, the legs of the mighty Republicans were buckled from the clean shot by the tiny Democrat. Such illustrates that even the most powerful of foes can be humbled. Isn't this (Democracy) what we are selling to the people of Iraq?
 
  • #53
McGyver said:
Isn't this (Democracy) what we are selling to the people of Iraq?
I sure hope they are paying attention. :tongue2:
 
  • #54
I've been spending a lot of time with moderate Republicans, and when they talk about the President's reputation in their districts, they use words like poisonous, radioactive, hated, loathed...they [the politicians] have to be against him
New York Times columnist David Brooks

Nov 18th, 2005
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/past_programs/2005/05-11-18.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
66
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
0
Views
195
Replies
6
Views
452
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
900
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
31
Replies
1K
Views
100K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
0
Views
551
Back
Top