In Perkins's(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Introduction to High Energy Physics, the author obtained the spin of neutral pions from the decay [tex]\pi^0 → 2\gamma[/tex] He argued that the z-component of the total photon spin in the above decay can have the value [itex]S_z=0[/itex] or [itex]2[/itex]. If [itex]s_\pi=1[/itex], then only [itex]S_z=0[/itex] is possible, and the two-photon amplitude must behave under rotation like [itex]P_1^m(\cos \theta)[/itex] with [itex]m=0[/itex].

Why does the orbit angular momentum [itex]l=1[/itex] in his reasoning? Acually I do not understand why only [itex]S_z=0[/itex] is possible. Since if there is a [itex]l_z[/itex], then [itex]S_z[/itex] can be both 0 and 2.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The spin of neutral pion

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**