The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones

In summary, this summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam, published his findings on. Many of the collected samples have been fully characterized, for example this thin section of a carbonatite: Sample Hor 1 has been classified as a calcite-bearing clinopyroxene-hornblende lamprophyre that has been dated to 313 Ma. This sample contains abundant augite and brown hornblende. This sample (Fen 23) consists of zoned biotite and carbonates, dated to 594 Ma: Many of the samples are carbonatites, but there
  • #71
This sample is also a melteigite:

Fen 13 ii.JPG


This sample consists of subhedral elongated grains of aegirine-augite, diopside, and apatite in a groundmass of (altered) nepheline, calcite, and titanite:

DSC_3729.jpg


DSC_3730.jpg


Nepheline altered to chlorite and sericite/muscovite (below, surrounded by apatite grains) so this sample is probably F2 fenitized to some degree.

DSC_3726.jpg
Altered nepheline (center, below) contains small crystals of (possibly) epidote, if true then presence implies hydrothermal alteration.

DSC_3708.jpg

A higher-magnification XP view of the crystalline inclusions- one in the upper left has the characteristic habit:
DSC_3720.jpg


Some calcite in veins. Opaques: grains and a few “skeletal” arrangements of needlelike grains (ilmenite? magnetite? (60 degree symmetry? 90 degree symmetry? reflecting the primary mineral?) filled with pyroxene, calcite, and cryptocrystalline (probably)TiO2. These features are really striking and can best be seen with epi-darkfield imaging:

DSC_3741.jpg


DSC_3740.jpg


Biotite replaced with chlorite (anomalous blue birefringence), here with (F2?) titanite (very high relief) and pyroxene (high relief), a grain of carbonatite on the lower right:

DSC_3727.jpg


DSC_3728.jpg


Sample lacks melanite (see below).

From a relevant paper: Ijolites and melteigites (mela-ijolites)consist of euhedral prismatic crystals of clinopyroxene and apatite set in a matrix of nepheline and minor calcite. Sphene and strongly zoned (5-12% TiO2) melanite are common accessories. Pyroxenes are pleochroic in shades of light yellow-green to apple- green. Colorless to light brown cores of Al-diopside can be found, but the bulk of the pyroxenes are low Ti, low Al, Na-rich diopsides. The compositional zoning is one of Na and Fe enrichment along an aegirine-hedenbergite trend similar to that determined for the urtite pyroxenes, e.g.Di70Hd20Aeg10 to Di40Hd40Aeg20. Pyroxenes from ijolites which contain melanite are richer in Na and Fe on average than pyroxenes from rocks which lack melanite.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #72
I originally thought this sample was also a melteigite:

Fen 12 ii.JPG


because it superficially looks like the other samples. However, it's actually a pyroxene-hornblendite (or a hornblende-pyroxenite), an ultramafic rock lacking quartz and feldspar that consists of nearly equal amounts of hornblende and clinopyroxene (most likely a mix of diopside and augite):

DSC_4162.jpg


DSC_4163.jpg


The transparent minerals are apatite and carbonate, likely calcite. While this sample is about 5% apatite, the other Fen 12 sample I have is closer to 15% apatite. But that sample doesn't have photogenic crystals of hornblende:

DSC_4548.jpg


DSC_4549.jpg


Both hornblende and pyroxene grains are anhedral poikiolitic containing mostly apatite chadacrysts, but there are also pyroxene and biotite chadacrysts. Since everything is sub- or anhedral, I'm not sure if these are proper 'chadacrysts' or just inclusions. Hornblende is also a hydrothermal metamorphic product of pyroxene, so pyroxene inclusions could indicate incomplete alteration of the pyroxene. A couple of higher magnification views of the central inclusions above, showing apatite and clinopyroxene:

DSC_4568.jpg


DSC_4569.jpg


The opaques are interesting. They are a mix of red hematite (in veinlets), Illmenite (steel grey), magnetite (yellow/gold), and (I think) cryptocrystalline Titanium dioxide (white):

DSC_4575.jpg


DSC_4578.jpg


A super-duper magnification view of the lower right- these grains are tiny! Solidification must have happened extremely rapidly... but it's not a glass.

