Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The red rains

  1. Nov 17, 2013 #1
    Is discovery science's "Unexplained files" more believable than say ,History channel's "Ancient aliens" ?
    Red rain

    Mod note: Inappropriate links removed
    They said the red rain 'cells' did not have any nucleus or DNA(they could not find any) but were multiplying ,are there any known organisms that can multiply without DNA?
    I don't know much about it ,but why is it so hard to break it's cell wall? it's not as if its made of unbreakable material.
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 17, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 17, 2013 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The red rain was established to be caused by a local algae:

    Suggestions that it is anything else have no supporting data. There has only been one peer-reviewed study suggesting extraterrestrial origin but at most it showed that there were samples containing particles that resembled cells and no DNA was found. In other words not conclusive at all: http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0601022v1.pdf

    Given studies like the one below that have found DNA and identified the spores as terrestrial (and there are many more) I'd hazard a guess that the study that didn't find DNA had poor methodology.
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: The red rains
  1. No rain demands Putin! (Replies: 1)

  2. Redness of the eye (Replies: 4)

  3. Red eye (Replies: 1)