The Orthogonal Complement

  • Thread starter LikeMath
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Orthogonal
In summary: What kind of constraints?I think we should have some contraintes on M and N, do not I?For example, M could only be a subset of N, or N could only be a subset of M.
  • #1
LikeMath
62
0
Let M and N be two subsets of a hilbert space H.
What are orthogonal complements of following sets:
1) The union of M and N.
2) The intersection of M and N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So, what did you try already??
 
  • #3
[itex] x\in (M\cap N)^\bot [/itex] means
[itex] <x,y>=0 [/itex] for all [itex] y\in M \text{ and } y\in N [/itex] and hence

[itex] x\in M^\bot\cap N^\bot. [/itex]. The other direction is obvious, so we get [itex] (M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot\cap N^\bot [/itex]
This is for the intersection, but I strongly think that I had a mistake.
 
  • #4
[itex] x\in (M\cap N)^\bot [/itex] means
[itex] <x,y>=0 [/itex] for all [itex] y\in M \text{ and } y\in N [/itex] and hence

[itex] x\in M^\bot\cap N^\bot. [/itex]. The other direction is obvious, so we get [itex] (M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot\cap N^\bot [/itex]
This is for the intersection, but I strongly think that I had a mistake.
 
  • #5
I don't think the other inclusion is obvious.

In fact, I suspect [itex](M\cap N)^\bot = M^\bot + N^\bot[/itex]...
 
  • #6
I do not know what do you mean by the sum of tow sets? and how can I prove that?
 
  • #7
one can't, in general, sum two sets, but if we already have an addition defined, then:

A + B = {a+b : a is in A, b is in B}.
 
  • #8
How did you guess that it is the sum of?

since my goal is to reach this equality.

How can we prove it?
 
  • #9
normally, to prove 2 sets are equal, you show they contain each other.
 
  • #10
Of course, but I did not manege tp solve it!
On the other hand, [itex](M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot+N^\bot[/itex] means [itex]M^\bot+ N^\bot\subset M^\bot\cap N^\bot[/itex], but this seems senseless, does not it?
 
  • #11
LikeMath said:
[itex] x\in (M\cap N)^\bot [/itex] means
[itex] <x,y>=0 [/itex] for all [itex] y\in M \text{ and } y\in N [/itex] and hence

[itex] x\in M^\bot\cap N^\bot. [/itex]. The other direction is obvious, so we get [itex] (M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot\cap N^\bot [/itex]
This is for the intersection, but I strongly think that I had a mistake.

your definition of [itex] (M\cap N)^\bot [/itex] isn't correct here.

we don't know that <x,y> = 0 for all y in M and y in N, just those y that are in the intersection. if y is in M-N, all bets are off.
 
  • #12
Oh yes, that's the problem. But the problem now how can we prove that
[itex](M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot+N^\bot[/itex]
 
  • #13
LikeMath said:
[itex](M\cap N)^\bot=M^\bot+N^\bot[/itex]

I think we should have some contraintes on M and N, do not I?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
LikeMath said:
I think we should have some contraintes on M and N, do not I?

Yeah, M and N should both be subspaces.
 

1. What is the definition of the orthogonal complement?

The orthogonal complement of a vector space V is the set of all vectors that are perpendicular to every vector in V.

2. How is the orthogonal complement denoted?

The orthogonal complement of a vector space V is denoted as V.

3. What is the relationship between a vector and its orthogonal complement?

A vector is said to be orthogonal to its orthogonal complement and vice versa. This means that the dot product of a vector and any vector in its orthogonal complement is equal to zero.

4. How do you find the orthogonal complement of a vector space?

To find the orthogonal complement of a vector space V, one can use the Gram-Schmidt process to generate an orthogonal basis for V. The orthogonal complement is then the span of the vectors that are orthogonal to this basis.

5. What are some real-world applications of the orthogonal complement?

The concept of orthogonal complement is used in various fields such as computer graphics, signal processing, and physics. It is used to find the best approximation of a signal, to solve optimization problems, and to determine the direction of forces in a system.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
381
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
192
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
149
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
992
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
175
Replies
4
Views
743
Back
Top