The talking cure - which is better?

  • #1
Considering that it takes years and years of analysis. Is Classical Freudian Psychoanalysis a much effective way of curing people?

or

Is Cognitive-Behavioral therapy a much, more practical, efficient and effective way?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
5
5
I'll vote for Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, but not because it is less time-consuming. It is much more grounded in research.
 
  • #3
Recognizing that: "What you see in others, is a truth, that arises from within you" that is the best therapy you will ever find, as it is revealling, totally, of you to yourself, but only if ya got the guts to look hard at yourself, and accept the parts of yourself that you don't like...openly! and honestly! (Ouch! Inculcated!)
 
  • #4
Mr. Parsons, that is also a role played by the therapist. A mirror.
 
  • #5
Uhmm yes if you cannot face yoruself entirely you will need help, personally, I found that 'within' as well, God, but not everyone can handle that one, so, YUP! they probably need the therapist to help them, no problemo.....

:cool:
 
  • #6
6,265
1,280
Freud was an exceptionally perceptive man who arrived at alot of useful insights. I found The Interpretation of Dreams to be amazing. Somehow, though, his insights didn't translate into an effective therapy.

Cognitive Therapy, at least the version presented by David Burns M.D., strikes me as vastly superior to Freudian analysis
 
Last edited:
  • #7
69
0
Cocounseling! It'll be easier to find a real audience.
 
  • #8
What in the world is Cocounseling?
 

Related Threads on The talking cure - which is better?

  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
831
  • Last Post
5
Replies
101
Views
14K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Top