DSC_4579.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #73
Instead of discussing another sample from the Fen complex, I want to present a sample from Crabtree Mine, in NC:

DSC_1871.JPG


The nearby town of Spruce Pine has been in the news recently; Hurricane Helene dumped about 20 inches of rain into the area around Asheville which has frankly devastated the entire region. My family and I were vacationing there 14 months ago, and we took a side trip to the Crabtree emerald mine:
https://www.emeraldvillage.com/mines-activities/crabtree-emerald-mine/

I knew the area was full of interesting mineral deposits and opportunities for "rock hounding" (https://www.mindat.org/loc-26957.html), because the prior time I visited (also Crabtree) I was about 12 years old, pretty much when this picture was taken:

Crabtree 1981.jpg


That's a load of emerald ore coming up from the mine for us 'civilians' to work through. All of those rocks you see in the image are pegmatite bearing large crystals of tourmaline, mica, cancrinite, beryl... and the occasional emerald . I have vivid memories of the place and was happy to re-visit the area. Even so, I was unaware that the region supplies most of the world's semiconductor industry with pure quartz (the Spruce Pine mine). I can't imagine what the area looks like now.... we joke about how flooding refreshed the mine dumps, but when I think about the people who live and work at Emerald village, or Little Switzerland, or the 1 1/2-lane roads that snake up and down the mountains... it's bad right now.

The region's geology mostly consists of a large intrusion of pegmatite, and the sample I have is primarily plagioclase containing abundant tourmaline (schorl). Last year I sent the sample off to Van Petro (https://www.vanpetro.com/) who prepared the thin section:

DSC_4648.jpg


DSC_4649.jpg


DSC_4650.jpg


DSC_4651.jpg


I would classify this particular rock as quartz-diorite, and the plagioclase often shows deformation twinning.

Confirmation of tourmaline- top row is PP, bottom is XP:

Montage.jpg


The top row shows pleochroism, the bottom shows extinction at 0 degrees- these properties are confirmatory for tourmaline.

One odd aspect about the plagioclase is that some of the grains are sort of blue-grey, while others are sort of yellow-brown. It's hard to show in photos, but hopefully you can see the faint colors, even in PP.

DSC_4668.jpg


DSC_4670.jpg


And finally, a grain of (what could be) ultrapure quartz:

DSC_4667.jpg


Anyhow, I hope the residents are able to recover.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #74
This is an example of Damtjernite from the type locality Damtjern:

DSC_0949.JPG


Quoting from various papers:

“Damkjernites from the type locality at Damtjern are lamprophyric rocks containing phenocrysts of red-brown titanian phlogopite, yellow-brown titanian pargasite (amphibole), and clinopyroxene set in a groundmass of brown-green ferropargasite, pyroxene, green phlogopite, manganoan ilmenite, ulvospinel-magnetiite, and calcite."

Damtjernites are not found anywhere else in Norway, but they seem to be similar to Alnöites. Superficially they are similar to kimberlites, but there are significant differences in mineral content that argues against any simple relationship. In fact, the various damtjernite dikes surrounding the Fen complex all have very different appearances.

DSC_4580.jpg


In the above view, a large pyroxene phenocryst is in the upper right corner, directly next to a grain of titanian phlogopite (pink-purple). Also visible are several zoned pyroxene phenocrysts (brown, mantled by yellow) and calcite. I'll zoom in on the bright purple phenocryst shortly.

Starting with the groundmass:

Montage.jpg


The opaques are Ilmenite, and it's (barely) possible to distinguish the amphibole and pyroxene by end facet angles- for example, in the center several of the grains show 60-degree angles (amphibole). The groundmass is also rich in carbonates. The grains in the upper left corner and lower right corner could be amphibole overgrown with pyroxene.

Zoned titanian phlogopite seems to be one diagnostic of Damtjernite. In PP, the grains are extremely pleochroic (clear - dark red/brown) and in XP, they are a bright turquoise:

Montage2.jpg


In addition to titanian phlogopite, the complex pyroxene phenocrysts are another diagnostic.

DSC_4599.jpg


DSC_4604.jpg


"The pyroxene phenocrysts are composed of anhedral pale green cores mantled by anhedral to subhedral overgrowths of purple-brown pyroxenes. The pale green phenocryst cores are Al-Na diopsides which exhibit a wide range in Al content coupled with a low Ti content, i.e.the pyroxenes are rich in CaAl2SiO6 and poor in CaTiAl2O6. The Al-Na diopsides are complexly zoned with respect to Al2O3, which either increases or decreases from core to margin within individual crystals. The pyroxenes which mantle the Al-Na diopsides and which form the ground mass pyroxenes are Ti-Al salites (salite = Fe-bearing diopside), strongly zoned with increasingTi and Al from core to margin (Table l, anal. 6-9). This zoning reflects an increase in the CaAl2SiO6 component at the expense of the CaTiAl2O6. component.

Another example of complexly-zoned pyroxene phenocryst- I checked the extinction angle to verify this is pyroxene and not amphibole:

Montage3.jpg


Another odd feature found in this sample (and a few other samples) are acicular masses of pyroxene surrounding a calcite phenocryst:

DSC_4633.jpg


DSC_4634.jpg


I like how the calcite looks like soap bubbles...

Finally, the opaques can also have a complex character. I believe this image shows ilmenite (the dark grey) lined with pyrite or magnetite (the bright yellow) and titanium dioxide:

DSC_4647.jpg


I've identified 40 different examples of damtjernite in the collection, I hope to spend some time going through the different localities because the samples do show significant variations.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #75
This next example of damtjernite comes from Brånan:

Bra 2.JPG


While there are some differences between Damtjern-damtjernite and Brånan-damtjernite, there are some similarities. For example, the presence of zoned titanian phlogopite:

DSC_6433.jpg



DSC_6434.jpg


and complexly-zoned pyroxenes (top of frame, titanian phlogopite on bottom):

DSC_8464.jpg


DSC_8466.jpg


From one of the papers: “The damtjernite dike near Brånan (Werenskiold 1910), 20 km NNW of the Fen complex, is also similar in appearance. The rock, which has been described by Brogger (1921) and Griffin & Taylor (1975), consists of phenocrysts of zoned augite, zoned biotite and aggregates of carbonate in a groundmass of pyroxene, biotite, opaques, melanite, sericitic pseudomorphs after nepheline, apatite and carbonate. Biotite produces a K-Ar age of 594 ± 20 Ma. “

I didn't find any melanite or sericritic pseudomorphs in this sample. In any case, the zoned pyroxenes are probably the most striking thing to image, the lower right image also has a crystal of phlogopite on the left side:

Montage.jpg


Another striking feature- I like how the artist made use of negative space within this calcite ocellus:

DSC_1500.jpg


DSC_1499.jpg


At higher magnification, we see the dark spots are not just opaques but something else (I don't know what...):

DSC_8455.jpg


And finally, at super-duper magnification, I found what seems to be a metal oxide (likely ilmenite) partially covering the tip of a (likely) pyroxene crystallite- note how some of the dark spots are out of focus, so this really is a three-dimensional structure:

DSC_8470.jpg


More to come...
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #76
Posting a day early this week... another damtjernite, this one from Steinsrud:

Fen 281.JPG


DSC_1519.jpg


DSC_1520.jpg


The appearance of this damtjernite differs somewhat from the other locales:

"A diatreme-facies damtjernite near Steinsrud, 1 km SW of the Fen complex, is likewise a less dark-coloured rock. Phenocrysts of clinopyroxene, large brown hornblende and biotite, along with phenocrysts or xenocrysts of feldspar (both sodic plagioclase and alkali feldspar) and aggregates of feldspar or feldspar-quartz are embedded in a groundmass of alkali feldspar, minor pyroxene, green amphibole, biotite, opaques, titanite and quartz. Biotite and hornblende give K-Ar ages of 523 ± 20 Ma and 597 ± 30 Ma, respectively.”

The following description is also appropriate- Sanna is a nearby locale with a damtjernitic plug that has an appearance similar to that at Steinsrud:

"The small plug at Sanna (Barth and Ramberg, 1966), 7km SSW of Fen, shows some similarities to the Fen damkjernites. Here, large titanian ferropargasite megacrysts are common and phenocrystal pyroxene cores are Na-salites. However, these cores are mantled by low-Na2O salites with higher MgO contents than the cores. An outer thin discrete rim of apple-green acmitic pyroxene is commonly present on the phenocrysts, and a similar pyroxene together with green ferropargasite forms the bulk of the groundmass. Late-stage fluids have crystallized to alkali feldspars, zeolite (?altered nepheline), and calcite. At Sanna the majority of the phenocrysts are euhedral, country-rock xenoliths are uncommon, and spinel lherzolites appear to be absent, indicating that explosive activity was not so intense as at Fen and that the magma cooled relatively slowly. The Sanna "damkjernite" lacks the characteristic red titanian phlogopite and Ti-Al salites found at Fen."

The important point here is that all the damtjernites have been assigned the same age, suggesting they all formed during the same eruptive event. But then it's difficult to understand how the compositions could be so different. For example, here's a pair of images of the groundmass:

DSC_1531.jpg


DSC_1532.jpg


Along the top are three grains of sphene (very high relief), and the upper middle also shows a couple of hexagonal crystals of apatite. The bottom shows a crystal of pyroxene with the green acmitic rim. Unlike the previous examples, the groundmass here is primarily orthoclase rather than calcite.

An interesting object: randomly-oriented equigranular phlogopite and pyroxene arranged in a shell surrounding (I think) thin laths of feldspar:

Montage2.jpg


Was this some sort of large amygdule? A closer PP view of the feldspar shows the relief in good detail:

DSC_1555.jpg


Another interesting feature are (apparently) zoned opaques, here in reflected light:

DSC_1526.jpg


The center is ilmenite (maybe chromite) surrounded by (most likely) magnetite with a thin rim of granular pyroxene.

Lastly, because this is not mentioned in either published report, I found what I think is stilpnomelane as an accessory in both veinlets and radiating needlelike crystals, here just some needles:

Montage.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #77
Another damtjernite, this one from the island of Presetoya:

Pre 1 c.JPG


"Very similar in mineral composition [to a dark damtjernite dike near Gulbrandstjern], but containing less altered, zoned biotite, is the damtjernite dike on the nearby island Presetoya in Hoseivatn (Klåy 1965), which probably forms the continuation of the Gulbrandstjern dike. Biotite gives a K-Ar age of 594 ± 20 Ma.

"The damtjernite dike near Gulbrandstjern (Klåy 1965), some 20 km SW of the Fen complex, consists of abundant phenocrysts of zoned pyroxene (Ti-augite, occasionally with aegirine-rich cores), biotite (strongly replaced by chlorite and apatite), opaques, zoned melanite and apatite in a groundmass of carbonate, chlorite, epidote, white mica, opaques, titanite, apatite and minor alkali feldspar. Biotite yields a K-Ar age of 601 ± 20 Ma."

