Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The Noisy Upstairs Neighbors

  1. Apr 18, 2004 #1

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    everybody now gets to enjoy the arguments by the upstairs neighbors
    talking in sps
    and Thomas Larsson was just saying to Urs Schreiber and Lubos Motl
    (in post #7 of Supergravity Billiards thread)

    "Hmrph. It is hardly some random symmetry such as that I suggest. The
    diffeomorphism group is *the* correct symmetry of GR (ask Rovelli!)."


    and Lubos responded that I would hope we wouldnt need to ask Rovelli!

    ----------

    but in Rovelli's recent paper gr-qc/0403047
    he seems to be suggesting that a larger group (extended diffeos) would work and maybe just the plain unextended diffeos are not the right group

    because when things are quantized they leave spurious unphyiscal clutter around, like adolescents who do not clean up their rooms

    so you'd think that from Rovelli's perspective the diffeomorphism group
    is NOT *the* correct symmetry of GR, despite what these fellows say.

    -----------
    Today Lubos offered a bookmaker-odds type questionnaire to
    Nima Arkani-Hamed. Nima is a physicist at Harvard's Jefferson Lab, with whom Lubos co-authored in 2001. They are probably buddies and Lubos knows him well enough to ask him to estimate probabilities of things like this.

    ----quote---
    Prof. Arkani-Hamed: imagine that you are a bookmaker, and you task is to
    estimate the probability of the following events (of course, if you
    write a more detailed answer, it will be appreciated):

    1. The LHC will find convincing evidence of supersymmetry by 2010.
    2. A collider or another experiment will see evidence of large extra
    dimensions or warped extra dimensions by 2015.
    3. An investigation of CMB nongaussianities will support the idea of the
    ghost condensate by 2015.
    4. String theorists will only be a small group in the math departments
    in 2015.
    5. The cultural barrier between the phenomenologists and the string
    theorists will significantly diminish by 2010.
    6. It will be possible for string theory to give a successful and
    completely new prediction about physics, even without knowing anything
    about the "right vacuum" within the landscape.
    7. A nontrivial relation between the parameters of the Standard Model
    will be calculated theoretically by 2030.

    -------end quote----

    except for 4, this looks like a fairly comprehensive wish-list.
    I think that 3. is something Nima would have specialized knowledge and interest relating to---some of the other questions are rather general so perhaps no one would have special insight into them.

    it is an interesting wish-list, maybe as much can be learned from studying the list as could be from studying the answers. from my outside perspective it looks like a tall order to answer, at least with numerical odds

    maybe Nima will not give numerical odds but only say subjective things like "high probability", "low-to-medium probability"-----this could not be used to place bets at the racetrack but is better than nothing
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2004
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted