Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
General Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
Materials Engineering
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
General Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
Materials Engineering
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
The Nuclear Power Thread
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="russ_watters, post: 6568314, member: 142"] According to the article the standard wisdom is now 30 years. It seems like as time goes by it gets further away. Unless one of these startups succeeds. If these projects hold significant promise, why are we bothering with ITER? Because nobody knows if they hold promise, because they are being done under a veil of secrecy, away from the skeptical eye of the scientific community. Smells fishy to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Engineering
Nuclear Engineering
The Nuclear Power Thread
Back
Top