The variance equation basically sums up all the distances between each data value and the mean of the set. The interesting thing is that each distance and squared for a reason that I believe is to make the distance positive, but why don't the statisticians just take the absolute value of each distance to give a smaller number? Is there some benefit to having a large number to work with? I mean, the smaller numbers nevertheless have decimals that can be used to compare magnitude and such.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thank you.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The Replacement of Squaring the Individual Distances with Absolute Values in Variance

Loading...

Similar Threads - Replacement Squaring Individual | Date |
---|---|

A Interpreting a paper on spectral analysis | Mar 14, 2018 |

I Validity of replacing X by E[X] in a formula | Dec 16, 2016 |

Numbered balls and replacement | Mar 25, 2013 |

Unordered with replacement | Dec 16, 2011 |

Difficult Brain Teaser: Combinatorics Problem on Selection with Replacement | Dec 16, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**