DSC_4603.jpg


DSC_4604.jpg


There is comparatively less groundmass compared to other damtjernites. Another zoned pyroxene:

DSC_1560.jpg


One of the pyroxene phenocrysts contains an amygdule:

DSC_4607.jpg


DSC_4608.jpg


It took a while for me to identify the andradite (var. melanite). I thought garnets were isotropic, but apparently andradite can show weak birefringence:

DSC_1563.jpg


DSC_1564.jpg


I think many of the melanite grains have sphene cores: melanite formula is Ca3(Fe,Ti)2(SiO4)3, sphene is CaTiSiO5, so the chemical composition is similar, and it's possible to see a grain of something in the center of the garnet:

DSC_4609.jpg


DSC_4610.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #78
This is the last example of damtjernite that I have from a known location (I have others generically 'from the Fen region'):

Fen 6 d.JPG


"Within the Fen complex, 0.5 km east of Sove, there is a dark, carbonatized damtjernite in diatreme facies. The rock contains abundant biotite flakes (up to 4 cm in diameter), which give a K-Ar age of 578 ± 20 Ma and a Rb-Sr model age between about 555 and 580 Ma, depending on the assumed initial87Sr/86Sr ratio (0.705 or 0.702, respectively)."

Note that this sample is of a carbonatized damtjernite- almost everything has been metamorphosed into carbonate (possibly dolomite, there's no clear way to tell).

DSC_5730.jpg


DSC_5731.jpg


Large opaques, rounded phenocrysts (pelletal lapilli of varying sizes) and angular phenocrysts (both presumably pyroxene altered to carbonate and quartz) and phlogopite (moderate pleochroism clear - light brown) crystals in a groundmass of anhedral equigranular carbonate with small blades of phlogopite and opaques.

Phlogopite crystals are rounded and often show kink banding, here with some pelletal lapilli:

Montage2.jpg


A closer view of a small pelletal lapilli shows the overall structure of carbonate and quartz grains. The light brown mineral may consist of minute flakes of phlogopite?

DSC_5722.jpg


DSC_5723.jpg


Other (presumably) pyroxene phenocrysts have been completely converted to carbonate:

Montage.jpg


And a closer view of the groundmass:

Montage3.jpg


Phlogopite and apatite are apparently resistant to the hydrothermal carbonation reactions, but some phlogopite is eroded. Here's a high magnification view of an apatite grain, showing some sort of alteration along the border:

DSC_5727.jpg


And finally, the larger opaques can have a halo of a fine white and fine red cryptocrystalline materials:

DSC_5721.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #79
This sample is a Damtjernite from somewhere within the Fen complex:

Fen 8.JPG


To recap, here are some maps of the area starting 'big picture' and then zooming in:

Fen map 2.jpg

I have damtjernite samples from many of the identified locations: Branan, Horte, Tveitan, Degernes, Fjone, Hjolmodal, and Gardnos (Gardnos is an impact crater, not an eruptive feature) and posted images from most of these. Zooming in:

Fen map 1.jpg

I have posted images of damtjernite samples from Presteoya, Steinsrud, and Damtjern. Zooming in to the Fen complex (this map calls damtjernite 'lamprophyre'):

Fen map 0.jpg

Damtjern is the black smear in the lower right. Within the Fen complex, there are numerous damtjernite pipes.

The point of all this is to show that even though all damtjernite is assigned the same geological age and are all 'close to each other', implying association with the same eruptive event, their petrology is highly variable. The only real constant (AFAICT) is complexly-zoned pyroxenes. Most of the samples have titanian phlogopite phenocrysts, but not all. Most of the samples have carbonate, but not all. Most of the damtjernite within the Fen complex has olivine (lherzolite), implying a more forceful eruptive event since lherzolite is mantle-derived, but not all. Moving on...

DSC_6793.jpg


DSC_6794.jpg


This particular sample is highly melanocratic- possibly the most extreme of all my samples- due to an excessive amount of opaques. It's possible this sample is highly tectonized. Large crystals of phlogopite dominate this field of view.

