Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The NSTP Theory as a Philosophical / Scientific Masterkey

  1. Nov 3, 2004 #1
    The NSTP ( Non – Spatial Thinking Process ) theory, a published invention of Kedar Joshi ( b. 1979 ) (i.e.Myself), a Cambridge ( England ) based philosopher, is a position that, in computer terminology, regards Universe as a Non – Spatial Computer and Space as a Virtual Reality (UNSCSVR). This model of reality can resolve the mysteries surrounding quantum mechanics ( e.g. the wave – particle duality, the EPR ( Einstein – Podolsky – Rosen ) paradox, the Schrodinger’s cat paradox ), Zeno’s paradoxes, the biological phenomena of ‘protein folding’ and ‘cell development and differentiation’, relativity, action at a distance ( which is a rehabilitated mystery through Joshi’s work ), etc. All these mysterious phenomena are, in fact, multiple aspects of a singular underlying structure, composed of four conceptual elements :
    1.impossibility of spatial mechanism
    2.space as a form of illusion
    3.phenomenal mind as non – spatial
    4.intelligent orderly execution of spatial events through non – spatial mechanism

    The NSTP theory is the unique theoretical representation of that structure. The NSTP theory is a philosophical / scientific masterkey that unifies apparently diverse phenomena through its powerful non – spatial mechanical framework.

    The NSTP theory is based on

    A] Three axioms ( i.e. self – evident truths ) :

    (One's objection that these propositions are not axiomatic is nothing but one's inability to perceive the truth. These propositions are clearly axiomatic to the author.)

    1) Phenomenal mind ( or feelings or qualia ) is non – spatial. i.e. No kind of feeling, e.g. feeling of colour blue, can be represented by any spatial structure.

    2) All kinds of experiences, even thoughts I know I am having, are feelings or qualias.

    3) A phenomenally conscious self is a temporal stream of non – spatial phenomenal mental events. ( A Non – Spatial Thinking Process (NSTP), as every feeling is itself a thought or idea. )

    B] And two hypotheses :

    1) Space ( as a room or void out there : whether three or higher dimensional, bounded or unbounded ) is a virtual reality ( i.e. a form or projection of non - spatial mind, a kind of feeling ).

    2) Individual or local NSTPs are orderly ( or thoughtfully ) executed by a gigantic, central, or global NSTP ( rather a group of NSTPs ), representing superhuman thoughts or ideas, in order to account for the order in the universe, e.g. the gravitational phenomenon. ( The central non – spatial superhuman thoughts are processed in zero time because of no spatial limitations; e.g. in space it takes time to transfer data from one spatial location to another. Although a conscious human is nothing but an NSTP it is, at least partially, conceptually, as opposed to physically, bound to the spatial biochemical brain, and thus the core NSTPs introduce time lag in processing of individual NSTPs, where appropriate. )

    Further, the existence of the central NSTPs is assumed for two reasons :

    i) In any machine where its peripherals are not intelligent enough to modulate ( or be able to account for ) their own behaviour there has to be some central intelligent part in the machine to bring out the peripheral happenings or phenomena.

    ii) As the laws of physics ( or any other than those of pure mathematics or logic ) are not logically or conceptually necessary there has to be a way to change the ways individual NSTPs are generated ( or produced or executed ). And for that to be possible there has to be some central intelligence existing in the form of ( non – spatial ) mental events, which itself could be modulated to alter the modulation of individual NSTPs.

    Thus, in computer terminology, in the NSTP model of reality the hardware of the universe is composed of non – spatial feelings, while its central software is made of superhuman thoughts, and the peripheral software is made of non – superhuman ones.

    Now take for instance the EPR paradox or some equivalent mysterious experimental quantum phenomenon ( e.g. In 1997 experiments were conducted in which light particles ( photons ) originated under certain conditions and travelled in opposite directions to detectors located about seven miles apart. The amazing results indicated that the photons interacted or communicated with one another instantly or in no time. See Robert Nadeau, and Menas Kafatos, 1999. The non – local universe. 1st ed. Oxford : OUP. Back page. ). According to the NSTP theory this is no longer a mystery as the behaviour of photons is just a form of illusion, a virtual reality ( to non – spatial mind/s ) which is actually modulated ( or orderly executed ) by hidden / core non – spatial superhuman mental events. ( Again in analogy with spatial desktop computers such a photonic behaviour on the computer monitor screen has no slightest mystery surrounding it, as it is just a changing pattern of pixels which is modulated by some hidden software processes. )

    The NSTP theory maintains both idealism ( as reality is exclusively mental ) and realism ( as the material entities we see out there do have a real existence in the core central non – spatial mind/s, which would exist independent of any other mind perceiving them ), and both mentalism ( as reality is exclusively mental ) and materialism ( as mind is real, it is physical / material ).

    ‘Philosophy is written in this grand book - I mean the universe - which stands continually open to our gaze, but it cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and interpret the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and its characters are triangles, circles, and other geometric figures, without which it is humanly impossible to understand a single word of it.’
    - Galileo Galilei

    In reality the universe has no geometry.
    - Kedar Joshi
    The Ultramodern Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica : The Foundations of Ultramodern Science and Philosophy.

    Most of the mysteries of the universe are out of the human belief that any mechanism has to be spatial. In reality the mechanism of the universe is non -spatial, whose appropriate understanding shall resolve those mysteries.
    - Kedar Joshi
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 4, 2004 #2
    The NSTP ( Non – Spatial Thinking Process ) theory, if true, must pass the following tests:

    1) It must completely explain the universe, and above all the human reality, without SPATIO-TEMPORAL HISTORIES.

    2) It must completely reconcile SEQUENTIALISM with SIMULTANEITY without any qauntitative and logical deficits.

    3) It must fully account for (both quantitatively and logically) the nature of forms and their relations to things that habitually take them when they come into existence.

    4) It must account for materialism, its underlying mechanics and its relation to phantoms such as consciousness, 'Godoids', Lucifoids, 'Omopoids' etc,,etc.

    5) Finally, it must give a full and coherent account of CAUSAL RELATIONS in general without any logical and quantitative deficits.

    These five tests are the WARRANT for declarng 'The NSTP ( Non – Spatial Thinking Process ) theory' WHOLLY consclusive!

    Think Nature! May the 'Book of Nature' serve you well and bring you all that is good.
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2004
  4. Nov 4, 2004 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No, at most they are the warrant for declaring the NSTP theory logically consistent and consistent with the empirical facts we already know about nature (although there may be other 'tests' needed to assert this fully). Such consistencies are the base requirements for a theory to be viable; they are certainly not sufficient to declare a theory conclusive.
  5. Nov 4, 2004 #4
    To an extent, yes! I agree.....and that's the reason why I stated the five tests in the first place. Other categories of declaratory, existential and quantificational aparatuses may be called into play, if any. I am not ruling out this either.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook