What the???? Kill Homer, this is not South Park, you don't just kill main characters.... :surprisedcronxeh said:Simpsons are great, but lately its been like beating a dead horse http://carboninside.com/deadhorse.gif
I think its time to wrap it up.. by .. KILLING HOMER!
Actually they can. I have even pulled up searches on Google where there was a disclaimer that said that that they had to delete a link to a website because they were threatened with legal action unless they removed the link because the website contained copyrighted material without authorization.Smurf said:No, they can't. It was probably a reference to something in that thread.
I thought you didn't care for the slapschtick type humor? :tongue:Evo said:My favorites are the Simpsons Halloween marathons.
They don't need to make money on it- in fact, other people can make money talking about the Simpsons- tv critics, for example.Daminc said:It's probably as lame as Fox not getting money for it. Big corporations are all the same; sick, greedy b@stards picking on those who can't fight back :(
I don't understand why Fox would want to stop people from talking about how much they like the Simpsons. But I'm just wondering what their beef was.Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”
- (emphasis mine) http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html