Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The stone enigma

  1. Sep 21, 2005 #1

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Around 2000BC a group of welsh people transported 98 blue stones, weighing
    6 tons each, from the highest point of Carn Meini aprox 1000ft, in the Preseli hills Penbrokshire, to Salisbury Plain Wiltshire, a trip of more than 200 miles.

    AFAIK these people did not have the wheel or any known method of moving
    these stones, so how did they move over 500 tones of stone 200 miles ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 21, 2005 #2

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    I thought Merlin sent them flying all the way..

    Somewhat less facetious:
    There are at least two options:
    1) felling of trees, and effectively moving the stones into place by placing the stone on top of the boles (trunks?) and roll the tree-trunks (this is the technique Vikings used when they moved their ships over stretches of land)
    2) Wait until winter, and use some sort of sledge.
     
  4. Sep 21, 2005 #3
    Did they not have the wheel? God, it takes FOREVER for things to catch on in Britain!

    Regardless of trees or sledges, I imagine it would have taken longer than one season to transport the rocks 200 miles.
     
  5. Sep 21, 2005 #4

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    :rofl:

    Well, I don't think it was likely that the stones would be stolen during the summertime..
     
  6. Sep 21, 2005 #5
    Then you underestimate the competitiveness of the celestial time-keeping industry.
     
  7. Sep 21, 2005 #6

    honestrosewater

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Did they have any contact with the civilizations around Egypt, Mesopotamia, etc.? Maybe they used similar technologies? Egyptians were moving big stones by 2000 BC, weren't they?

    Just another possibility: It's been suggested that the people of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) effectively 'walked' their moai statues across the island with some system of ropes, rocking them back and forth.
     
  8. Sep 21, 2005 #7

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Hmm...you don't get it, do you?
    Guard companies were of course placed beside each stone.
    Those stones the druids forgot to collect became the nuclei of new towns (after all, the guards were conscientious persons).

    Thus, the urbanization process in England was speeded up relative to other countries (and laid the foundation for the British world dominance in the 19th century)
     
  9. Sep 21, 2005 #8

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Well any one have a ball park estimate of time to convey one six ton stone
    block 200 miles, i do not know the rout taken, but for sure it wasn't all flat.
     
  10. Sep 21, 2005 #9
    Very true. In fact, the word 'town' is derived from the word 'stone', or s'tonne as it was then, a shortening of 'six tonne' which, as Wolram pointed out, is how much they weighed.
     
  11. Sep 21, 2005 #10
    Eddie Stobart quoted me three days. Maybe I was wrong then.
     
  12. Sep 21, 2005 #11
    Let's work it out. Does anybody know the friction constant of proportionality for stone on ground? And the area of the rocks?
     
  13. Sep 21, 2005 #12
    Ah:

    "Conventional archaeological opinion accepts that the Stonehenge monument was built over a period of, perhaps, 1400 years beginning in 3000BC."

    http://www.celticnz.co.nz/US9.html

    Dunno how reliable that is though.
     
  14. Sep 21, 2005 #13

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I will go find the rocks area, by the way it seems that moving these rocks was
    a family thing, an excavation uncovered a welsh family almost certainly involved in transporting the rocks.
     
  15. Sep 21, 2005 #14

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The "band of brothers" found last year, were a family unit of three adults, one teenager and three children buried in the same grave 4,300 years ago, at the start of the metal age.

    The family were found on Boscombe Down and were soon christened the "Boscombe bowmen."

    The burials were found near to the site where the famously wealthy "Amesbury archer" was uncovered three years ago.
     
  16. Sep 21, 2005 #15

    honestrosewater

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    :rofl: Were they found underneath one of the rocks?



    (Sorry, I'm going to hell for that, I know.)
     
  17. Sep 21, 2005 #16

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Perhaps that's a misnomer:
    I think he should be called the "Amesbury harpoonist".
    People weren't dumb before; they had different technologies in order to get stones were they wanted them.
     
  18. Sep 21, 2005 #17

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed


    In this thread you use terms like "Welsh" and "druid". The Stonehenge builders were not celtic, they lived a thousand years before the celts came to Britain. Therfore they were not not Welsh, and they did not have the celtic druids either. Furthermore there is no evidence the stones were moved by people from what is now Wales, rather than from the area where Stonehenge was erected. Much else of your posting is pure speculation too.

    We don't know how the bluestones were transported, but if they were willing to take a very long time in the process, like 50 miles a year, it doesn't seem impossible with rollers and ropes. There could have been a leg of sea transport too.
     
  19. Sep 21, 2005 #18

    wolram

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    It seems so i just found this.

    Engineers had decreed the supposed megalithic moving technique. The replicated dining room table-sized bluestone, about three metric tonnes in weight or 6600 pounds, would be hauled from the Preseli quarries on a wooden sledge by the neo-slaves down to the Welsh shore of the Bristol Channel. From there, the stone would then be floated across the forty-to-seventy miles of water on a log raft made by megalithic methods, and then would again be land-hauled the remaining distance to Stonehenge, about sixty miles.

    No bluestone has ever been moved very quickly or very far by such methods, and Britain's Y2K "Millennium Project" fared no better. After a week, the stone had been dragged slightly less than a mile. There were about two hundred miles left to go, and not enough weeks remaining at that rate to complete the project within Year 2000. On April 15, 2000 a spokesman, Peter Bowen, called for more volunteers to augment the 250 no longer very enthusiastic neo-slaves. The stone was finally moved to the Bristol Channel, but it then slid off the raft and was lost.
     
  20. Sep 21, 2005 #19

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Direct your criticism at OP.
    If you can't see the difference between a serious post (post 1), in which I merely tossed forth a couple of possible transportation methods, and posts that even an idiot would recognize to be jocular (however bad), well, then that's your problem.

    Or, alternatively, if your motive is merely to throw up as much bile you want on me, then you are unfit as mentor on PF.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2005
  21. Sep 21, 2005 #20

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I was thinking the same thing. :biggrin:

    Wolram, do you have a link to that, I'd like to read it.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: The stone enigma
  1. The Atlantis Enigma (Replies: 7)

  2. Happy Birthday Enigma (Replies: 14)

  3. Is wolram an enigma? (Replies: 31)

  4. Happy Birthday, enigma (Replies: 8)

Loading...