What is the Impact of Early Human Migrations on Genetic Diversity?

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
In summary, two new papers have come out about the genetic make-up of early Americans. The first article shows that all humans today originated from a single migration out of Africa through Mesopotamia and the Arabian Peninsula, and the second article shows that different migrations of H. sapiens humans encountered and interbred with Neanderthals or Denisovans resulting in different mixes of these different genomes and therefore creating more genetic diversity.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,486
9,715
Two new papers have come out about the genetic make-up of early Americans.
This has helped to clarify the relationships among early American residents, revealing different waves of migration.
Here are two popular articles on these findings from;
NY Times
Science magazine
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have seen on TV that some paleoanthropologists do not completely rule out that there might have been a second immigration path from the Atlantic. IIRC the evidence was, that the way the Clovis manufactured flint was similar to European finds of the same time period. I'm curious whether this possibility will be ruled out or even be supported by future genetic analysis.
 
  • #3
Interestingly, there was an article recently that used genetics to show that all humans today originated from a single migration out of Africa through Mesopotamia and the Arabian Peninsula. Of course, that was long before the migration to the New World.
 
  • #4
DaveC426913 said:
Interestingly, there was an article recently that used genetics to show that all humans today originated from a single migration out of Africa through Mesopotamia and the Arabian Peninsula. Of course, that was long before the migration to the New World.
I've heard about it, too. We seemingly went through at least one genetic bottleneck of - what I have heard - a few hundred people and about 15 different families or so. Would be interesting to know something about the least number of individuals needed to save a species. Maybe the interbreed with other human species was simply a necessity.
 
  • #5
fresh_42 said:
...at least one genetic bottleneck of - what I have heard - a few hundred people and about 15 different families or so.
I did not know it was this small.

fresh_42 said:
Would be interesting to know something about the least number of individuals needed to save a species. Maybe the interbreed with other human species was simply a necessity.
An active area of research. There was speculation a few years ago that North Atlantic Cod may be effectively extinct because they won;t breed in populations smaller than millions.*
* may be an entirely apocryphal artifact of my aging brain
 
  • #6
DaveC426913 said:
I did not know it was this small.
I wished I knew a reliable source. It was a couple of years ago as biogenetics started to investigate mitochondrial DNA in more detail. However, it's possible that it was based on an article of a single scientist and does not necessarily reflect mainstream knowledge.
 
  • #7
DaveC426913 said:
Interestingly, there was an article recently that used genetics to show that all humans today originated from a single migration out of Africa through Mesopotamia and the Arabian Peninsula. Of course, that was long before the migration to the New World.
Of course, there are those who never left Africa to consider, so not all humans are descended from those that migrated out.
In addition, different migrations of H. sapiens humans encountered and interbred with Neanderthals or Denisovans resulting in different mixes of these different genomes and therefore creating more genetic diversity.

fresh_42 said:
I've heard about it, too. We seemingly went through at least one genetic bottleneck of - what I have heard - a few hundred people and about 15 different families or so.
A few hundred individuals seems small to me (that would be as small a breeding population as in some inbred fish genetic lines I had),
unless that happened along time ago so the background levels of mutation could gradually restore genetic diversity,
fresh_42 said:
Maybe the interbreed with other human species was simply a necessity.
or unless hybridizing with a second population could quickly restore diversity levels.
 

1. What is "The Peopling of the Americas"?

"The Peopling of the Americas" refers to the process by which humans first migrated from Asia to the Americas, and the subsequent development and diversification of indigenous cultures and societies in North, Central, and South America.

2. When did the first humans arrive in the Americas?

The exact timing of the first human arrivals in the Americas is a topic of ongoing research and debate among scientists. However, evidence suggests that the first human migrations from Asia into the Americas occurred at least 15,000 years ago, and possibly as early as 20,000-25,000 years ago.

3. How did humans migrate from Asia to the Americas?

The most widely accepted theory is that early humans crossed a land bridge called Beringia that connected present-day Russia and Alaska during the last ice age, when sea levels were lower. This allowed humans to walk from Asia to North America, eventually spreading southward into Central and South America.

4. What evidence supports the theory of Beringia?

Scientists have found genetic, archaeological, and linguistic evidence that supports the theory of Beringia. For example, DNA studies have shown that indigenous populations in the Americas share genetic ancestry with populations in Asia. Archaeological evidence such as tools and human remains have also been found in both Siberia and Alaska, suggesting a connection between the two regions. Additionally, linguistic similarities between certain Native American languages and Asiatic languages also support the theory of migration from Asia.

5. How did the Peopling of the Americas impact the development of indigenous cultures?

The Peopling of the Americas led to the development of diverse and complex indigenous cultures and societies throughout North, Central, and South America. The migration and settlement of different groups of people in different regions led to the development of distinct languages, traditions, and belief systems. These cultures also adapted to and shaped their environments, creating unique agricultural, artistic, and technological practices.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
2
Views
873
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
694
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top