Montage4.jpg


This image shows a few features of interest. In the center is (I think) an ocellus: the center is amphibole, surrounded by a shell of carbonate (probably dolomite), itself surrounded by a thin shell of (I think) amphibole:

Montage.jpg

Regardless if this is an ocellus or not, this feature (a mafic grain surrounded by carbonate and rimmed by another mafic mineral) appears with some regularity.

There are also complexly-zoned pyroxenes:
Montage2.jpg


And zoned amphiboles:

Montage3.jpg


The groundmass consists of carbonatite, phlogopite, opaques, pyroxenes, amphiboles... the usual!
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #80
Here is another sample, possibly cut from the same rock:

Fen 8 ii.JPG


Unfortunately, I have not yet identified all of the minerals that are present. In any case:

This sample is Damtjernite, from somewhere in Fen. Very melanocratic due to large amount of opaques.

Montage2.jpg


Phenocrysts of complexly zoned pyroxenes (diopside?) and rimmed (?) amphiboles. Large crystals of highly pleochroic (clear to red-brown) zoned titanian phlogopite. Lots of opaques. Mesh-textured partially-to-fully serpenitized olivine indicates mantle-derived rock and a violent eruptive event.

Montage4.jpg


Again, there are altered phenocrysts consisting of rimmed mafic mineral mantled with carbonate (dolomite?).

Montage.jpg
Groundmass is largely carbonate (likely dolomite), phlogopite, and opaques. Andradite occurs as an accessory.

Montage9.jpg


Now we get to the complicated stuff- any suggested identifications are welcome!

Partially altered (mesh textured) pyroxene grain, possibly carbonate veins, reaction rim is granular carbonate with many opaques, itself surrounded by a mantle of pyroxene and/or amphibole, with an appearance of lamellar twinning in places.

Montage6.jpg


Montage7.jpg


Identifying this grain proved difficult- the fracture pattern could be either pyroxene or amphibole (both geometries are present), and if pyroxene, it's probably orthopyroxene based on the XP images.

Here's another example: Orthopyroxene (?) grain surrounded by a granular rim surrounded by amphibole (?):

Montage3.jpg


In these two cases, I at least have some hint as to the identities. In this last set of images, I have absolutely no clue. Overall, it's a grain of partially altered pyroxene (mesh textured). However, zooming in to a small region, I found some sort of yellow-green mineral, low to medium relief, with a totally bizarre birefringence pattern:

Montage8.jpg


Maybe it's a phyllosilicate, but the color and birefringence is (I think) don't really match those group members. If it is bastite, then the grain is orthopyroxene. I dunno what it is, but I found the Eye of Sauron:

DSC_6836.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #81
The next few samples of damtjernite are from a different (and unknown) location within the Fen complex:

Fen 26 c.JPG


Damtjernite from Fen complex. Porphyritic sample featuring a large partially serpentinized (mesh textured) olivine grain with inclusions:

Montage.jpg


on a background of zoned pyroxene phenocrysts and phlogopite crystals in a groundmass of carbonate, pyroxenes, and phlogopite:

Montage2.jpg


Olivine is likely somewhere on the forsterite (Mg rich) to fayalite (Fe rich) series. So far, I have been unable to identify many of the minerals in this sample. For example: Within the large phenocryst, several possible amygdules: interior is carbonate (likely dolomite), some phlogopite grains, and a thin shell of (possibly) chlorite rimmed by opaques.

Montage4.jpg


Microtextures of some of the fully serpentinized phenocrysts have remarkably intricate spatial patterns of opaque microcrystals, in one there may be a small crystal of sphene.

Montage5.jpg


DSC_1130.jpg


DSC_1132.jpg


Untitled.jpg


The fibrous mineral may be phlogopite, but I am unsure.

By stopping down the condenser, the olivine reminds me of stained glass; in reflected light the opaques suggest rivers of silver.

DSC_6843.jpg


DSC_6842.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
Back
Top