The Pauli exclusion principle catastrophe.

Main Question or Discussion Point

The "Pauli exclusion principle" catastrophe.

:!!) Recent works with MOTTS have proved the inability of Pauli's work to account for experimental results on the field of high-temp superconductors.

Could anyone add his or her own opinion about this?

By the way, have any of you guys received any info about some crazy guy posting threads against quantum mechanics and its abilities to describe our reality?

A friend of mine received the following URL connection where those infames and totally crazy articles were posted:

<link removed>

That guy used the pseudo-name of "humanbydefault"... I think that he is dangerous and should be imprisoned for life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

882
2
cartasianproject said:
:!!) Recent works with MOTTS have proved the inability of Pauli's work to account for experimental results on the field of high-temp superconductors.
Could you provide a source for these experimental results please?
 
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,987
14
cartasianproject said:
:!!) Recent works with MOTTS have proved the inability of Pauli's work to account for experimental results on the field of high-temp superconductors.

Could anyone add his or her own opinion about this?
What is a "MOTTS" ?

Are you talking about Mott Insulators ?

Please provide complete references.

Also note that we do not permit links to crackpot sites.
 
Last edited:
Hans de Vries
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,085
21
Last edited by a moderator:
574
0
Hans de Vries said:
I suppose so. There was a lot to do about Kim Hyun-tak's work last week:


http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200509/01/200509012234585309900090609062.html
http://english.etnews.co.kr/news/detail_top.html?id=200509020001&art_grad=9
http://www.ecnasiamag.com/article.asp?id=3671 [Broken]

So, they managed to make a transistor from a Mott insulator.

Regards, Hans
Was there anything about upcoming articles on this? This would be a grand discovery but there has been nothing about it at nature's or science's news.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,216
4,034
cartasianproject said:
:!!) Recent works with MOTTS have proved the inability of Pauli's work to account for experimental results on the field of high-temp superconductors.

Could anyone add his or her own opinion about this?
I think you have some MAJOR misunderstanding occuring here. Mott insulators, or even the Mott-Hubbard bands, says NOTHING about Pauli's work. In fact, it is BECAUSE of the pauli exclusion principle that an antiferromagnetic ground state of Mott compound is an insulator and NOT a metal, as predicted by conventional band theory. The electrons just simply cannot hop to the next site occupied site due to the exclusion principle. It is conventional band theory that failed, not "pauli's work".

Zz.
 

Related Threads for: The Pauli exclusion principle catastrophe.

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top