Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The S^infinity sphere

  1. Feb 9, 2007 #1
    Hi,

    I was able to enumerate all the subcomplexes of S^{infinity}, where S^{infinity} has two 0-cells, two 1-cells, two 2-cells, etc. But how do I show that S^{infinity} is contractible?

    Can anyone point me in the right direction? X is contractible if and only if the identity map of X is homotopic to a constant map.

    I guess I don't see what kind of homotopy (a shrinking map) I need to set up between X and a point.

    Thank you!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 9, 2007 #2

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    My best guess would be to construct your homotopy piece wise.

    Let P be a point.

    For each of your 0-cells, can you find a homotopy that maps your 0-cell to P?

    For each of your 1-cells, can you find a homotopy that maps your 1-cell to P, that restricts to the aforementioned homotopies on the two endpoints?

    For each of your 2-cells...
     
  4. Feb 11, 2007 #3
    I worked on it yesterday and I think the following might work: choose an arbitrary point p =(x_1, x_2, x_3,...) in S^infinity. Then show that at time t=1, this point is located at q =(y_1,0,0,0,0,....). This method should work.

    The above advice should work as well (I thought about it before), but remember that we have two 0-cells, two 1-cells, two 2-cells, etc. We know that the unit circle S^1 is not contractible, and neither does the unit sphere. So say we assume that S^infinity = S^2. Then if we look at one cell at a time, sure, we can find a homotopy between a cell and a point, but if we look at S^2 as a whole, it certainly is not contractible.

    So I'm not sure if looking at each of the cells and then find a contracting map works, otherwise, this will imply that S^1, S^2, S^3, etc. are contractible. But this certainly is not true.
     
  5. Feb 11, 2007 #4

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Your reasoning about 'cell at a time' is flawed - there is nothing that says that the map must stay within the cell at each point ("in time"). In fact the homotopy *must* map each cell to the point.
     
  6. Feb 11, 2007 #5

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    what is clear is that each copy of S^n shrinks to a point in S^(n+1).

    what you must do is see whetehr this allows you to write down a global homotopy inductively.

    by the way what is your definition of S(infinity)?
     
  7. Feb 11, 2007 #6

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    If it's mine then that is trivially the homotopy you need (since it is surely a limit in some appropriate sense).
     
  8. Feb 12, 2007 #7
    "what is clear is that each copy of S^n shrinks to a point in S^(n+1)."

    That makes sense. However, writing down the global homotopy inductively might be a little difficult, I think.

    The definition of S^{infinity} is the union of S^n, where n=0,1,2,3,..., where each of the subspheres S^k is a subcomplex. It is obtained inductively from the equatorial S^(k-1) by attaching two k-cells, which are the components of S^k - S^(k-1).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: The S^infinity sphere
  1. Infinity in equations (Replies: 1)

  2. Limit on infinity (Replies: 7)

  3. Integrating Infinities (Replies: 5)

Loading...