the question is if we suppose that a function f(n) can take only two values +1 and -1 both with equal probability and define the summatory(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \sum_{n=0}^{x}f(n) =A(x) [/tex]

how can one prove that [tex]A(x)= O(x^{1/2+e}) [/tex]

?? if we set A(n)=M(n) the Mertens function and since

[tex] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(M(n)-M(n-1))n^{-s} =1/ \zeta (s) [/tex]

then is RH true by this argument? ,

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The Probabilistic argument

Loading...

Similar Threads - Probabilistic argument | Date |
---|---|

Notation for the nabla operator arguments | Jun 27, 2014 |

(Non-)Cartesian Categories and Diagonal Arguments | Jan 9, 2011 |

Is there a probabilistic approach to number theory conjectures? | Oct 7, 2010 |

What is Probabilistic number theory , could we rely on it ? | Apr 16, 2008 |

Valid argument ? | Mar 19, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**